Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

ajm3s writes:

in response to WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot:

ajm3s,
I hate to do this but I will. I will bet that Obama care is never repealed even with a Romney win. Not because they can't (maybe they can't) but because they (all of DC, both sides) want this for you and me. There will be some excuse as to why they won't or can't repeal it. Romney is the nominee for a reason (sad) and all this is is a giant dog and pony show to keep you distracted while they (both sides) steel more freedoms from you and usurp more power. Romney designed the frame work for the plan, he's on record supporting the personal mandate. He's also on record supporting a ban on assault weapons in Mass. Google is your friend.

The founding fathers warned us of this many, many, many, times. By the time the people figure out what is happening there will be only one option left. A bloody revolution in this country. It's not the first and won't be the last. It's not all Obamas doing, it has been in the making for years. So enjoy your bread and circuses, and your health care while it lasts.

WTF,

Bear in mind, I am not a big fan of Mr. Romney, having been a manufacturer in MA. I am well aware of Romneycare and do agree with all your comments. If I had a choice, I would have liked to see a Mitch Daniels of Indiana, but that never came to be.

I am also, not a big fan of the Republican establishment, since it has the same attributes of Democrats where policy is devoid of tried and true principles.

However, Americans need to make a choice, and Obama going forward is tantamount to looking to Europe for solutions. He is devoid of understanding state sovereignty and individual liberty.

My mantra: dilution is the solution to pollution. Consequently, need to replace career politicians when we can, and make a choice based on simple criteria, of limited governance and fiscal responibility. So if Americans can pay attention, to vote at local, state and federal levels for candidates that espouse fiscal responsibility, and limited governance.

Government does not need to build community centers with gymnasiums at the local level or subsidize healthcare centers on Marco Island, nor devise a program to manage my healthcare at the federal level under a myriad of government departments created under Obamacare.

If we are to repeal Obamacare and look to more patient centric solutions rather than bureaucratic/insurance centric government regulations, to reduce government spending and manage debt, etc, there is NO hope with Obama.

I do understand, Romney is not perfect, and not even conservative from my perspective, but he promised he would repeal Obamacare and I believe he can because the Senate is looking like many Democratic seats will go to the other side.

I am concerned. But i am more concerned with news media not fulfilling its role to inform the folks. The over the air, mass news media is now a propaganda arm and biased.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features