Reply to a comment

I find it interesting that only two candidates were referenced in this commentary. If you go back to the specific question that was posed by MICA, there were other candidates that voiced similar concerns.

Could it be that these two candidates, Mr. Sacher and Mr. Thomas, called out in the editorial pose a threat to Mr. Arceri vision?

If you want informed representatives, I say vote for:

Mr. Petricca
Mr. Sacher
Mr. Honecker

And for the four seat, I would tend to believe Mr. Thomas poses a threat to the City from Mr. Arceri's perspective.

Note: Mr. Petricca voiced a detailed and similar response whereas, Mr. Meyer voiced a more broad belief that the "water treatment plant/sewer project" as "one change that has had a negative impact on our Island community".

I could understand why Mr. Arceri did not call out Mr. Petricca because as a member of the UAB he was informed, but I am still wondering why he did not include Mr. Meyer in his list of candidates that were not informed or misinformed, the claim made against Mr. Sacher and Mr. Thomas.

Perhaps, Mr. Arceri supports Mr. Meyer even given his response, albeit more broad in scope.

Team building philosophy from Mr. Arceri: If you are not with me, you are against me, and need to be eliminated.