Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

ajm3s writes:

Mr. Waldack:

As you commented: "Any rate to be adopted must also be justifiable, meaning a rate that is defendable and reasonable."

Please present your best defense for the reuse water rate? And you may consult Mr. Magel. I cannot find any true discussion based on that specific inquiry.

Bear in mind, those pesky assumptions, for characterizing the cost of reuse water.

I like others would have loved to move on but Mr. Magel in his recent letters to Condo managers and some ICC members wishes to continue to misinform for political gain. And interestingly, you have been discarded by a Chairman pretending to act as a sole citizen.

Sincerely,
Publius

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features