What's with the City's preoccupation of replacing perfectly good streetlights with something we have to buy, maintain, and get billed power usage for? I don't see any problem with the utility installed luminaires we currently have on most of our streets. I recently noticed the new fixtures on Park Ave. near Winn-Dixie and a bunch more in a pile behind a building over there. Utility installed lights are supplied with power and maintained for a fixed monthly fee per unit. This looks like just another Public Works boondoggle to me. Get rid of Tim Pinter, he's every bit as bad as Rony Joel ever was.
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
NobodysFool57 writes:
What's with the City's preoccupation of replacing perfectly good streetlights with something we have to buy, maintain, and get billed power usage for? I don't see any problem with the utility installed luminaires we currently have on most of our streets. I recently noticed the new fixtures on Park Ave. near Winn-Dixie and a bunch more in a pile behind a building over there. Utility installed lights are supplied with power and maintained for a fixed monthly fee per unit. This looks like just another Public Works boondoggle to me. Get rid of Tim Pinter, he's every bit as bad as Rony Joel ever was.
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.