Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

Seawaller writes:

" A good business plan on how the building would be funded should be voted on through referendum to end the recent turmoil, he said."

The referendum should be about whether to even build a new community center, not a referendum on how to pay for it. Notice the "turmoil" question has been reframed by council, now admitting the building of the new center is a done deal and glossed over by advocating a referendum to let the taxpayers vote on how to pay for it.

If it wasn't built it would cost the taxpayers nothing. Give us that option in a referendum.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features