Home › Island News › Local News
Dog ordinance to be unleashed on Marco
Council votes 6-1 to open public parks to leashed dogs
QUENTIN ROUX / Staff
Critter Cafe owner Cindy Blatt takes Pepper the Dalmatian for a Tuesday lunch time walk in a grassy area off Bald Eagle Drive. Blatt says news of the proposed ordinance to allow dogs on leashes in all Marco Island parks is exciting.
STORY TOOLS
Tell us about it
- What would you add to this story? Tell us what we missed.
- Do you have photos from this event? Documents we need to see? Share with us.
- Upload photos & videos
- More ways to get your stuff online and in the paper.
RELATED STORIES
- Former contemporaries talk about Marco’s new ‘prince’
- Marco council approves small mixed use development, multiple water facility upgrades
- New Marco city manager contract approved at $160,000 yearly
More Local News
- Bryan Milk named City of Marco Island Parks and Recreation Director
- Merchants pulling out all the stops to encourage Islanders to shop local
- City Manager's Weekly Report
Share and Enjoy [?]
Marco Island is going to the dogs. After a lengthy discussion Monday night about making the island’s parks more “dog friendly,” City Council voted 6-1 to draft an ordinance allowing leashed dogs in the city’s public parks. Councilor Chuck Kiester voted in the minority, saying he could support such a move if Leigh Plummer Park was excluded from the list of parks where owners could walk dogs on an eight-foot leash.
It mirrored a similar discussion from October 2006 when council was considering a similar ordinance that excluded Plummer Park. One resident who lives across from the park spoke at the meeting on behalf of 12 other neighbors, she said.
“We have had it with dogs in the park,” MaryAnne Maniace told council. “We’re not against the dogs, we’re against the irresponsible owners.”
Maniace said she and her neighbors have had chronic problems with dog owners who fail to pick up after their dogs, both in the park and in their front yards. She said her neighbors are forced to do a dance called the “doggy-doo dance step-over” every time they walk to the mailbox.
“The park is already littered with dog waste from irresponsible dog owners,” Maniace said. “This mindset just will not continue, cannot continue.”
It forced council to have an extended conversation about excrement in its many manifestations, a humorous departure from discussions of construction contracts and lift station staging.
“I hate picking that stuff up, believe me,” said Councilor Jerry Gibson.
He added that his partner spends most of her time on dog walks picking up after other people’s dogs. However, he said, those problem dog owners should not be taken to represent the whole.
“I hate it when council gets bogged down and we talk about the miniscule minority,” Gibson said. “Those people are going to be slobs and pigs regardless. They’re doing it now. At least in the parks, there are park administrators and other dog owners who can say, ‘Hey, don’t foul it up for me.’ ”
The conversation occasionally veered toward the need for an off-leash dog park on Marco Island – something some residents at the meeting said the island sorely needs. Resident Deborah Chapman, who said on her small street alone there are 11 dogs, told council those tax-paying members of the island community have no place to go with their dogs.
“For now I ask you let pet owners go into public parks – remembering what public means,” Chapman said. “I hope in the near future, the very near future, we will be able to get a real dog park. We really need this.”
Councilor Rob Popoff, who made the motion to move forward with the ordinance, suggested revisiting the issue in a year and determining if changes needed to be made. In the meantime, he said the city would need to work toward strict enforcement of current laws regarding leashes and waste removal.
Interim City Manager Dana Souza took the order from council to draft the ordinance with a possible $500 fine for violations of either law, and to include restrictions on where dogs could go, such as playgrounds, the racquet center and certain areas like the dugouts at Winterberry Field. He said he would examine the possibility of restricting access to playing fields, even when there are no organized events under way.
Souza also said the city would continue looking into the feasibility of creating an off-leash dog park.
Like Marco Island will soon do, the city of Naples does allow dogs in city parks as long as they are on an eight-foot leash. Collier County operates a dog park at Veterans Community Park off of Immokalee Road.

Comments
This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below — responsibility lies with the relevant reader alone. Read our privacy policy & user agreement.
This is great! Finally positive press for the city council!
I am a dog owner and live on a street -- where it seems -- pet owners are the majority. I love the idea of opening the parks to dogs. However, I do agree that there are a lot of lazy dog owners out there that don't pick up after their dogs. (My mailbox is hit almost everyday). I have seen baggie stations at parks in other areas. Maybe if they make baggies more than convenient to those lazy owners, the mess will be a lot less? Just a thought.
#1 Posted by Rachael on April 23, 2008 at 7:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)
don't pick it up...get a $500 fine...period....that's what most cities do.
#2 Posted by van on April 23, 2008 at 8:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)
500$ fine ???????
It's almost impossible to catch every drop of Ole Roy's urine in a little plastic bag.
What isn't caught in the bag lays on the grass and becomes toe lube.
Wal-Mart has sold out of the Urine Urn.
#3 Posted by Motu on April 23, 2008 at 2:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Can I charge a $500 fine if I catch a dog owner allowing his mutt to relieve itself on my lawn? We need to make these folks responsible for their actions or have Coucilman Gibson's "partner" pick up after all the dogs of Marco.
#4 Posted by Fossil on April 24, 2008 at 7:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I think this is great move forward for the island. There are so many dogs and they are a strong positive in the lives of our residents and visitors. As a former dog owner and now a foster parent for dogs for the Humane Society, I support a large fine for violators and the placement of bag dispensers and collection cans to make the removal of waste easy.
#5 Posted by lngoslee on April 24, 2008 at 11:02 a.m. (Suggest removal)
So now our we going to mobilize S--t patrol police to run dna tests? It is readily available at the Vets.Mrs Maniace get a life, I see you peeking out from behind your curtains.
#6 Posted by dc5799 on April 24, 2008 at 4:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)
LOL, Fossil. Great name......... Old and dried up.
Get a life, maybe there is a reason Dogs 'relieve' themselves in your Yard?!?!?
#7 Posted by happyonmarco on April 24, 2008 at 9:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
gernblanstone, the STRP will not bankrupt the city you imbicile because it is being paid for by special assessments.
#8 Posted by ejburger on April 26, 2008 at 8:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)
As a responsible dog owner, I don't take my dog where she isn't allowed and I certainly pick up her poop wherever we are.
If she is allowed in a city park, you had better believe I am picking up after her and you had also better believe that I will be watching other dog owners to make sure they do the same.
I don't want the irresponsible few to ruin it for the rest of us.
#9 Posted by beachykeen on April 27, 2008 at 12:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Why should the city provide bags for the lazy irresponsibe few. I buy my own bags and everyone has publix or other bags.And every one should police other dog owners who don't pick up. They know who they are and so don't I.There are more responsible dog owners than not. You can tell them,arm's folded staring at the sky.It's not the dog's fault.
#10 Posted by dc5799 on April 27, 2008 at 6:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)