Reply to a comment

That may explain the level of debt on this island. The actual revenues do not meet the level of support required for "essential" services.

Solution: Reduce support of non-essential services that are deemed "essential, i.e. maintenance of 8 tennis courts for the enjoyment by an estimated 500 club users with existing member and usage fees. Or simply raise the fees to the racquet club. Unless, subsidizing the use of eight tennis courts will continue into the future. Are the tennis courts at Tommie Barfield considered for school use only?

Is this too simplistic and approach? Bear in mind, the costs for maintenance do not go away regardless of how much to reduce staffing.

So is the current closing of two courts indicative of a city that cannot afford the size of the current facility. Did they over build to meet a "world class" facility. Perhaps a smaller one is more realistic? Or perhaps, the ultra-rich with a penchant for the best could donate monies for this cause. Unless of course the members of the club see it differently, but they did lament that a recent member initiated fund raiser could not meet the costs considering the injuries sustained.

Since safety is an issue, the city was correct in condemning two courts until repairs can be funded. And should remain so unless, the members can do something about it while the city prioritizes its efforts for "essential" services.

In America, 6 clay tennis courts would be considered extravagant in 99% of the cities and towns in this country, but on Marco Island it is termed as an essential park service. Really?