Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

ajm3s writes:

in response to lauralbi1:

AJM: I used to read your blogs with interest and respect. But for you to question why Ms. Watt would endorse the incumbents (and hopefully Larry Honig) is a real mystery. I suggest you review recent history with regard to the non-incumbents to figure out why. But, in reality, you know why already and I assume your questioning of Ms Watts endorsement is purely rhetorical or an expression of disappointment.
Anyway, we support who we support and respect who gets elected. At least some of us do.
Ed Issler

Ed:

I enjoy dialog, and my comments were to show a perspective and parallel of those I believe are misguided. Now, I am on record of believing in local schools, but I am NOT a believer in misguided policies and vision. Why do I make such a bold statement? And why do I see a parallel with Ms. Watt's vision for public education and her endorsement for a slate of candidates?

Ms. Watt and the MIA board has shown itself to be very focused on getting a facility built right from the start. This focus indicates a strange sense of priorities, given the time restraints and limited financial resources typically found in start-up campaigns. This vision, took valuable time and resources that should be geared to the establishment and roll out of a school, namely establishing a quality teaching staff and rigorous core curriculum with an administration that meets stringent objectives.

Bear in mind, I do not believe, Ms. Watt is a professional school administrator because getting a facility built would not be a top priority for a start-up charter high school. I for one believe this board is misguided, and now to read about an elective on hospitality is a testimony to support my position.

We may disagree as to whom we would endorse, but I see Ms. Watt's endorsement as a slate of candidates that encourage real estate development of public facilities, to the detriment of education. And interestingly, Ms. Watt does not see it as I see it but is actually contributing to mediocrity.

I want a successful high school, but I would be more impressed with the success of graduates and their future exploits. And to facilitate such an outcome is NOT to spend time and resources on a building campaign but the execution of fundamentals, like core curriculum and discipline.

See "naysayers", like myself, want a better community based on excellence through execution of fundamentals, NOT a community based on accommodating benefactors or shiny new buildings to be hip and chic or address special requests.

And a major component of continuing success is adherence and understanding fiscal responsibility and a view of priorities that are NOT befuddled with ribbon cutting glitter.

So what does this city need: REFORM, a return to basics or perhaps a remedial summer school program to address deficiencies.

And this discussion could go on....

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features