Toll for Jolley bridge to be studied; no amount set

A television news broadcast Friday morning created a stir among many Marco Island residents. According to reports, the broadcast said Marco Island city leaders discussed a $2 toll for the S.S. Jolley Bridge to fund the construction of a new four-lane structure.

Should there be a toll to pay for the repairs/upgrades to the Judge S.S. Jolley Bridge?

See the results »

View previous polls »

The Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), a countywide multiagency group that studies transportation and planning in the county, decides how to spend the Florida Department of Transportation money that is allocated to Naples and Marco. The MPO prioritizes projects and then funds it with state money.

Members include all of the Collier County commissioners, two representatives from the City of Naples, and one each from Marco Island and Everglades City. Marco Island City Councilor Mike Minozzi has represented the city on the MPO for seven years.

The organization met Friday in Naples.

"During a hypothetical discussion with a reporter, I was asked about the idea of a $2 toll rate," Minozzi said after the MPO meeting. "No recommendations or decisions have been made at this point."

He added that the city council hasn't decided whether a toll should be supported. He said that the public should know that no city council or MPO member has recommended a toll, let alone a specific dollar amount.

The Judge S. S. Jolley Bridge connects Marco Island to the mainland.

Photo by ERIK KELLAR, File photo // Buy this photo

The Judge S. S. Jolley Bridge connects Marco Island to the mainland.

"At the council meeting where Mr. Minozzi was briefing us on the MPO meeting at the time, the council did not support a toll, and for the record, I don't support a toll," Marco Island City Council Chairwoman Terri DiSciullo said. "I think there should be other funding sources found to fund a new bridge. I think that a toll will degrade our way of life as residents, tourists and business owners."

Councilor Ted Forcht said residents have told him that the state should pay for the new bridge.

The Jolley and Goodland bridges connect the mainland to Marco Island. The DOT said that the Jolley Bridge needs to be replaced because it was built more than 30 years ago.

Minozzi and DiSciullo said the DOT has the responsibility for the Jolley Bridge.

"The bridge has been on the top of the MPO project funding list for years, but there is never enough money to fund it," DiSciullo said. "It will be $30 to $40 million."

Minozzi noted that the state has paid $2 million for the engineering plans, which are nearly completed.

"We have worked for years to try to obtain funding from the state, federal government and other agencies," he said. "All to no avail. While the state believes we do need another bridge, they do not have any plans to address the issue until at least 2025 or later."

During Friday's MPO meeting, the organization gave the go-ahead to Cambridge Systematics to do an in-depth traffic study and whether a toll for the bridge is feasible.

The MPO has earmarked $1 million for the S.S. Jolley Bridge Toll Feasibility Study.

Minozzi said that the study would be carried out in two phases. The first phase would be a preliminary feasibility study costing $481,000.

The study will include estimating the traffic and revenue that a toll may produce and other potential revenue sources, and provide information to the public and receiving citizen feedback.

Minozzi said the study will also answer many questions, including whether a toll is needed to get on or off the island, what the cost should be, where the toll booth should be located, whether traffic bottlenecks will result, and if Marco Island residents get a free or discounted pass.

DiSciullo said that, if a toll booth was approved, it would likely be constructed near the Isles of Capri.

"Yes, I would expect backups," DiSciullo added. "I don't know one toll booth that I have been through that doesn't have some traffic backup."

Forcht said residents of the island should get a free or discounted pass if a toll is charged.

The study will also determine how much traffic onto the island will be diverted to the Goodland Bridge and how much revenue will be lost if a toll is established.

Minozzi said that a Web site and phone number will likely be created for people to respond with their opinions on the new bridge and toll.

He added that he asked Cambridge Systematics to hold a public meeting on Marco Island early next month and the company agreed. Cambridge will develop PowerPoint presentations to show to homeowners associations, the Marco Island Area Chamber of Commerce and other business and civic groups.

If phase one of the study determines that a toll is feasible, the second phase would create a study that could be used to support debt financing.

Minozzi said if it turns out that a toll is rejected, the study ends and phase two will not done.

"If (Cambridge) determines that a toll is feasible, then they will determine what the toll should be," Minozzi said.

© 2007 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Discuss
  • Print

Comments » 6

15yearsmarco writes:

"Research staff may stop drivers at the north end of the Jolley Bridge and ask for their opinion on a toll for the construction of a new bridge"
No need to stop cars just go to the Marco side during rush hour when cars are backed up trying to get off the island and ask people if they think a toll booth is a good idea.
I think I know what the answer would be.

rcbauburn writes:

If the City Council supports a toll on the Jolly Bridge, I hope they are prepared for more dissension on the island. Yes we need to do something about the bridge, but charging the citizens of Marco to get on and off the island, with the taxes they are all ready paying is ludicrous at best. Put their muscle behind getting the State and Federal Government to pay for this which is the way it should be.

strike3 writes:

Build the toll booth. People that want to will still come here. The toll on Sanibel is about $7 and people still go there. The beach on Marco is 10X nicer than the one on Sanibel. Make it $8. Limit trafic. Keep people that don't need to be here off.

captnjimbo writes:

This is rediculous. RT 951 is a State road. The State maintains the bridge. There is trafic for 2 hours a day 8 weeks of the year. The State plans to expand the bridge by eaither building a new one or adding a lane 13 years from now. In the meantime, if you don't like the traffic you can use the Goodland adds a few miles but they are no hassle miles. Anyone that has ever lived around tolls knows that they add another source of traffic and accidents. The county and city folks should focus on the State to accomodate the people if more bridge is really neeeded.

ranger writes:

If you toll the Jolley, toll the Goodland too. the old narrow roller coaster 92, with no medians or dividers, will either send you head on at a combined speed of 130 mph, or into a deep canal. This route is very unsafe for the traffic you'll send there putting a toll on the Jolley only.

lleezie writes:

I have to give Minozzi credit. When he doesn't get his way he just keeps on trying and trying till he wears his constituents down and they finally acquiesce.
He is determined to have a toll regardless of what the people want or the fact that it is the States responsibility.
Keep it up Minozzi, that's how Marco became a city.
It failed and failed and failed until it finally passed.
Maybe you'll get lucky and the same will happen for you and your toll.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.