Home › Island News › Local News
Marco councilman shares pros of incorporating with Pelican Bay residents
STORY TOOLS
RELATED STORIES
- Some still want Pelican Bay to become a city
- Whispers heard, but Marco candidates deny, plan to disincorporate
More Local News
- Alternative revenue sources may be answer to Marco's property tax shortfall
- Vacation for procreation returns to Marco Island
- Marco's Code Board gives stiff fines for repeat offenders
Share and Enjoy [?]
Mike Minozzi knows a thing or two about incorporation.
Minozzi, who serves as chairman of the Marco Island City Council, has lived on Marco since before the city became just that.
He’s seen the transformation, and on Wednesday night he told Pelican Bay community members that he would almost always recommend incorporation.
“The fact is, you can, with less money, do a lot of things. The main reason we were able to do (everything we’ve done), was we were managing our own destiny,” Minozzi said. “For Marco Island, it was a very, very important step to incorporate. It was a lot of work in the very beginning, but we are very fortunate.”
Minozzi was invited Wednesday night to answer questions as part of an ongoing series of town hall meetings to discuss incorporation of the North Naples community. The meetings are meant to outline the pros and cons of becoming a city, and Wednesday’s meeting gave residents a chance to ask questions of someone who has been through the process.
Marco Island residents voted to incorporate in 1997, more than 15 years after the community first began discussing the possibility. The vote was close, with about 51 percent of the community’s registered voters voting in favor on incorporating.
It took six tries before voters decided to incorporate. The first vote, taken in 1980, failed 516 votes to 2,010 votes; while the fifth vote, a mail-in ballot in 1993, failed 2,348 votes to 3,368 votes.
Minozzi said that, by 1997, residents had had enough and were ready to take fate into their own hands.
“The county had simply, I’m talking about totally, neglected us,” Minozzi said.
By 1997, Minozzi said the roads and drainage systems were in desperate need of upgrades, and county zoning standards at the time meant an increased density on the small island. The straw that broke the camel’s back, Minozzi said, was when $2 million set aside to repair the city’s bridges was taken away and used for other road work throughout the county.
“Marco Island had been totally, totally neglected by Collier County,” at that point, Minozzi said.
Since incorporating, the city has created its own police and fire departments, purchased its own utility system and is installing sewers throughout the city.
But Minozzi said the city’s crowning jewel is its lower tax rate.
“Since we’ve become a city our taxes have been cut, and we’ve reduced our millage rate,” he said Wednesday night. “We’ve reduced our out-of-pocket taxes each year for the last five years. While our main source of income is the ad valorem taxes, it still only represents about half of what we spend.”
While Minozzi’s presentation showed off all the positives of incorporation, Pelican Bay residents and owners in attendance expressed their desire to hear a differing opinion.
“I was of the opinion we were going to hear another side of incorporation,” Pelican Bay resident Bob Sanchez said.
Many of the residents who stepped up to the microphone Wednesday night said they needed more information before they could decide whether to authorize a feasibility study, which is needed before the community can proceed with incorporation.
“I’m more inclined to go through with the process,” Pelican Bay resident Charles Bodo said. “But I think if a straw poll was taken now, it would go down.”
Previous attempts to incorporate or annex into the city of Naples have failed, said Gerhard Seblatnigg, chairman of the incorporation steering committee.
Located on the city of Naples’ northern border, Pelican Bay sits on about 2,500 acres west of U.S. 41 and has 6,700 property owners, more than 14,000 residents and about 5,800 registered voters. The community is built out and is mostly residential.
The most recent incorporation talks began about a year after the city of Naples told Pelican Bay it would not annex the community into Naples’ city limits.
Pelican Bay officials took the first steps toward incorporation in November, when they hired Florida Gulf Coast University’s Florida Institute of Government and LaRue Planning and Management Services to research incorporation. The contract was for more than $13,000, of which the Pelican Bay Foundation paid for about half.
If residents choose to move forward with incorporation in 2009, they would need to have all of the information concerning incorporation available to the state by December.
The next incorporation town hall meeting is set for 7 p.m. March 18 at the Hammock Oak Community Center in Pelican Bay.

Comments
This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below — responsibility lies with the relevant reader alone. Read our privacy policy & user agreement.
good for minozzi....blowing his horn....it cannot be done without raising your costs...who is he kidding...police/fire/ alone....we're still paying a fortune for the collier cty sherif's dept....minozzi is and absolute/certibiable idiot....there is no way you can incorporate/become a city cheaper than what you have now.....no way!!!!
#1 Posted by van on February 13, 2008 at 10:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Marco Island has NOT lowered our taxes. It has lowered our "TAX RATE", but with the huge increase in taxable property values, the city has enjoyed windfall tax dollars for years. This is exactly the type of hocus pocus that causes people to get upset.
With property values plummeting and people moving away in record numbers, let's see what happens to the tax rate this year. Of course, Mr. Minnozi won't be in office this year to take the responsibility for a tax rate increase.
Bob Brown
#2 Posted by rcbauburn on February 14, 2008 at 6:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Minozzi didn't "raise" taxes. That said, if Minozzi was an honest man, he would admit that the City of Marco Island has increased it's budget and expenditures proportionately for several years with consistant revenue increases resulting from property value increases. Tax increases were not necessary and tiny tax decreases actually reulted in our citizens paying more taxes,not less. Now that our property values are falling is he willing to stop spending or at least slow it down? No, because he has approved creative utility rate increases and new franchise fees to fill the gap. Reality is we the citizens of Marco Island are paying more and the City is spending more. The people have spoken, they like this type of government and they shouldn't complain when their utility rates continue to go up and existing and new service fees are implimented to pay for all the wonderful things they are about to get. Things that our city cannot do without, or so we are told. In addition Minozzi intends to replace Jolley bridge for us even though it has a remaining life of 40 years! Why? because Minozzi wants to. Besides it would be nice to have a new bridge to compliment our renovated Collier Blvd. How do we pay for it? Why with a toll of course. What a guy.
#3 Posted by Lolala on February 14, 2008 at 2:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)
You folks can't even let up when he is talking to another group. Everything he said IS true, you just can't comprehend it. The Jolley bridge does NOT have a useful life of 40 years, plus four laning would make this a much nicer place to get on and off of. Tax rates have gone down. Just because property values have gone up, your taxes have gone up, but now the same people complain that their values are falling. You can't have it both ways.
Property values are falling not because of anythng the city did, but because of speculators and the overall economy. Did not any of you folks notice that we are in the worst credit crisis in memory and 40% of the homes in LAS VEGAS are in foreclosure. There is no data at all to show "people moving away in record numbers" however I would be very happy if the three above would move away.
#4 Posted by lovemarco on February 18, 2008 at 11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The Jolley bridge has a rating of 81. That means that it has an expected useful life span of 20 to 40 years. At least that is what the facilitator told the participants at a focus group that was sponsored by Collier County. If you don't believe me, ask Counciman elect Waldack, I understand he was a participant. Who are we to believe? Someone named "lovemarco" with an agenda or an engineer paid for by the County?
#5 Posted by Hawke1 on February 18, 2008 at 5:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)