Now I can understand why investing in bank stock can offset my profits and tax burdens neutralizing any legitimate tax liabilities I might have
“decrease in the net loss is primarily due to the decrease in the provision for loan losses, somewhat offset by a decrease in the income tax benefit.” Now I totally understand, why the interest expense declined $20.9 million decrease in average deposit balances. This should make shareholders more comfortable prior to the banks collapse, they explained this exactly as Paulson and Bush explained, the urgent bail out of banks for homeowners to us the gullible
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
marco writes:
Now I can understand why investing in bank stock can offset my profits and tax burdens neutralizing any legitimate tax liabilities I might have
“decrease in the net loss is primarily due to the decrease in the provision for loan losses, somewhat offset by a decrease in the income tax benefit.”
Now I totally understand, why the interest expense declined $20.9 million decrease in average deposit balances. This should make shareholders more comfortable prior to the banks collapse,
they explained this exactly as Paulson and Bush explained, the urgent bail out of banks for homeowners to us the gullible
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.