Sounds to me like we have a City Council that is willing to take responsiblity. The last few Councils liked letting the CIty Administration run things so they couldn't be held accountable. With all the money our city has spent on "must haves", $175,000 is a drop in the bucket. Why not get rid of Joel and Lisa to save even more money?
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
Fossil writes:
Sounds to me like we have a City Council that is willing to take responsiblity. The last few Councils liked letting the CIty Administration run things so they couldn't be held accountable. With all the money our city has spent on "must haves", $175,000 is a drop in the bucket. Why not get rid of Joel and Lisa to save even more money?
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.