Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

ajm3s writes:

Welcome, to the fold.

But you felt that this island was "I believe there is a wonderful lifestyle here that we all would wish to enhance." And you then stated "I don't like seeing so many vacant houses and vacant land."

Since you have been here since 2004, you are not concerned about the costs associated with poor city management, like waste treatment overcapacity beyond what is required at 100% build out.

So from your perspective, more "enhancements" will serve to eliminate vacant homes and lots. Really, a bloated waste water and high cost water utility will go a long way to encourage "boomers" with a modest retirement income.

Are you serious? Have you been following the debt financial status of this city? And "boutique" with a vacant sign is just as ugly as a "7-11" with a vacant sign. Does over development or poor development have any meaning? There was a time that the city thought it was a good idea to build a solar generating plant. Really?

Pay attention to what is proposed on this island, you may have a lot of catching up? Just my opinion!

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features