Web Search powered by Yahoo! SEARCH
There seems to be a shameful pattern emerging here, and I'm not referring to ILOVEMARCO's "defecation-fixation". Councilman Tucker's confessed inability, or unwillingness to distinquish between lies and truth should impress the misled city council. That trusting body assumed Tucker's motion to deny POP's petition was true. Tucker, backed by Minozzi, claimed the petition was illegal. Council, apparently trusting Tucker's integrity as a lawyer, went along with him and denied permitting you to vote on the amendment. Charter facts surfacing now hold that POP's petition was not illegal at all. POP's has asked the city council to re-visit the petition issue. To date, Council has ignored POP's request. Regardless of how you may feel about the charter amendment, is this the type of government that Marco celebrates? Do you care?
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
Username * Don't have an account? Sign up for a new account
Password * Can't remember? Reset your password
Comments can be shared on
Add both options by connecting your profiles.
Feels Like: 85°
Feels Like: 70°
Feels Like: 84°
View popular webcams in our area.
Sign up to read an electronic replica of the Marco Eagle newspaper.
Get your local news anywhere you go from the Marco Eagle. Download app »
See photos from local anglers with their biggest catch of the day. Submit your photos.
Our radar shows current conditions and possible severe weather.