Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

ajm3s writes:

in response to KlausStoertebeker:

26yearsonmarco I AM 41 YEARS ON MARCO MAYBE I HAVE A LITTLE BIT MORE WISDOM THAN YOU.

First at all the article you mention http://www.worldnewstribune.com/2012/...
is an anti opinion article AGAINST the supreme court of USA.
It shows not very much respect for this great and proofed institution and part of the American constitution. However - everybody has the right of his own opinion. I am really concerned and scared about the statement of Romney:
Mitt Romney set the order of battle with the eloquence of simplicity: “What the court did not do on its last day in session, I will do on my first day, if elected president of the United States.”
I mean this statement means that a President Romney will not honor the decision of the highest court in America because he has another opinion. What kind of understanding is that for a future President of America. With this statement Romney disqualified himself as possible President Americas. Next he will ignore the declaration of independence because he didn't like it.
Think about that if you believe on articles blasteded the US supreme court. In my opinion the supreme court of USA is one of the best and valuables institutions of America. Germany adopted it with a Constitution court. It is proofed and valuable. Any try to undermine the decision of the US supreme court is a direct attack against the freedom of the American democracy.
That is what Romney did. He attacked the American democracy. And he disqualified himself to lead this great nation.
Finally it will help great President Barack Obama. The sitting and next President of USA.
But thanks that you brought this pamphlet to my attention.

"I mean this statement means that a President Romney will not honor the decision of the highest court in America because he has another opinion. What kind of understanding is that for a future President of America"

Romney is honoring the court, and making claim that if elected he will endorse the will of the people by making the claim he will repeal the law. Romney's statement is a call to those Americans who vote, that if elected he will repeal the Affordable Healthcare Act. His comment is not a disrespectful statement. The Supreme Court is voting on the constitutionality of the law, NOT its wisdom or if it is a good or bad law. The American people are responsible to let their elected representatives know by their vote for/against those members who seek to represent them.

Since laws are created by man, they can be good or bad laws. The Supreme Court votes with regard to constitutionality.

Mr. Romney is only voicing his "promise" to repeal the law and the folks can now vote to agree or disagree by voting for the candidate of choice.

On the flip side, President Obama was vindicated by the convoluted opinion of Judge Roberts to declare the act constitutional on the grounds it is a tax, when in fact, President Obama said it was NOT. Would you have denounced President Obama if the Supreme Court voted 5-4 the law was unconstitutional? Would President Obama been equally less honorable a President?

I can only say, I would have voted with Judge Kennedy et al. since their dissension was bold and pointed.

Vote 2012!

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features