Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

Avenger writes:

You are wrong, Monte. The 4 Jan 2010 agenda lists the following item under business: “(C) DISCUSSION – Naming of City Facilities or Rooms.” No mention of naming city hall after Tucker in there!

Given that Popoff presided over that “naming” charade, I find his expressions of dismay in this article quite disingenuous. And according to Thompson’s rebuttal last night, he did inform the previous CC chair (Popoff) about the EPA inquires, and was told NOT to tell the rest of council. Not very open or transparent of Popoff.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features