All eyes will be on ENVIRON at Monday’s City Council meeting as the firm presents a rundown of the work they will conduct on Marco in the coming weeks.
While the three scientists will not be able to present any data on their findings so far, they will be explaining the work they anticipate doing.
“They won’t give any data until they could sit in a courtroom and give the data without a reasonable doubt,” said city Public Information Coordinator Lisa Douglass.
The specialists have been on the island sampling ambient air for the presence of hydrogen sulfide, which is released from ground water pumped above the surface during construction.
Public health scientist Tim Varney, one of the experts contracted through ENVIRON, declined to comment through Douglass, citing a desire to provide Monday’s presentation publicly first.
However, Douglass noted, “if they saw numbers that were a risk, they would advise us to immediately shut down.”
But the city’s efforts at caution — meetings with health and environmental officials, changes in the dewatering process and the hiring of ENVIRON — have done little to tamp down the outrage of citizens who have been crying foul on the dewatering for nearly two months.
Residents have come forward at previous City Council meetings to plead with the councilors to stop dewatering until testing is concluded.
“But if you stop, you don’t have any way to resolve all of the questions that are being raised around this,” Douglass said. “We’ve got to ask, how can we do what we’re trying to accomplish at the lowest risk to every aspect of our environment?”
Some residents have gone so far as to purchase their own instruments to measure for hydrogen sulfide.
Godfrey Davies, an opponent of the city’s Septic Tank Replacement Program who has been keeping a close eye on the dewatering program since concerns started to arise, conducted his own tests during a four-day period last week.
He said his readings taken near dewatering sites were off the charts, around 150 parts per million, and that they went down as he moved away from discharge points. But even then, he said, the readings were still in the 40 to 60 ppm range.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration sets its limit at 20 parts of hydrogen sulfide per million parts of air, while the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health suggests limiting exposure to 10 ppm for no more than 10 minutes in a workplace.
Long-term exposure is generally held to a lower threshold, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services states that “typical environmental concentrations” are .00011 to .00033 ppm.
However, Public Works Director Rony Joel called into question the accuracy of resident-gathered measurements, stating that the instruments used by residents are often bought online, and not from the manufacturer. He said those devices are usually not as sensitive or as finely calibrated as those obtained straight from a manufacturer, like those used by specialists from ENVIRON.
But Davies insists that the device he used, bought from a Massachusetts-based company named PID Analyzers, has the ability to run its own diagnostics and was calibrated by the manufacturer.
Davies has since stopped his monitoring, deterred by what he says is a decline in health precipitated by his exposure to the gasses.
But city officials say that beyond the hiring of ENVIRON, there are numerous other checks in place to keep hydrogen sulfide levels under observation.
“If it was 10 ppm every day and a worker was experiencing that every day, I’m sure OSHA would shut it down,” Douglass said of the regulations governing workplace safety.
While ENVIRON gears up for long-term testing on the island, Joel and his department have been seeking new ways to cut back on the gasses released into the air at residents’ doorsteps. He maintains that the gas is not a danger to residents, but concedes that it is a nuisance.
The latest approach is the use of an “air stripper,” a large wooden contraption resembling a chimney, which Joel designed and city workers built.
Water from dewatering sites is pumped into the stripper, sent down a ramp where the water is bounced around to aerate it, and if it works as intended, release the gasses residents blame for causing health problems on the island.
It’s a change from the original method of pumping into the city’s swales, which allowed the water to sit and gave the gasses plenty of opportunity to escape into the air.
In theory, with gasses released from the water as it goes through the air stripper, they are sucked out of the machine’s chimney and released at a higher elevation.
“We’re trying to remove more gas, dilute it, and get it away from the breathing zone where it would potentially become a nuisance to a person,” Joel said.





Catch of the Day: Feb. 9, 2012
Marco Island GOOOH meeting, Feb. 2012
Protests during Wisconsin Governor…









Scripps Interactive Newspapers Group
Comments » 8
Lolala writes:
Why doesn't Joel just capture the gas, bottle it and sell it in the tourist shops? You know, like they sell little bottles of sand. Marco's Fresh Sea Air. Catchy.
lauralbi1 writes:
You know, I read the words Godfrey Davies and a firm in Massachusetts and the first thing I think of is Butch Neylon. I need to go to work, but I would bet the shirt off my back that somehow Mr. Neylon is directly or indirectly involved with this "analyzer" equipment. Can someone rational please check out the company named in the article "PID" and post any connection with Mr. Neylon. Then we can begin to let his suppliers know how he is influencing the use of delicate, scientific equipment in the hands of self proclaimed non-scientific individuals. I will check later. Thanks in advance.
Oh, and Mr. Davies, the measurements need to be taken after the samples have had an opportunity to disperse. At what level does that occur ?? And the samples have to be taken away from the actual dewatering point. How far away were you?? Or are you and the citizens that are complaining while standing on top of the pipes ?? Would it surprise you if Environ, one of the Country's most well known and well respected Environmental Monitoring firms, came back and stated that the levels H2S in the air was not an issue on Marco Island ?? I am prepapred for either answer and we can act accordingly. Are You ??
Ed Issler
EdFoster writes:
Issler:
You are an idiot! Out to kill the messenger once again! Going to work? You mean someone actually hired you? If you lose that job, maybe Rony will hire you to dance around inside his coffin and help slosh the water. Or do you work for the city already? Sure sounds like it.
Ed Foster
Seymour writes:
Is it only the people who have been against the STRP from the start that continue to find problems at each step? How much is it costing us to deal with their unhappiness?
Hawke1 writes:
Seymour...I think you are right, it is the "people" who are against the STRP. We are about to see if these "people" are numerous enough to clear the house as joeywalnuts states. Hope they are because I am quite frankly tired of this group of big spenders.
heebeed writes:
Is it my imagination or has all the dewatering stopped since Environs is here to test? Certainly it has stopped on the main more-frequented streets. Also, before we check out the Davies/Neylon connection you conjured up, Mr. Issler, why don't we re-address the Rony Joel/lift station connection. Do I smell Kick-back?
EdFoster writes:
Mr. Issler:
There's an old adage that people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. How many times did Rony have to return to Cleveland to explain to the court his role in how his former employer (CDM) bribed local officials? It's all in the newspaper records (Cleveland Plains Dealer) so I'm sure you're aware of it. Most everyone else on the island is so why don't you just be a good boy and stifle yourself about Butch Neylon's connection to an H2S meter. You're making a fool of yourself and if you persist in your stupidity, I predict that things are going to get very rough very soon in the upcoming campaign. Rony was never convicted of anything, so why are you trying to convict Butch?
Ed Foster
lauralbi1 writes:
Mr. Foster: I assume you are writing these postings from North Carolina, as that is where you moved to and I sincerely hope that you are happy. I respect you as you express your opinions, formed a group and continue to fight for what YOU believe is right. You are not running for City Council, nor should you as you do not live here. According to the State of Massachusetts, earlier this year, Mr. Neylon applied for renewal of his Electrician's License in Massachusetts. A review of his application/ paperwork will show that he listed his residential/ mailing address as his address in Massachusetts, even though he had filed for Homestead in Marco late last year. He aggressively advertised his home on Marco for rent all season this year, even though he had a Homestead on it (have not checked if he Homesteaded two homes at the same time yet). He did not register to vote in Collier County until Nov 06. My only point with Mr. Neylon is that anyone running for Council should have lived here, and for a significant amount of time. He certainly cannot supervise the activities of other Electricians in Massachusetts if he is running for Council down here. And if he were to get elected, we would need to make certain that Massachusetts knew that he was no longer able to supervise Electricians in that State. I think the majority of voters will agree with these reasons and I am just trying to save Butch the hassle of trying, although I would be thrilled if he does officially declare his candidacy. It would be a boom for his opposition.
By the way, have you reviewed the past of Mr. McMullan yet. It is very interesting. Of most interest is why one of his Criminal Prosecutions was thrown out and some documentation describing how close he was to "possibly" (legal disclaimer) pleading guilty. If you need the paperwork, request it from me, via e-mail, through the Eagle and I will send it to you.
Ed Issler
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.