Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

ajm3s writes:

in response to OutWithTheOldies:

Physicians Regional is coming to Marco regardless of the referendum, just not for 24 hour services.

But as NCH figured out a long time ago, overnight 24hr clinic services are not financially sustainable on Marco Island....

If you want to be able to get 24 walk in clinic services on Marco, then you gotta pay for it. Otherwise, just vote NO and move on. Majority wins.

Whats the big deal? I don't understand why every issue becomes an exercise is overstamement by every yahoo with an opinion. Why can't people just have a thoughtful debate about things? The over the moon reaction of some people is just nuts.

If you want 24 hour care from your provider and think $50/year is too much, why don't you see what its like to hire a concierge MD! It might make a difference on which box you mark come November...

I guess you again do not appreciate a vetting process, in which the referendum undergoes a vigorous review.

Over the moon reaction? I suspect you are numb to the genesis of this referendum, the marketing of this referendum by the city and Chairman, and its ramification on property owners. But then again you believe this is a concierge service?

If you believe that, then may I suggest you call a concierge service at midnight, and I suspect they will tell you to call 911 for prompt service.

I believe there is a hugh difference between private concierge services offered in Collier County and what the city (sponsored) public/private arrangement.

But your last statement is very interesting! I suspect you see the candidates in terms of providing for a host of city provided services, whereas, I see the candidates relative to their ability to discern and evaluate efficient use of public assets to address public concern. And speaking of assets, are you aware there are approx. 1500 less single family homes on this island since 2000.

Yet I hear the lament from the city that we need expansion of services. Are these expansions, public initiated or city initiated? Why only a referendum on 24hr care, because it requires the creation of a special taxing district? Quite a limited option.

So as to your categorization of some comments as "overstatements" I say, it is the "understatements" of the city and Mr. Magel when viewed against a backdrop of issues that are more vital that are NOT considered for a vote.

But then again, I demand more from my city and council, NOT in terms of services, but rather quality of fair and balanced review of policies and proposals and vetting of issues.

In fact, I believe this referendum is a poor response to the debacle that occurred earlier this year at the existing facility. From that view, it does not come close to addressing the issues raised. In fact, Mr. Murphy, Fire and Rescue Chief, had offered better options when viewed as emergency issue and better falls under the mantle of public policy.

Vote 2012!

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features