ACRONYM CONFUSION

Dear Reader: A reminder, if you go further, you have chosen to read a blog by Finnegan on Traditional Values. Values that are time tested, and not secular and revisionist. Nothing more traditional than LIFE and FAMILY issues. Those who disagree proceed at your own peril.

Recently Gay columnist Daniel Villarreal made clear the real truth behind the homosexual agenda. That being, acceptance of the homosexual life choice as a good one. More alarming, raising our children for us regarding acceptance of same. How do we know this you ask, by his statement of May 18, 2011, "I and a lot of other people want to INDOCTRINATE, recruit, and expose children to queer sexuality, AND THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT!

Nothing wrong with taking the God given responsibility from parents as to how how their faith directs them to raise their children? Did I hear correct, this sounds like something eminating from Iran not America.

What a novel idea Daniel is pushing; the responsibility of parents to offer the religious and moral education of their minor family members being given to those selling a life choice that the parents consider dangerous, disease prone, and sinful. Sure Daniel, and we have a bridge in Brooklyn we would like to sell you.

What is even more interestintg is that our homosexual activists, a small percentage of a small percentage of our population, have consistently denied that they want to indoctrinate (Villarreal's word) our children. DV goes on to say "We need to educate and teach future generations of children to accept queer sexuality, (notice always someone elses children) our very future depends on it."

This is the crux of the matter to many who would opt out of any teaching of a life choice their faith and values strongly disagree with. The deeply held religious beliefs of over 2000 years with over twelve seperate teachings we find included in both the old and new Testament of the Bible.

Now let us look at how the acceptance of faux "marriage" effects this situation. In our summer home Illinois, shortly after votes were taken in the lame duck session, politicians leaving office voted for civil unions for homosexuals by a plurality of 4. All from those leaving office, all who had run on keeping marriage, one man, one woman. Civil unions, the same as "marriage" in all but name and its approval on the federal level. Obama already after that one in trying to end the federal defense of marriage law. Shortly after the approval of CU in Illinois, their demand for marriage in name also has begun, as they use the "seperate but equal" argument.

Weeks after the civil unions law took place, Senator Heather Steans introduced SB1619, a poorly written "comprehensive sex ed bill." An effort to normalize sexual immorality and perversion by inculcating children regarding the acceptance of the homosexual life choice as a good choice. Daniel Villarreal had to be smiling from lip to lip on this one.

Begin to get the connection? Once civil unions, and "marriage" are accepted, then the sex education, and health classes in our public schools begin to take over for our parents, and their children are being raised for them. No opt out, or opt in allowed my friends. Google David Parker Boston Massachusetts to see this. Let me give you just a few of the contents that Senator Stean's bill included once civil unions was passed.

BOYS AND GIRLS AGE 5-8: Keep in mind the age range as you read this.

"Some people are homosexual which means they can be attracted to, and fall in love with, someone of the same gender.' "Two people may decide to marry each other because they love each other." "Touching and rubbving ones own genitals to feel good is called masturbation." "Vaginal intercourse is when a penis is placed inside a vagina."

I would think that almost all would feel that information such as this does not belong in a class of ages 5-8 years old. The oft said, "let the children be children" surely applies here. Most of all, the childs parents are most capable of when information such as this is given to their youngest of children; not the state, or a school system often beholden to the homosexual lobby and an accomodating meda.

In closing, let me give you even more startling news, after the homosexual community deeply wounded our Catholic faith with a very small number of homosexuals admited to the seminary. History showed that in spite of taking a vow of celibacy, they continued to practice their homosexuality, many with younger children. We now see this disgusting practice continue outside the Church by the homosexual community. Two open and clear examples are NAMBLA AND MAP. NAMBLA stands for North American Man Boy Love Association. while the newer effort MAP, stands for Minor Attracted People. Better truthfully stated, Minor attracted pedophiles.

A recent meeting in Baltimore of the MAP group "B4 You Act," was observed by two family advocates for concerned parents. Shockingly it revealed homosexual activists efforts to mimic homosexual lobby tactics to legitimize pedophilia. The argument they suggested using, was "we were born that way." Exactly part of the talking points that the homosexual community fiercely defends in their argument for broad acceptance including "marriage" Born with a proclivity towards sex with children! Can anyone swallor that claim. Meanwhile both NAMBLA and MAP work toward lowering the age of consent for sexual activity to in some countries as low as 12 years old!

The danger of marriage for homosexual goes back to what is best for children. Very few argue that all else being even, studies show convincingly that children do far better as they grow into adults with the unique and seperate teaching skills that belong to father and mother. Almighty God gave us the best way when HE created man and woman, HIS way of continuing HIS people from generation to generation. The complementary nature of the anatomy of God's work show this clearly.Never have the words, "Be careful for what you wish for, you just may get it," been more accurate when it applies to MARRIAGE and whats best for the children.

THE TRUTH IS NEVER HATE, EXCEPT FOR THOSE WHO HATE THE TRUTH!