Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

ajm3s writes:

in response to WizeOlMarco:

New slogan for the Beautification Committee: Ask not what your city can do for you, ask what you can do for your city.
.....

I think this is an example of what 'a' Committee is trying 'to do for your city'. The Committee and City have to communicate for any project success to result. I suggest to the Committee, select a couple of projects to focus on as 'pilots'; to the City, provide resources (i.g. access to street/utility maps, staff) and adjust the City work plan for the pilot project areas to include the Committee's suggestions. In other words, instead of managing landscape maintenance as currently done, do it in a way that supports the pilot project goal. From these experince a larger scoped project can result.

“We have limited resources. It’s more important to have them do their jobs than to meet with the committee,” Pinter told them.

Though not evident by his reported comment, working with the community is part of Mr. Pinter's and crew's job.

Slight disagreement to your statement:

"instead of managing landscape maintenance as currently done, do it in a way that supports the pilot project goal"

That is the problem, these committees come up with all these "project" goals, and normal day-to-day maintenance suffers. In the real world of budgets and limited resources, we need to focus on the city-s primary responsibilities, namely maintaining its streets and public places. If you wish to win a prize for Trees, USA it will require more resources than maintenance.

My position is that the Beautification Committee has great ideas, but fails to recognize the cost of both material and human resources required. And in this town, the number of Committee members may actually exceed the number of town rank-and-file employees required to carry out its goals.

Recommendation to Beauty Committee: raise the money and get volunteers. Because in my opinion, the city is not even adequately maintaining its sidewalks, yet here is the Beautification Committee's own mission statement:

http://www.cityofmarcoisland.com/modu...

I love goal #9, conversion of rock swales to landscaped swales. Really? Beautification at the expense of water, maintenance and in contrast to the natural environment of a barrier island with seashells.

Imagine, no seashells allowed in a swale on a seashell island, and it is against current code of ordinances.

Focus on fundamentals before we embark on a elaborate mission statement with elaborate landscaping design!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I love this city, but I would love it more if Committees would balance goals with available resources. If there are shortfalls, then provide private sources. Because in essence, your mission statement exceeds what I would expect all citizens need to support. There is another recently formed committee that rose above it all to soar like eagles, which I believe should serve as a model for the Beautification and other committees.

If you want a suggestion for goal #9, may I suggest shell swales; there cheap, cost absolutely nothing to maintain and require no fertilizer. But then again, what I think is beautiful is not unanimously held by the Beautification Committee or perhaps the island at large. However, I do not have a mission statement to guide me, I just want to live here without intrusions of city wide planning defining what is beautiful. Unless of course, we rename this island Stepford, FL.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features