It’s the Law: Florida condominium act gets revisions — part III

  • Email
  • Discuss
  • Share »
  • Print
  • A
  • A
  • A

Q: Did the 2008 Legislature make any changes to the Condominium Act?

A: For the past two weeks this column summarized many of the major changes to the Condominium Act by the 2008 Legislature, most of which are effective October 1, 2008.

The Division has been given additional powers to protect associations and owners. The Division may order restitution from a developer. If a developer fails to pay the award within thirty days after the deadline for appeal, the Division may bring a court action to enforce the award and my also temporarily revoke its acceptance of the developer’s filing for the condominium to which the restitution relates until payment is made.

The Division has had authority to impose civil penalties against officers or board members who willfully and knowingly violate the Condominium Act, a rule adopted under the Act or final decision of the Division. Under the amended Act, it is granted additional authority to order removal of an officer or director and to prohibit such person from serving as an officer or director for such violations. If a unit owner presents the Division with proof that the unit owner has requested official records in writing by certified mail and the association has not provided the records within ten days and, after which time the unit owner made a second request by certified mail and more than ten days has elapsed without provisions of records, the Division must issue a subpoena requiring production.

Anyone who has purchased a condominium from a developer knows that the Act required substantial mandatory disclosure from developers. The Act also requires disclosure by non-developers on resale of condominium units.

Under the Condominium Act, non-developer sellers must provide, at the seller’s expense, a current copy of the Declaration, Articles of Incorporation of the Association, By-Laws and Rules of the association, financial information and a document entitled “Frequently Asked Questions and Answers” if requested by a purchaser. The purchaser has three business days after receipt of the documents within which to terminate contract with the seller.

The list of documents that a non-developer must provide upon request is expanded effective January 1, 2009 to include copy of a governance form. The form is to be provided by the Division and summarize governance of condominium associations.

Apparently, the Legislature feels that buyers need to be informed of certain aspects of condominium government, as the governance form to be prepared by the Division is to address (1) role of the board in conducting day-to-day affairs, (2) the board’s responsibility to provide advance notice of board and membership meetings, (3) rights of owners to attend and speak at board and membership meetings, (4) responsibility of the board and of owners with respect to maintenance, (5) responsibility of the board and owners to abide by the condominium documents, the Condominium Act, rules adopted by the Division and reasonable rules adopted by the board, (6) owners rights to inspect and copy association records and limitations on those rights, (7) remedies available to owners with respect to actions by the board which may be abusive or beyond the board’s power and authority, (8) right of the board to hire a property management firm subject to its own primary responsibility for such management, (9) responsibility of owners with regard to payment of regular or special assessments and the potential consequences of failure to pay, (10) voting rights of owners, and (11) rights and obligations of the board and enforcement of rules in the condominium documents and rules adopted by the board.

The governance form is also to include the following statement in conspicuous type.

“This publication is intended as an informal educational overview of condominium governance. In the event of a conflict, the provisions of Chapter 718, Florida Statutes, rules adopted by the Division of Florida Land Sales, Condominiums and Mobile Homes of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, the provisions of the condominium documents, and reasonable rules adopted by the condominium association’s board of administration prevail over the contents of this publication.”

The 2008 Legislature was more active in the condominium area than it has been in a number of years. It will be important for condominium owners to become familiar with the new rules before they become effective. It will be even more important for directors, managers and condominium attorneys to be educated.

When new statutes are adopted, there can be confusion and questions about meaning and intent. That means good legal advice in this area will be elevated in importance. Associations that merely continue business as usual may face serious problems.

---

William G. Morris is a lawyer with offices at 247 N. Collier Blvd., Marco Island. The column is not intended to be legal advice for specific circumstances. General questions can be sent by e-mail to wgmorrislaw@earthlink.net or by fax to (239) 642-0722. Read other columns at http://www.wgmorris.com.

© 2008 marconews.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Email
  • Discuss
  • Share »
  • Print

Comments » 3

boredmember writes:

We are in need of help/direction with our Master Association:Oakland Forest Property Association, POA governing our 7 FL homeowner associations. Your Q & A has been so helpful but we din't know if it would translate to a Master's Board. They have fired our management company and maintain the books themselves. They are trying to 'take over' one of the association (who do not wish to sue the MA but may be forced to...) where do I begin? Any assistance would be greatly appreciated! Regards; Barbara Dague

clk writes:

Do condo associations and board members have the right to increase a security deposit required by a tenant currently occupying the unit? Also...I thought owners had the right to vote, or should I say the chance to get to the meeting to vote. Do we not have the right to an opinion in condo rule changes. Our board does not give us ( out of state owners) enough advance notice so that we are able to get to a meeting to vote. The last meeting I got the notice the day before the meeting.
It seems financially we ( owners that reside out of state) are getting discriminated upon. Most of us would not have the units rented if it weren't not only for this market but due to their constantly increasing and adding fees. I would think there would be some regulation on how much they can raise your fees. when we bought our association fee was around $430.00 I would have to look it up to be exact now it is in the neighborhood of $800.00 and this is since 2005 is this legal? Should we not be getting a report on where this money is spent? I have nothing

devon writes:

I am hoping someone can help me with an answer to my situation. I live in a condominium in West Palm Beach, Florida. A common element pipe broke, ruined all of my kitchen cabinets, and I was left to pay/replace them. My condo documents say that an Owner is not liable for damages caused by a common element. The attorney for the building is saying that I am misinterpreting that statement. Has anyone else been in this situation? If so, can you please fill me in on the outcome of your situation.

Much thanks, Devon

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features