Reply to a comment

See fluoridealert.org waterloowatch.com or just go to pub med and see Yoder K.M. study that show very few dentists even understand current science of how fluoride is now seen as a topical effect. Drinking is illogical for a topical effect. The UK 2000 York review also showed that fluoridation tripled damaged enamel from fluoride toxicity in children. The number went from 15% up to 48 % with fluoridation and 12.5% was ugly enough for cosmetic restoration. When fluoridation started they said fluoridation would be a failure if more then 10% of children had dental fluorosis damage of the most mild form. Augusta Ga in 1990 had at 1ppm 80% with this damage and a unbelivable 14% with moderate and severe damage which is very ugly. Damage by ingestion for something that only benefits by topical action is not smart.
Another failure has been hiding the fact from the first experment blacks were damaged about double of whites with this lifelong ugly damage. They also tend to have more severe damage by about double. It is sinful to hide this from those that will be damaged. The CDC had a ethics charge about this and kidney damage also with risk hidden from the 20 million with chronic kidney disease. The Pizzo 2007 review shows 51% with dental fluorosis now but the CDC still claims 32% which is still a massive failure. Pizzo also showed when fluoridation ends cavities do not increase. The current science shows no benefit from fluoride ingestion but lots of cumulative toxic damage. Until people are informed of the risk there can not be informed consent to force use of this toxic waste product that has never had review or approval by the FDA for safety or benefit. The claims of thousands of studies proving safety and benefit have a hollow ring when the Uk York study discovered not a single one was high quality bias unlikely. Even worse not one single study ever for chronic use ever by any government agency for H2SiF6 which is used in almost all fluoridation. It has 20 toxic contaminates and is too unsafe to test so they never have. The FDA instead admitted to congressman John Kelly NJ after two years and a lawsuit ingested fluoride was sort of grandfathered in as being used prior to 1938 but later admitted that was for use as a excellent rat poison. Rats now get warfin and they give the cheaper toxic waste to us thinking it has safety studies. Fluoridation is about fraud and deception and professional ignorance at all levels. Go to nteu280.org and see why the scientist unions of the EPA think this fraud should end. In 2005 11 unions asked congress for immediate moratorium and a goal of Zero for fluoride just like other deadly cumulative toxins arsenic and lead. Science not decades of deception based on fraud. Jim