Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

GFonda writes:

Why, after several WEEKS was there no article in the Eagle addressing the "non-binding" referendum being placed on the ballot in AUGUST addressing spending $750,000 for an additional number of hours in the evening at the NCH walk-in clinic on Bald EAGLE? I believe the only way the vast majority of part time residents can be made aware of this issue is by timely reporting and thoughtful commentary about the pluses and minuses of this proposal; and this paper is not providing that. Lets see how long it takes for the EAGLE to publish this letter that was submitted June 9th.

My position is that non-emergency, after hour demand for this service is NOT supported by what was stated as statistics at the Council meeting and that it's an outrage that we would have to contribute any funds for this unneeded service. NCH will benefit financially from the fees they charge treated patients without our adding to their coffers.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features