Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

duhuhuhha writes:

in response to islandeye1#236971:

(This comment was removed by the site staff.)

My guess is that you are either a neighbor, or never did business with him. As concerns his charitable contributions, and “news print worthy” photo ops, those actions do not impress me any more than when a mobster gives at the church, or dedicates land for some charity that ends up financially beneficial to him elsewhere. I too have known him for over 15 years. He is simply a man who hides behind contract language and bends it’s meaning in order to screw hard working people out of their money for his own benefit. When all else fails, he basically dares you to sue him as he knows that in contractor arbitrations where he offers 75% of the disputed amount and plantiff decides to still sue and the plantiff wins in court, then the "winning" party must pay the attorneys fees of the defendant if the amount of the award is within 25% of the arbitrated offer. In other words, the contractor "AT BEST" comes out of the job working for dead cost, no profit what so ever. Do not act as a contractor on this mans jobs
He is slick, he is not moral, he is not a good man, period.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features