Web Search powered by Yahoo! SEARCH
Kudos to Recker, Gibson and Popoff for the vote against funding for the Arts. Their argument is based on the fundamental belief that government is not to control art display. Control by government is a form of censorship and as such the arts advisory board which will oversee such disbursement of monies raised by fees on commercial development is now the art critic. Our money to pay for board decisions for the good of the community. Is anyone listening to the groundswell of independent voices calling for limited government both in terms of scope and size
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
Username * Don't have an account? Sign up for a new account
Password * Can't remember? Reset your password
Comments can be shared on
Add both options by connecting your profiles.
Feels Like: 78°
Feels Like: 68°
Feels Like: 77°
View popular webcams in our area.
Sign up to read an electronic replica of the Marco Eagle newspaper.
Get your local news anywhere you go from the Marco Eagle. Download app »
See photos from local anglers with their biggest catch of the day. Submit your photos.
Our radar shows current conditions and possible severe weather.