Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

Ocram (Inactive) writes:

in response to marcomermaid:

DWbadger wrote: "This is a polarizing issue due to the lack of transparency. Many questions have been asked with no answers".
Marco is still waiting for a logical explanation from the Academy on this question:
WHY did they say our Council and Planning Board members are their Volunteers (as stated in their formal application to become a school)?
In this article, Jane is quoted:
"The volunteer list, which isn’t required anyway, was a misnomer and included people who signed up to receive information".

Does there appear in those documents inconsistancies including what you said and the personal references who are mostly from other people who are connected to the Acadamy. None of the references are from former employers or people who would be considered un-biased except one from a family lawyer. I would hope that the members of the CCSB are smart enough people to see this for themselves. Wouldn't you think?

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features