Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

Fossil writes:

Steph,John Arceri has never been concerned with what "a good segment of the community feels". Even though the Committee believes it arrived at it's decision based on facts and findings, Arceri announces that this Committee made up it's mind based on "political considerations" and "preconceived opinions". As far as he was concerned, facts presented to the committee had nothing to do with it. If they were unable to arrive at the place he wanted when he proposed this committee then it was a complete waste of time and money (our money). What's with this guy? If the citizens don't agree with what he wants, then the work is not finished? What arrogance.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features