Next council to set scene for new Marco manager

Something as seemingly inconsequential as a month’s delay in searching for Marco Island’s new city manager caused a whirlwind of conversation at Monday’s meeting, all boiling down to one thing: whether to let to new guys do the dirty work.

Should the next Marco City Council set the stage for the search determining the island’s new city manager?

See the results »

View previous polls »

In the end, City Council opted to allow the new council, as it is elected Jan. 29, to set the stage for the search determining Marco Island’s second-ever city manager in its 10-year history. At the March 17 meeting, after the new council members are sworn in, the seven-member body will undertake the task of narrowing a field of 12 to 18 candidates down to eight or nine.

That will allow the council to make a final decision in early- to mid-April. Interim City Manager Tony Shoemaker, who started work in December, has agreed to work in the city for no longer than six months.

It may not seem like much, but the decision cedes control of the entire hiring process to the council as it will stand in March, following a hotly contested election waged bitterly over four open council seats.

The race has the potential to tip the balance of the council from a majority supporting the island-wide sewering project to one that opposes it. Four of the eight candidates are running under a platform that promises to end the project, while the other four have promised to complete it.

While that one issue only hints at the fissures in the island’s political community, there are other questions of how the new councilors would approach the position of city manager. Some running have been openly critical in the past of former city manager Bill Moss’ management style, arguing that he was too domineering over his council.

At Monday’s meeting, some councilors expressed concern that a shift in the chemistry of the council could affect the kinds of manager candidates the city attracts. In fact, those concerns have dominated discussion of the city’s search for a manager to replace Moss, who recently left for the same office in Naples.

“We’re walking a very thin line between the seven of us that are sitting here now and the seven of us that will be sitting here in March,” said Councilor Ted Forcht.

He expressed concern that allowing the current council even to narrow the pool of candidates would perhaps yield a slate of potential managers unsuitable for work with the newly elected council.

Tom Freijo, senior vice president of search firm The Mercer Group, came armed with two possible schedules for the search process. In the end, the council asked Freijo to fuse the two together, allowing the new council to get the hiring process underway without delay, but preventing any confusing overlapping in decision-making that might result if the new and old councils were both involved in the process.

Freijo mentioned the possibility of allowing members of both the current council and the council-elect to make the hiring decisions. However, that idea was nixed with a vehement rejection by Councilor Glenn Tucker, who has repeatedly aired his discomfort with the idea of the councilors-elect voting before ever being sworn in.

“I have begged to have this process postponed,” Tucker said. “As long as I’m on this council, that won’t happen.”

Though the council voted unanimously to approve the timeline — as well as the salary range of $150,000 to $180,000 — not everyone was satisfied with the compromise.

Council Candidate Roger Hall blasted the council for undertaking any decisions whatsoever on the hiring process. He argued for the city not to engage in the search at all until March, once the new council is in place.

“This is the craziest thing I ever heard of,” he said. “If there was any common sense here, we would simply defer this whole thing until the elections take place. Let those (new councilors) make their own decision. I just think that trying to push your imprint on the next city manager is wrong.”

© 2008 All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Discuss
  • Print

Related Stories

Comments » 4

SmokeyJoe writes:

AA The new Council should make all decisions on the hiring of a new City Manager including the salary range and benefits. If you add the salary and benefits together, it comes to well over $200,000.00. Also the new Council may want to change the present duties of the new Manager to make sure that the Manager works at the direction of the Council and not the way it is now with the manager making the major decisions and putting them before the Council for endorsement without giving the Elected Council Members various options and the advantage or disadvantage of each option. Also, all Contracts should be awarded by the elected Council and not the Manager.

jwputnam writes:

How about we start at around $100,000? Are you people nuts?

happy6 writes:

john...unfornutely you can't find one of these guys for that amount of $$. moss set the bar and the council went along with it and gave raises and bonuses. i went to the "city mgrs" web site and discovered that the salary for a city 1-2 million is appx 200k.....i will never understand why we have to pay so much for our population....except that when you have more construction than is in NY has to pay.

Lolala writes:

Van you have just given me all the reason I need to convince my neighbors to vote for change. That fellow sucked all he could out of this community and then when the going got tuff, he went north to get even more money. Throw the bums out is what I say.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.