Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

ajm3s writes:

Interestingly, of the three nay votes, two felt compelled to offer a detailed "BUT" explanation.

I thank god, that there is no BUT required to pass the resolution and the explanations were detailed and to the point and actually consumed most of the discussion by council, BUT......the claims to vote NAY:

1.Redundancy by Mr. Sacher
2.Nullification language by Mr. Honig

Its the 2nd Amendment espousing a basic right and we cannot even get a unanimous vote from our representatives. BUT it was quite a showing.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features