Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

Mayor_McCheese writes:

in response to Our_world_according_to_zookeeper:

Paradise, I can not get over how smart you are regarding what Romney may do in the future. Usually when people are so sure what some else will do they themselves have done it themselves.

Since you know so much about the future why are you not so stinking rich that you do not have to worry about your 91 year old mother who is on welfare and take care of her yourself?

You must also be an accountant who seems to "know" all of the tricks on avoiding taxes under the law.

You ademently requested Romney's returns in other posts. Look at his returns again. He gave 30% to charity which he can not get back, not like our V.P. who gave less than 1%.

Where are the OBAMA's college transcripts, their writings, who they associated themselves with at that time. I am more worried about that then what someone else may do in the future. That is far more important to America than what Romney may do with his tax returns later on.

We know Obama is a Socialist, has been a Socialist and MAY, notice I say MAY, be a Socialist for the rest of his life.

First, its not a "trick" to ammend your tax return. Any accountant will tell you exactly what Paradise said and no one would consider it a tax trick or loop hole of some sort.

Second, it is absolutely irrelevant how much charity someone gives when they are running for President. It is great that Romney gives so much to charity, but it has nothing to do with his fitness to be President or his ethics when it comes to his taxes.

Third, your attack on Paradise regarding his 91 year old mother are way out of bounds. She is an American and has EARNED her social security and medicare. She is not a victim or a moocher. I'm sure that Romney and Mrs. Romneys elderly parents are also receiving Social Security and Medicare.

Fourth, why would anyone care about Obama's college transcripts. I'm not sure why you are so concerned about what classes he took or grades he received 25 years ago but your are not concerned about what the other guy did with his taxes (as an adult) three years ago which is far more relevant. The PResident has been in his office for over three years. He has been fully vetted several times by both the liberal and conservative media. With all of the Obama haters out there desparately trying to delegitimize our President by claiming he is somehow unqualified to legally serve or that if we analyze his writings as a 19 year old that will somehow tell us what kind of President he will be is beyond stupid and actually quite unpatriotic. You might care about it, but it is clear from ALL of the polling that America does not care at all.

Fifth, Obama is not a Socialist. You obviously have no idea what a socialist is if you are calling Obama one. The silly "redistribution" scare is so mindless as to be humerous. In America, we have always redistributed wealth to some degree. That is why we have taxes. If you don't like the concept of redistribution, then don't pay taxes. Regan, Bush 1 and Bush 2 all redistributed, as did Clinton, Nixon, Ford, Eisenhower and evey other President we have had since the federal income tax was instituted.

Following you logic, if Obama was really such a socialist he would have tried to institute all sorts of radical programs since as you believe his days are numbered. If he were as scary as you seem to think, he would use his last days as President to get all of the things done that all good socialists want. But, alas, that has not happened. You must be very disappointed.

Stop looking at the world through FOX colored glasses.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features