Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

KlausStoertebeker writes:

in response to lauralbi1:

dc5799: Read every blog I have written and I think you will find great objectivity on this subject. It is not I who has lost, for the future of Marco island is something that we all share in.
As I stated above, there are 7 members on our City Council. That means, as always, that policy will require at least 4 members of Council to agree on a particular issue in order for it to be passed or approved.
As long as all discussion on issues takes place in Chambers, I see a very interesting pattern that will develop. We will have to wait and see.
The most experienced City Planner/Maanger type on Council right now is Mr. Kiester. And while he and I have differed on some past issues, he certainly has provien that he has the future of Marco Island as his most important priority. He is not working a "Private Agenda" and I do not believe he will be part of anyone's "Agenda".
Ed Issler

" He is not working a "Private Agenda" and I do not believe he will be part of anyone's "Agenda".

Totally different to you Eddi.

"dc5799: Read every blog I have written and I think you will find great objectivity!"

I will recall some of your best statements on this blogs, Eddi. Showing your great wisdom and objectivity:

Number one:
"Mr. Waldack is doing exactly what the people that voted for him want him to do. And I assure you that he will be re-elected if he runs, for the same reasons he was elected the first time."
Ed Issler
Number two:
"Fossill (Mr. McMullan): How dare you. You have some nerve. You have no right to speak of Public Councils or Public conduct based on what you have done to destroy any Public confidence in anything that you have been involved in."
Ed Issler
Number three:
"Mr. Breeze: In rwssponse to your observations, these blogs are just that. Blogs for people to express their opinions. As you can observe, the blogs are mostly from the minority of voters on the Island as a result of their frustration from the results of recent elections."
Ed Issler
Number 4:
" The STRP is something the majoirty of the citizens want (as evidenced by the last election)"
Ed Issler
Number four:
" You may have forgotten that a consultant has already studied the figures and stated that we can save $5 million a year by taking over LCEC."
Ed Issler
Number five:
"While Mr. Waldack needs no defense from any of us, you must someday come to grips with the fact that he was elected by nearly 7 out of every 10 voters on this Paradise that you share wth all of us. And irrespective of any of that, tell me what it would mean to you if a study was done and showed that we could save $5 million a year by taking over LCEC, and your virtuous LCEC decided to lower our rates by $3 million a year to keep us."
Ed Issler
Number five B:
"Bill Moss did not create problems on Marco, he solved them and upgraded our City in line with the desires and direction of the City Council."
Ed Issler

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features