Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

Ocram (Inactive) writes:

Not to be thought of lightly with mis-directed comebacks. Are you agreeing that the site was asbestos contaminated or not?
If you do agree aren't you supporting a possiblitity that the high school children and teachers will possibly be exposed to asbestos at that site?

Even if they were able to cover up the asbestos, any planting by the students may uncover some.

I can not imagine anyone.... parent or public servent would allow portable structures for classrooms to be placed on that site. They would be gambling with the children's health in 30 or so years.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features