Reply to a comment

Reply to this comment

gladesgator writes:

in response to OldMarcoMan:

"gladesgator Most of you posters here do not understand the story, or are idiots, or have a grudge against the city and want to take every opportunity to bash someone."

So ? Whats your point ?

The point is that there are so many whiney babies posting here ready to jump on the City even when the city did nothing wrong. The city properly answered the estoppel letter revealing the amount of fees due the city. Had any fee been omittied it would be waived due to the listing and the letter.

The city was not required in the estopppel letter to give notice of any outstanding violations. If the letter had included violations perhaps it would not even be considered responsive. Did the attorney ask about any outstanding violations? Apparently not, There is nothing in this story to tell us that.

Interestingly, a different attorney went before the board. The attorney doing the closing did not appear. Why? The realtaors and attorneys were appaently very experienced and did not bother to check on the sewer hook-up or outstanding violations and yet want to blame the city! Where are all of you people that believe in personal responsibility.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features