Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

ajm3s writes:

in response to captnjimbo:

I get it but somehow it does not seem right to charge people for something they are not using.

Present lot owners should be grandfathered.

The market will take care of this eventually...if you get around you see more new homes being built than we have had for years and there seems to be a lot of new seawalls being constucted either in preparation for selling the lot or more likely preparation for home building. Something is definitely up.

You are correct, it is not right to charge people for something they are not using. However, the facility has a gross capacity that is grossly overcapacity.

Even with a 100% buildout there would still be unused capacity based on capital equipment purchased. Therefore, all the costs associated with this overcapacity of which a good portion is in financing debt needs to be apportioned not only on use but property owners because we need to all share as a result of poor planning and management.

Unless, the city intends to change (increase) density at which time then all usage goes up and overcapacity is diminished.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features