So, imagine a guy just standing there, oblivious to the fact that someone is sneaking up behind him with the intention of hitting him in the back of the head with a blackjack.
In this case, the guy standing there is the appallingly ignorant American public, and the fiend about to smack him is Congress. The blackjack is the “sequester” sure to go into effect Friday unless there is an unexpected outbreak of logic and common sense in the nation’s capital.
According to a survey last week by the Pew Research Center and USA Today, only 27 percent of Americans say they have heard “a lot” about the sequester, 43 percent say they have heard “a little” and 29 percent have heard “nothing at all.”
The survey also showed that should an agreement to avert the crisis not be reached, 49 percent of Americans would blame congressional Republicans, and 31 percent would blame President Barack Obama.
As Obama won’t be running for any office again, this is a much more worrisome statistic for House Republicans — all of whom will be up for re-election in 2014, and for various senators who will have to face the voters next year or in 2016.
The sequester was agreed to as part of the Budget Control Act of 2011, also known as the debt ceiling compromise, because Democrats and Republicans couldn’t agree on how to finance our government. The thinking was to propose such mindless, awful cuts to civilian and military budgets that no sane group of people could ever allow them to take effect.
But lately, Congress has been anything but sane. The Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction couldn’t agree on how to cut $1.5 trillion over 10 years before the original Dec. 23, 2011, deadline, which was then was moved to March 1.
Obama has been taking his advocacy of a balance of cuts and closing tax loopholes for the wealthy to the people. Republicans don’t agree with his plans, but everyone with the exception of those on the far right acknowledge that the president was correct about the effects of a sequester.
He mentioned drastic diminution to our military preparedness, layoffs and furloughs of emergency responders, border patrol and FBI agents, federal prosecutors and air traffic controllers, among others.
“Thousands of teachers and educators will be laid off,” Obama said. “Hundreds of thousands of Americans will lose access to primary care and preventive care like flu vaccinations and cancer screenings.”
This blackjack to the back of the head and possible recession will likely result in a serious economic wound that is self-inflicted. After all, we were the ones who sent those characters to represent us in Washington.
I an not here to present a partisan argument, but the sequester amounts to $85B which less than 3% of......
Oh never mind, you already have bought into Obama"s "balanced" approach. Listen to any business news and all analysts have pretty much said this is not really a crisis of any kind. In fact, I am awaiting a market sell off due to the increase in stock valuation over the last two months, and yesterday it took the Italian elections to stimulate the sell off, NOT the impending "doom" of the sequester.
Imagine, less than 3% cut of a budget increase is laughable in the real world, but the president loves to speak to the dire consequences.
Unbelievable spin or as I like to call it: Bull$$it!!!!!!!!!! And the truth of the matter it was the president's condition and threat of veto if the sequester did NOT pass Congress when he proposed it.
And as to the quotes by Obama...if he chooses to cut specific programs than that will occur, but he and department heads have latitude as to how and what to cut or reduce.
Problem, Obama never thought the Republicans would hold tight, in spite of defense cuts.
Oh boy!!!!!!And the winner is.........?
Those who believe in a smaller central government! Yeah!
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
ajm3s writes:
I an not here to present a partisan argument, but the sequester amounts to $85B which less than 3% of......
Oh never mind, you already have bought into Obama"s "balanced" approach. Listen to any business news and all analysts have pretty much said this is not really a crisis of any kind. In fact, I am awaiting a market sell off due to the increase in stock valuation over the last two months, and yesterday it took the Italian elections to stimulate the sell off, NOT the impending "doom" of the sequester.
Imagine, less than 3% cut of a budget increase is laughable in the real world, but the president loves to speak to the dire consequences.
Unbelievable spin or as I like to call it: Bull$$it!!!!!!!!!! And the truth of the matter it was the president's condition and threat of veto if the sequester did NOT pass Congress when he proposed it.
And as to the quotes by Obama...if he chooses to cut specific programs than that will occur, but he and department heads have latitude as to how and what to cut or reduce.
Problem, Obama never thought the Republicans would hold tight, in spite of defense cuts.
Oh boy!!!!!!And the winner is.........?
Those who believe in a smaller central government! Yeah!
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.