Now matter how many repeated rants by a couple of Obama supporters on this site. Over 700 repeated rants by just 2 supporters. The fact still is that Obama has had no financial experience prior to his attempts at fixing the economy, unsuccessfully, then he would have had running a newspaper stand.
On the other hand not only does Romney have infinite more experience, he also employed dozens of people who had many times as much experience as Obama.
So you can repeat the chant Obama is great as many times as you wish the fact is, is that he is a failure and wants 4 more years to prove what, that he is by far the worst officer holder in the White house that we have ever had in two terms instead of one?
It may happen and it will be because the same Americans who Klaus called uneducated and "dump" as Klaus said earlier. Now he is saying those same people will vote Obama back into office. So sad that your own words come back to haunt you.
In the meantime I learned that your statement
"It may happen and it will be because the same Americans who Klaus called uneducated and "dump" as Klaus said earlier. Now he is saying those same people will vote Obama back into office. So sad that your own words come back to haunt you."
...is just for Republicans. I am teachable.
Americans support
GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA are very well educated and smart. 53% by Mitt Romney. According to a new poll by the New York Times, Mitt Romney now has a small lead over President Obama. Which proves once and for all that money can't buy you happiness, but it comes in handy when you're running for president, doesn't it?
Nothing about the economy or the handling of such in your rant. Answer the question please and stop with the points you have made 700 times. The more you say it does not make it any more so than what could be said once.
You are no better than the lady ranting about her free OBAMA phone. Is she related to you?
"Obama is a disaster of a president. I don't believe Romney will be much better. If I were the republican party I would sit this election out. Cuts will be made to the budget. Let the Dems own their problems they created."
Creator of the present problems is W. BUSH. Worse President ever.
GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA will solve this terrible inheritance. Only GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA can do it. Mitt Romney is a joke. Republicans are now starting to accept the fact that Mitt Romney will be their nominee for president. But you know, they're not that excited about it. It's kind of like starting to accept that you're going to prom with your sister.
Klaus, Look up Galss-stegal, look when it was implemented, look at WHY it was implemented. Then come back here and tell me that by Clinton repealing it, it didn't open the door for the housing boom to begin. Greenspan helped by lowering rates. Bush near the end of his term saw the problem being created. It was too late and nobody would listen.
Great president Obama could not solve his way out of a paper bag.
No Klaus you are twisting your story. You specifically said Americans not Republican.
Please stop the rants it takes away from anybody else trying to get a word in. Go out side enjoy the sun. You are living in a beautiful place. Enjoy it, your ranting is not being read any longer and even those people who have been stopped.
GREAT PRESIDENT Bill Clinton was the last President with an even budget. Did you forget that?
GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA will be the next in 4 years. Maybe very close.
"Please stop the rants it takes away from anybody else trying to get a word in."
Unfortunately you never learn to argue. A typical American weakness.
Who cares? The majority of the reader are silent, because I speak for them. They are 100% agree with me and
GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA.
Pillars rants ave no value at all.
Klaus, Glass-stegal has nothing to do with the budget. Repealing it opened the doors for deposit based banks to trade risky assets. Think "mortgages"! This was the first step to blowing the housing bubble. Glass-stegal was enacted after the great depression to make sure the banks couldn't blow up the economy again. We have short memories. Stop blaming Bush.
Obama has created $5 Trillion in debt in 3 1/2 years. He will own the largest amount of unemployment, largest amount of Food stamp recipients, etc, in our history if he is elected. Contrary to what many believe, Romney can't fix it. It's too late now. The only way to fix it is to make some very unpopular choices. Those choices won't be made by DC or the people. They will be made for us by the markets. I hope Obama wins. He will be the last Dem ever elected.
WTF Of course I know the Glass–Steagall Act also known as Banking Act. But what has that all to do with
GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA.
I am agree with you, that the banks - by the way world wide - are basically in charge for this crisis framed by the terrible politics of W. Bush. Useless war in Iraq and Afghanistan. I see the Hindukusch different than Iraq. Iraq was W. Bush. Afghanistan is an UN deal. However. The political frame of W. brought America in trouble and the American people by themselves. You mention the mortgage disaster. YES! Bank give without any big controls big mortgages. But the American homeowner take them for their overextended lifestyle. I got in 2004/5 mortgage offers for my nice house on Marco Island in dizziest high. I reject. But my American friends took the money for journeys, cars and jeweleries. I mean, whose responsibility is it. The Bank or the receiver? Finally it is every bodies fall. But Bush was the worse. That is for sure. He killed the stock-market with his politics.
Glass–Steagall Act is part of the disaster. But not the reason for Americas downfall.
But GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA will fix it. You will see.
"I'd like you to go out and find one person who voted for Barack Obama -- or maybe two or three or four or five -- and convince them to come join our team," Romney said to the crowd. "I need you to go out and find people and say 'You know what? It's not working.' It's time to get America going again."
Romney s last HURRAY comes very early.
Who cares.
GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA is the winner. 2 month for election day. It's over Mitt. Go home.
WTF Of course I know the Glass–Steagall Act also known as Banking Act. But what has that all to do with
GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA.
I am agree with you, that the banks - by the way world wide - are basically in charge for this crisis framed by the terrible politics of W. Bush. Useless war in Iraq and Afghanistan. I see the Hindukusch different than Iraq. Iraq was W. Bush. Afghanistan is an UN deal. However. The political frame of W. brought America in trouble and the American people by themselves. You mention the mortgage disaster. YES! Bank give without any big controls big mortgages. But the American homeowner take them for their overextended lifestyle. I got in 2004/5 mortgage offers for my nice house on Marco Island in dizziest high. I reject. But my American friends took the money for journeys, cars and jeweleries. I mean, whose responsibility is it. The Bank or the receiver? Finally it is every bodies fall. But Bush was the worse. That is for sure. He killed the stock-market with his politics.
Glass–Steagall Act is part of the disaster. But not the reason for Americas downfall.
But GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA will fix it. You will see.
Klaus, are you sure you aren't Obama himself? You, like him, want to blame everything on Bush. Will it still be Bushs fault if four years from now we are worse off than we are now?
Q: Who repealed Glass-stegal? A: Bill Clinton! Say it again....Bill Clinton
Alan Greenspan was the second step leading to the housing debacle. Barney Frank and Reid were next forcing the banks to lend to anyone who could fog a mirror. Your stupid friends (and most Americans) that borrowed against their homes believing that the value would only go up to buy stupid stuff were also to blame.
2,000 Americans are dead because of Afghanistan. Obama refuses to pull us out of there. He said he would. He lied. He also said a few days ago we won't be pulling out of Afghanistan. $16 Trillion and rapidly climbing thanks to Obama.
You liberals seem to have a serious problem with the truth. Why?
I love this stuff. I’m sure Biden didn’t admit that the deficit they were left with was caused by a 2 year run of democratic controlled congress. I guess now if you don’t have a budget for 4 years, you don’t need to be concerned about the deficit. I see foreign aid has increased 80% during this administration, another point Klaus or Paradise will ignore or fail to explain. Just keep drinking the Kool-Aid. In regards to ObamaCare. I have family in Canada, there health care IS limited, they will replace the knee of a 25 year old years before a 75 year old, don’t let anyone tell you otherwise. Cancer after 70, plan on dying, it will be stage 4 before you get treatment. Medications are cheaper, but allocated, they will prescribe but it may not be in stock. Is that really what you want. ObamaCare needs to be stopped.
Klaus, are you sure you aren't Obama himself? You, like him, want to blame everything on Bush. Will it still be Bushs fault if four years from now we are worse off than we are now?
Q: Who repealed Glass-stegal? A: Bill Clinton! Say it again....Bill Clinton
Alan Greenspan was the second step leading to the housing debacle. Barney Frank and Reid were next forcing the banks to lend to anyone who could fog a mirror. Your stupid friends (and most Americans) that borrowed against their homes believing that the value would only go up to buy stupid stuff were also to blame.
2,000 Americans are dead because of Afghanistan. Obama refuses to pull us out of there. He said he would. He lied. He also said a few days ago we won't be pulling out of Afghanistan. $16 Trillion and rapidly climbing thanks to Obama.
You liberals seem to have a serious problem with the truth. Why?
WTF
Another post that shows me that you act with stuff you never learned or never understand. I guess you must be a former attendant of one of the 12 elite universities of America to understand the Glass-Steagall Act signed by one of the greatest President of USA in 1933 by FDR. I guess also that about the Glass-Steagall Act no one public high school ever teaches their students.
So you WTF with your middle school degree of an IOWA mini school has no chance to understand what you are talking about. However - some private tutoring for you.
YES! Bill Clinton repealed the act. But why? He was the President with the best political agenda since JFK. On his watch, the act was not real necessary. But than was the worse President ever elected. W. Bush. He change the cards dramatically. That is the reason, why great President Barack Obama considered a modification of Glass-Steagall Act. The goal is very simple: Break the power of the banks.
The by great President Barack Obama featured considerations, the areas of activity exhibit of investment and commercial banks to separate, parallel to the Glass-Steagall Act built in 1933. At the time this law was in the framework of the so-called new deal. Part of a set of economic and social reforms to combat the effects the great depression. The English-language idiom meant so much "New Deal" as
"Redistribution of the cards".
The Glass-Steagall Act named after its initiators from the Democratic Party the Senator Carter Glass and the Congress representatives Henry B. Steagall. Already in the years in 1932, they brought in response to the numerous bank failures from 1921 until the beginning the 1930s a common first act the refinancing of banks by the Fed regulated. The more significant second Act, Glass-Steagall Act (Banking Act of 1933), and others forced the Institute to either as commercial bank for the classical deposits and ending business, as well as related services such as accounting and payments (commercial banking)or as Investment Bank for the securities business (investment banking) to decide. This was in contrast to the universal banking system, the both the activities of business, as well as of investment banks in the same company, the Separating Banking System (SBS) for the United States binding. The main objective of the Glass-Steagall Act was,in particular, the so-called Proprietary trading of commercial banks to stop, so trade with financial instruments (money, securities, foreign exchange, varieties, precious metals or derivatives), the in the own name and is carried out for its own account of the Bank and not directly through a Banking is thrown.
Another post that shows me that you act with stuff you never learned or never understand. I guess you must be a former attendant of one of the 12 elite universities of America to understand the Glass-Steagall Act signed by one of the greatest President of USA in 1933 by FDR. I guess also that about the Glass-Steagall Act no one public high school ever teaches their students.
So you WTF with your middle school degree of an IOWA mini school has no chance to understand what you are talking about. However - some private tutoring for you.
YES! Bill Clinton repealed the act. But why? He was the President with the best political agenda since JFK. On his watch, the act was not real necessary. But than was the worse President ever elected. W. Bush. He change the cards dramatically. That is the reason, why great President Barack Obama considered a modification of Glass-Steagall Act. The goal is very simple: Break the power of the banks.
The by great President Barack Obama featured considerations, the areas of activity exhibit of investment and commercial banks to separate, parallel to the Glass-Steagall Act built in 1933. At the time this law was in the framework of the so-called new deal. Part of a set of economic and social reforms to combat the effects the great depression. The English-language idiom meant so much "New Deal" as
"Redistribution of the cards".
The Glass-Steagall Act named after its initiators from the Democratic Party the Senator Carter Glass and the Congress representatives Henry B. Steagall. Already in the years in 1932, they brought in response to the numerous bank failures from 1921 until the beginning the 1930s a common first act the refinancing of banks by the Fed regulated. The more significant second Act, Glass-Steagall Act (Banking Act of 1933), and others forced the Institute to either as commercial bank for the classical deposits and ending business, as well as related services such as accounting and payments (commercial banking)or as Investment Bank for the securities business (investment banking) to decide. This was in contrast to the universal banking system, the both the activities of business, as well as of investment banks in the same company, the Separating Banking System (SBS) for the United States binding. The main objective of the Glass-Steagall Act was,in particular, the so-called Proprietary trading of commercial banks to stop, so trade with financial instruments (money, securities, foreign exchange, varieties, precious metals or derivatives), the in the own name and is carried out for its own account of the Bank and not directly through a Banking is thrown.
By the way! In the moment ALL European Nations WITH money are discussing similar laws like
GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA and GREAT PRESIDENT Franklin D. ROOSEVELT
put in the political pipeline. But in Europe we have Congresses based on responsibility and never the con-heads (concrete heads) of American Republicans with their denial mentality called that patriotic. Republicans are the burying beetles of America with Mitt Romney on top.
Mitt Romney has come under fire for his pledge to eliminate federal funding for PBS. Romney said, 'When I'm president, the only operated puppet speaking to kids will be me.
Klaus, I'm happy to see you did some research. Thanks for the copy & paste from wikipedia. The main point was it separated commercial and investment banking. Doing away with it opened the door to commercial banks to speculate. Speculate they did. They got it wrong. Thanks to the American tax payer and the repeal of mark to market accounting most are all still in business.
By the way Klaus, I would much rather send my child to one of the "Mini" schools in Iowa than one of the liberal marxist cesspool schools your great leader Obama and his wife came from. Not to mention most (99%) of the corrupt scum in DC.
WTF: Why are you so negative? Our country America is a big nation with a lot of values. Why do you struggle with all the government people in DC? They are not so bad you will belief and will make me believing. A leader Mitt Romney will be bad. But you comment that already to. And you are wrong. I study political economy. Of course in Germany. My title is a certified political economist (Dipl-Volkswirt). The Glass-Steagall Act is a fundamental part in Germany close to Keynes theories and part of free market theories. I bet you. The Glass-Steagall Act is not even mentioned in one high school program in America. And an American teacher will answer a question to this political highlight with: WHAT????????? Do you know why WTF? I guess NO with your education level. The Glass-Steagall Act is one of the fundamentals political decisions a government did! Still actual in our present days. Just Democrats can create a political concept like this. I told you that in the moment Germany, UK, France, Netherlands and the Scandinavian nations think about a modification of the original Glass-Steagall Act because like
GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
they belief the power of the international bank system needs to be controlled. I belief so too. But what is with Mitt Romney? Experts are predicting that in the first Republican debate, Mitt Romney will face his fiercest ideological opponent: himself from four years ago. Five years ago he was close to acceptable.
I am not a Republican con-head (Concrete-head). But GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA had not his best day yesterday night in Denver. Result: 1: 0 for Mitt Romney. The Challenger from great President Barack Obama has won the first TV duel. Mitt Romney was well prepared and aggressive. Great President Barack Obama felt uncomfortable during the match. Unfortunately everybody has from time to time a bad day.
The ex-Governor of Massachusetts went on the offensive against great President Barack Obama in from the outset, attacked him because of high debt (based by the politics of George W. Bush), rampant unemployment, and one - as he put it out - wrong turn in the health system. This is "expensive and expensive things pain the families."
Great President Barack Obama, pushed before 60 million viewers on the defensive was wooden. He felt not quite well in this debate which turned mostly to jobs, debt and tax issues. He found them cumbersome, looked mostly down on his cheat sheet, and had to be improved more than once by Mitt Romney> YES! Mitt Romney was very well prepared. No doubt about that. But was it really the "REAL" Mitt Romney? Or just the election-campaigner Mitt Romney?
Great President Barack Obama used not the vulnerable, providing abundant Romney's. Don't forget, Mitt Romney had derided last week to 47 percent of Americans as a social parasites. Great President Barack Obama did not responded to this flop, which important points in the polls cost Mitt Romney and was analyzed, from major newspapers as possibly choice crucial yesterday evening.
However, self-critical Mitt Romney was more media effective. Maybe Clinti Eastwood was with his sheet metal balls helpful. He has a lot of experience of dealing with the media.
Finally,
GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA lost a battle but he will win the war. I mean of course I remember historically the TV duel Ronald Reagan vs. Jimmi Carter.
Debates should not be overvalued.
Mitt Romney s success is above all that he could to give this appearance new impetus to his election campaign. A defeat against great President Barack Obama last night would have made probably destroy the chances of a victory.
I warn to overestimate the effect of a televised debate. Many interesting viewers like me can remember, how Ronald Reagan 1980 could bring a turnaround by six percentage points as a challenger in his debate with incumbent Jimmy Carter.
It was only ONE TV duel, and that took place just a week before the election. This time follow two more duels. And less than five weeks remain until election day.
And most important - Mitt Romney is not Ronald Reagan (and will never be it) and GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA is not Jimmi Carter.
Great President Barack Obama is the most valuable President America has today. That is the truth.
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
GoShots: Talk Derby To Me
Debate over proposed community center…
Scripps Interactive Newspapers Group
Comments » 67
KlausStoertebeker writes:
In the meantime I learned that your statement
"It may happen and it will be because the same Americans who Klaus called uneducated and "dump" as Klaus said earlier. Now he is saying those same people will vote Obama back into office. So sad that your own words come back to haunt you."
...is just for Republicans. I am teachable.
Americans support
GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA are very well educated and smart. 53% by Mitt Romney.
According to a new poll by the New York Times, Mitt Romney now has a small lead over President Obama. Which proves once and for all that money can't buy you happiness, but it comes in handy when you're running for president, doesn't it?
20_Days writes:
Nothing about the economy or the handling of such in your rant. Answer the question please and stop with the points you have made 700 times. The more you say it does not make it any more so than what could be said once.
You are no better than the lady ranting about her free OBAMA phone. Is she related to you?
WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot writes:
Klaus,
Look up Galss-stegal, look when it was implemented, look at WHY it was implemented. Then come back here and tell me that by Clinton repealing it, it didn't open the door for the housing boom to begin. Greenspan helped by lowering rates. Bush near the end of his term saw the problem being created. It was too late and nobody would listen.
Great president Obama could not solve his way out of a paper bag.
20_Days writes:
No Klaus you are twisting your story. You specifically said Americans not Republican.
Please stop the rants it takes away from anybody else trying to get a word in. Go out side enjoy the sun. You are living in a beautiful place. Enjoy it, your ranting is not being read any longer and even those people who have been stopped.
26yearsonmarco writes:
What more can one say??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_s_CGW...
KlausStoertebeker writes:
GREAT PRESIDENT Bill Clinton was the last President with an even budget. Did you forget that?
GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA will be the next in 4 years. Maybe very close.
"Please stop the rants it takes away from anybody else trying to get a word in."
Unfortunately you never learn to argue. A typical American weakness.
Who cares? The majority of the reader are silent, because I speak for them. They are 100% agree with me and
GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA.
Pillars rants ave no value at all.
WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot writes:
Klaus,
Glass-stegal has nothing to do with the budget. Repealing it opened the doors for deposit based banks to trade risky assets. Think "mortgages"! This was the first step to blowing the housing bubble. Glass-stegal was enacted after the great depression to make sure the banks couldn't blow up the economy again. We have short memories. Stop blaming Bush.
Obama has created $5 Trillion in debt in 3 1/2 years. He will own the largest amount of unemployment, largest amount of Food stamp recipients, etc, in our history if he is elected. Contrary to what many believe, Romney can't fix it. It's too late now. The only way to fix it is to make some very unpopular choices. Those choices won't be made by DC or the people. They will be made for us by the markets. I hope Obama wins. He will be the last Dem ever elected.
KlausStoertebeker writes:
WTF Of course I know the Glass–Steagall Act also known as Banking Act. But what has that all to do with
GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA.
I am agree with you, that the banks - by the way world wide - are basically in charge for this crisis framed by the terrible politics of W. Bush. Useless war in Iraq and Afghanistan. I see the Hindukusch different than Iraq. Iraq was W. Bush. Afghanistan is an UN deal.
However. The political frame of W. brought America in trouble and the American people by themselves. You mention the mortgage disaster.
YES! Bank give without any big controls big mortgages. But the American homeowner take them for their overextended lifestyle. I got in 2004/5 mortgage offers for my nice house on Marco Island in dizziest high. I reject. But my American friends took the money for journeys, cars and jeweleries. I mean, whose responsibility is it. The Bank or the receiver? Finally it is every bodies fall. But Bush was the worse. That is for sure. He killed the stock-market with his politics.
Glass–Steagall Act is part of the disaster. But not the reason for Americas downfall.
But GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA will fix it. You will see.
KlausStoertebeker writes:
"I'd like you to go out and find one person who voted for Barack Obama -- or maybe two or three or four or five -- and convince them to come join our team," Romney said to the crowd. "I need you to go out and find people and say 'You know what? It's not working.' It's time to get America going again."
Romney s last HURRAY comes very early.
Who cares.
GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA is the winner.
2 month for election day. It's over Mitt. Go home.
WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot writes:
Klaus, are you sure you aren't Obama himself? You, like him, want to blame everything on Bush. Will it still be Bushs fault if four years from now we are worse off than we are now?
Q: Who repealed Glass-stegal?
A: Bill Clinton! Say it again....Bill Clinton
Alan Greenspan was the second step leading to the housing debacle. Barney Frank and Reid were next forcing the banks to lend to anyone who could fog a mirror. Your stupid friends (and most Americans) that borrowed against their homes believing that the value would only go up to buy stupid stuff were also to blame.
2,000 Americans are dead because of Afghanistan. Obama refuses to pull us out of there. He said he would. He lied. He also said a few days ago we won't be pulling out of Afghanistan. $16 Trillion and rapidly climbing thanks to Obama.
You liberals seem to have a serious problem with the truth. Why?
Sparky100 writes:
I love this stuff.
I’m sure Biden didn’t admit that the deficit they were left with was caused by a 2 year run of democratic controlled congress. I guess now if you don’t have a budget for 4 years, you don’t need to be concerned about the deficit. I see foreign aid has increased 80% during this administration, another point Klaus or Paradise will ignore or fail to explain. Just keep drinking the Kool-Aid.
In regards to ObamaCare. I have family in Canada, there health care IS limited, they will replace the knee of a 25 year old years before a 75 year old, don’t let anyone tell you otherwise. Cancer after 70, plan on dying, it will be stage 4 before you get treatment. Medications are cheaper, but allocated, they will prescribe but it may not be in stock. Is that really what you want. ObamaCare needs to be stopped.
KlausStoertebeker writes:
WTF
Another post that shows me that you act with stuff you never learned or never understand. I guess you must be a former attendant of one of the 12 elite universities of America to understand the Glass-Steagall Act signed by one of the greatest President of USA in 1933 by FDR. I guess also that about the Glass-Steagall Act no one public high school ever teaches their students.
So you WTF with your middle school degree of an IOWA mini school has no chance to understand what you are talking about. However - some private tutoring for you.
YES! Bill Clinton repealed the act. But why? He was the President with
the best political agenda since JFK. On his watch, the act was not real necessary. But than was the worse President ever elected. W. Bush. He change the cards dramatically.
That is the reason, why great President Barack Obama considered a modification of Glass-Steagall Act. The goal is very simple: Break the power of the banks.
The by great President Barack Obama featured considerations, the areas of activity exhibit of investment and commercial banks to separate, parallel to the Glass-Steagall Act built in 1933. At the time this law was in the framework of the so-called new deal.
Part of a set of economic and social reforms to combat the effects the great depression. The English-language idiom meant so much "New Deal" as
"Redistribution of the cards".
The Glass-Steagall Act named after its initiators from the Democratic Party
the Senator Carter Glass and the Congress representatives Henry B. Steagall. Already in the years in 1932, they brought in response to the numerous bank failures from 1921 until the beginning the 1930s a common first act the refinancing of banks by the Fed regulated. The more significant second Act, Glass-Steagall Act (Banking Act of 1933), and others forced the Institute to either as commercial bank for the classical deposits and ending business, as well as related services such as accounting and payments (commercial banking)or as Investment Bank for the securities business (investment banking) to decide. This was in contrast to the universal banking system, the both the
activities of business, as well as of investment banks in the same company, the Separating Banking System (SBS) for the United States binding. The main objective of the Glass-Steagall Act was,in particular, the so-called Proprietary trading of commercial banks to stop, so trade with financial instruments (money, securities, foreign exchange, varieties, precious metals or derivatives), the in the own name and is carried out for its own account of the Bank and not directly through a
Banking is thrown.
KlausStoertebeker writes:
By the way! In the moment ALL European Nations WITH money are discussing similar laws like
GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA and GREAT PRESIDENT Franklin D. ROOSEVELT
put in the political pipeline.
But in Europe we have Congresses based on responsibility and never the con-heads (concrete heads) of American Republicans with their denial mentality called that patriotic. Republicans are the burying beetles of America with Mitt Romney on top.
Mitt Romney has come under fire for his pledge to eliminate federal funding for PBS. Romney said, 'When I'm president, the only operated puppet speaking to kids will be me.
WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot writes:
Klaus,
I'm happy to see you did some research. Thanks for the copy & paste from wikipedia. The main point was it separated commercial and investment banking. Doing away with it opened the door to commercial banks to speculate. Speculate they did. They got it wrong. Thanks to the American tax payer and the repeal of mark to market accounting most are all still in business.
WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot writes:
By the way Klaus,
I would much rather send my child to one of the "Mini" schools in Iowa than one of the liberal marxist cesspool schools your great leader Obama and his wife came from. Not to mention most (99%) of the corrupt scum in DC.
KlausStoertebeker writes:
WTF: Why are you so negative? Our country America is a big nation with a lot of values. Why do you struggle with all the government people in DC? They are not so bad you will belief and will make me believing. A leader Mitt Romney will be bad. But you comment that already to.
And you are wrong. I study political economy. Of course in Germany. My title is a certified political economist (Dipl-Volkswirt). The Glass-Steagall Act is a fundamental part in Germany close to Keynes theories and part of free market theories. I bet you. The Glass-Steagall Act is not even mentioned in one high school program in America. And an American teacher will answer a question to this political highlight with: WHAT????????? Do you know why WTF? I guess NO with your education level.
The Glass-Steagall Act is one of the fundamentals political decisions a government did! Still actual in our present days. Just Democrats can create a political concept like this. I told you that in the moment Germany, UK, France, Netherlands and the Scandinavian nations think about a modification of the original Glass-Steagall Act because like
GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
they belief the power of the international bank system needs to be controlled. I belief so too. But what is with Mitt Romney?
Experts are predicting that in the first Republican debate, Mitt Romney will face his fiercest ideological opponent: himself from four years ago.
Five years ago he was close to acceptable.
KlausStoertebeker writes:
I am not a Republican con-head (Concrete-head).
But GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA had not his best day yesterday night in Denver.
Result:
1: 0 for Mitt Romney. The Challenger from great President Barack Obama has won the first TV duel. Mitt Romney was well prepared and aggressive. Great President Barack Obama felt uncomfortable during the match. Unfortunately everybody has from time to time a bad day.
The ex-Governor of Massachusetts went on the offensive against great President Barack Obama in from the outset, attacked him because of high debt (based by the politics of George W. Bush), rampant unemployment, and one - as he put it out - wrong turn in the health system. This is "expensive and expensive things pain the families."
Great President Barack Obama, pushed before 60 million viewers on the defensive was wooden. He felt not quite well in this debate which turned mostly to jobs, debt and tax issues. He found them cumbersome, looked mostly down on his cheat sheet, and had to be improved more than once by Mitt Romney> YES! Mitt Romney was very well prepared. No doubt about that. But was it really the "REAL" Mitt Romney? Or just the election-campaigner Mitt Romney?
Great President Barack Obama used not the vulnerable, providing abundant Romney's. Don't forget, Mitt Romney had derided last week to 47 percent of Americans as a social parasites. Great President Barack Obama did not responded to this flop, which important points in the polls cost Mitt Romney and was analyzed, from major newspapers as possibly choice crucial yesterday evening.
However, self-critical Mitt Romney was more media effective. Maybe Clinti Eastwood was with his sheet metal balls helpful. He has a lot of experience of dealing with the media.
Finally,
GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA lost a battle but he will win the war. I mean of course I remember
historically the TV duel Ronald Reagan vs. Jimmi Carter.
Debates should not be overvalued.
Mitt Romney s success is above all that he could to give this appearance new impetus to his election campaign. A defeat against great President Barack Obama last night would have made probably destroy the chances of a victory.
I warn to overestimate the effect of a televised debate. Many interesting viewers like me can remember, how Ronald Reagan 1980 could bring a turnaround by six percentage points as a challenger in his debate with incumbent Jimmy Carter.
It was only ONE TV duel, and that took place just a week before the election. This time follow two more duels. And less than five weeks remain until election day.
And most important - Mitt Romney is not Ronald Reagan (and will never be it) and GREAT PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA is not Jimmi Carter.
Great President Barack Obama is the most valuable President America has today. That is the truth.
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.