A City Hall stonewall?: Water quality tests, results kept from media following raw sewage incident

  • Email
  • Discuss
  • Share »
  • Print
  • A
  • A
  • A

— Was this newspaper being stonewalled? And if so, why? That’s just a couple of questions this reporter is left with following an accident near a temporary pump for a sewer lift station on San Marco Road Dec. 12, which led to a geyser of 18,000 gallons of raw sewage.

The Marco Eagle requested information about the process of testing the waters near the Landmark Canal where Public Information Coordinator Lisa Douglass said about 8,000 gallons of sewage was emitted.

Friday morning the Eagle learned that the Florida Department of Environmental Protection was investigating the spill. At that time, City Environmental Specialist Nancy Richie said she would not take samples because she believed FDEP was taking them.

DEP spokesman Eli Fleishauer did not return calls from the Eagle until Monday when he said DEP had determined their agency’s investigation and oversight of the spill was not necessary.

Richie said Wednesday morning that the Collier County Department of Health took samples at Residents Beach and South Beach Saturday and determined the results were “in the good range for bacteria levels.”

She added that there were no signs of concern in the Landmark Waterway as evidenced by a lack of algae bloom, fish kills or sea grass die off.

Ken Rech of the Collier County Department of Health reported these results to the city Saturday, Richie said.

The Collier County Department of Health did not return calls from the Eagle as of early Thursday afternoon.

Douglass said Monday that water tests were not being taken near the Landmark Canal where the spill occurred and thus no results were available.

Tuesday, Douglass maintained upon further request from the Eagle, that tests were not taken.

Wednesday morning, the Eagle obtained what appeared to be a document indicating the City of Marco Island’s Utilities Department was a client of Sanders Laboratories, Inc., in Fort Myers and was requesting fecal coliform tests of water samples taken at a variety of Marco Island addresses near the sewer pump failure. The document indicated that Bart Bradshaw, a collections and distributions manager within the utility department, was who the lab was reporting to. The time stamp on the fax was 1:47 p.m., Monday.

Douglass maintained Wednesday afternoon, upon urging from the Eagle that she made sure tests were not taken.

“I understand your frustration, but I cannot provide you data we do not have. No one at the city has results,” Douglass wrote in an e-mail Wednesday afternoon.

The Eagle informed Douglass and City Manager Steve Thompson that a document appears to indicate otherwise.

While city officials were maintaining no tests were taken and no results available, microbiologist Katie Strothman of Sanders Laboratories shared her analysis of the city-ordered water test results.

“Fecal coliform is found in waterways naturally,” Strotham said.

She added that the levels were high as would be expected immediately following the incident.

“Next day it was all just about gone,” Strotham said.

While Fleishauer said the surface water testing standards are set by the state health department rather than DEP, he did say the initial numbers were considerably higher than would be allowed, but based on the results read to him over the phone by the Eagle, he surmised the quantities of fecal coliform were back to normal by Sunday.

Thompson said Douglass was not properly informed by other city staffers that these tests were being taken.

Douglass said Wednesday evening that Thompson was briefed on the results of the lab tests verbally.

“I should have had the correct information. I am sorry I did not. I will double check my information before finalizing my answers,” Douglass said.

Thompson and Douglass said they did not know how a resident obtained the results before the city did.

Douglass said she, Thompson and Bradshaw didn’t see the results until nearly 5 p.m., Wednesday.

Thompson and Douglass would not confirm as of Thursday afternoon who might have misled Douglass concerning inquires she alleges to have made on the Eagle’s behalf.

There were three samples taken Friday about 9:30 a.m. or about three hours after the spill. Samples were taken at the point where the sewage entered the water, upstream and downstream, Douglass said.

The sample results are reported in CFUs (colony forming units) and the number of CFUs is related to the viable number of bacteria in the sample, she wrote in an e-mail to the Eagle Wednesday.

The state standard is 800 CFUs for surface water and Friday morning’s test results showed 37,000 CFUs at the point of the spill, 67,000 CFUs upstream and 280,000 downstream.

“This would be expected as the sampling was from a sewage spill,” Douglass said.

One of the tests taken by the city is not legally permissible, she added, because Friday afternoon samples were taken, but not tested within the six hour limit, so are helpful but not absolutes. The results were all 100 CFUs.

Samples were taken Saturday that indicate levels of 100 CFUs at two locations and 800 CFUs at one location. All three samples from Sunday were 100 CFUs.

Richie’s hope on Friday that high tidal activity was working on the Island’s side to naturally flush the waste, seems to have occurred, results indicate.

Check marconews.com for updates on the issue. Supporting documents are in a sidebar on this page.

  • Email
  • Discuss
  • Share »
  • Print

Related Stories

Comments » 13

playballonK writes:

State authorities need to question Mizz Ritchie.

islandman4now writes:

so have they lifted the swimming ban in the area? thank you kelly farrell for staying on this! and thank you for the mention in the story of where the test results were located on the page. many people do not look for attachments. maybe we should hire someone at the city whose job it will be to stay on top of these situations and have responsibility for the public notification of potential hazards and when they have abated.

bankerguynaples writes:

None of this stonewalling and misinformation from the city or anyone else ever happened when investigative reporter Ed Bania and editor Tom Rife was with the Eagle until they both quit last year. Pardon the pun but Bania never put up with any crap.

shadow writes:

so...if you went swimming in the canal lisa says it's ok...others say it was not ok...why weren't the people who live on landmark waterway notified of the potential danger...what say you ms. richie?

marcoislandres writes:

Thompson said Douglass was not properly informed by other city staffers that these tests were being taken.

Thompson and Douglass said they did not know how a resident obtained the results before the city did.

Maybe the resident who obtained the results works for the City.

islandman4now writes:

visitors come to town and take the kids fishing off the dock not knowing what lurks in the waters.

25yearsonmarco writes:

Ms.Richie still working part time for the City? or has she graduated to a full time job? I agree with playballonK: Ms. Richie needs to answer questions from State Authority- and Ms. Douglass needs to answer some questions also- Ms. Douglass didn't know about the test(s) plural- not one? interesting.

shadow writes:

again..i am truly amazed that the city mgr neglected to address this issue in his "weekly report"...will the city alert the neighborhood residents the next time this happens? i mean 18,000 gallons is alot of poop and some of it has to go into the canal...we worry about the owls, the eagles, and the manatees....what about the people! we get door notices when the water mains break...why in the world wouldn't we get one when the poop main breaks? i am mystified..as usual...happy holidays all.

hourigan82247 writes:

One word...GRAVITY. Of course the sewerage infested the aquafiers and canals. Don't need some unqualified B.S.er telling us everything OK !

JohninMarco writes:

What concerns me most is the lack of any credibility from the city's statements. The story the city is putting out reads like a cheap dime store novel.

annaray writes:

Pass the buck and cover up!
Par for the course on Marco.

loscabos writes:

Why is there a Lisa Douglas anyway? I have nothing against her personally. The position came about when the evaluation of Moss pointed out his lack of communicating well enough. He thought,"you want better communication?",, for $100,000 (plus or minus) of taxpayers money for salary and benefits you get Lisa. Now Thompson, seems to be communicating well enough through bulletins, speeches, etc. "Why keep Lisa Mr. Thompson", Stand or Fall on your own."

STONECRAB writes:

DONT WORRY THE PROPERTY OWNERS,"NOW ALSO ALOT OF BANKS" WILL PAY FOR ALL THEIR MISTAKES.THAT IS YOU IN CASE YOUR WONDERING.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Features