Now let's think this one through..The taxpayer supplies the revenue that is deemed grant money..(now follow me) the taxpayer supplies the revenue for the "basic" bridge..Now the taxpayer can supply more money in order to take advantage of the increase in the taxpayer supplied money for the grant monies that our city leaders think is a gift from the state? Boy, are we all crazy or what?
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
loscabos writes:
Now let's think this one through..The taxpayer supplies the revenue that is deemed grant money..(now follow me) the taxpayer supplies the revenue for the "basic" bridge..Now the taxpayer can supply more money in order to take advantage of the increase in the taxpayer supplied money for the grant monies that our city leaders think is a gift from the state? Boy, are we all crazy or what?
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.