Login | Contact Us | Feedback | Customer Service | Site Map | Archives | RSS | Subscribe to the paper

HomeIsland NewsLocal News

Politics get personal at Marco City Council meeting

Bridge repairs delayed for parks and recreation events in budget trimming session

— At times Monday’s City Council meeting discussions sounded more like election campaigning than a session to wrap up the city’s budget.

Some of the most recognizable names in Marco Island’s political process seemed to be dragged through the mud at one point or another in the two-part meeting.

A public records request by resident Bill McMullan for e-mails between former city councilor John Arceri and all city officials, which yielded 600 e-mails posted on eyeonmarco.com, snowballed into rebuttals and counter-attacks.

At a previous meeting, McMullan said the e-mails raised concerns about “fraud” and a behind-the-scenes puppet master, Arceri, who appeared to tell city staff, including Public Works Director Rony Joel and Public Information Coordinator Lisa Douglass, what to do and how to do it. Arceri and Councilor Jerry Gibson followed up by saying the unfounded allegations were nothing more than personal attacks.

Douglass said the communications plan that Arceri commented on in the e-mail used as evidence of his “puppeteering” was a plan written by her in advance of correspondence with Arceri.

“What is so hard to accept is that I put in over 100 hours of free consulting time (valued at over almost $50,000 at my present consulting rate) helping my city at their request and get demonized by people as being part of some conspiracy, some part of personal agenda,” Arceri said.

Since the release of the e-mails, more officials have switched from playing defense to playing offense. Councilor Chuck Kiester said he was personally offended by a letter from Arceri to City Attorney Alan Gabriel.

“Mr. Arceri has now moved on to direct the city attorney to determine as to whether Mr. Arceri has a legal case against me. Who is in charge here? It certainly isn’t City Council,” Kiester said.

In a letter to the City Council’s attorney, Arceri accused Kiester of spreading hate and suspicion about his involvement in electric studies and negotiations. He also asked Gabriel for a formal legal opinion of the e-mails.

Kiester and McMullan have both subsequently said there appears to be the possibility of Sunshine Law violations in the e-mails, including an e-mail from Arceri to City Council sharing Councilor Frank Recker’s idea to set up a committee to study a city takeover of the electric company, Lee County Electric Cooperative.

Gabriel said he has found no violations of law in any of this so far.

While Kiester said there may not be enough evidence of Sunshine Law violations to hold up in court, he said he was primarily concerned that no one other than the city manager should be directing staff of how to do their daily jobs.

“I think we have a good grasp on that. I can understand the concerns,” City Manager Steve Thompson replied.

The special-called meeting in the afternoon was set to cut about $1 million from the budget, including a $50,000 reduction in legal fees. The reduction is planned to come from limiting attorney presence at planning board meetings.

There seemed to be few winners in the meeting which closed with scarcely one political name left unscathed.

Jose Granda, Chairman of the Code Enforcement Board accused Marco Island Taxpayer Association President Fay Biles of bigotry for alleging that his letter about putting electric lines underground was written by Arceri, adding that just because he “speaks with a funny accent” doesn’t mean he is not capable of authoring a well-written letter.

Biles said she felt personally attacked by Granda, who she said falsely accused MITA of contributing to election campaigns, which is contrary to MITA’s bylaws.

MITA member Linda McCune also said she “felt harassed” by name calling such as “malcontents and CAVE dwellers, citizens against virtually everything.”

All involved demanded apologies, but the only one who came close was Arceri. Chairman Bill Trotter said he regretted not addressing McMullan’s “false” allegations head on at the last meeting.

Council was able to continue with business and, if there was a turning point in the mood of the meeting, it likely occurred as Recker recommended the city find a way to continue funding youth, teen and family events needed to foster community spirit in a down economy.

Council unanimously approved funding for all city-sponsored parks and recreation events and full funding of YMCA swimming lessons. They approved limited cuts for community sponsored events and a new process by which organizations can apply for grants.

In order to fund an additional $50,000 for community events while compensating for the reduction in the millage rate, among other things, council decided to trim bridge repairs by $228,400.

Joel said the cuts would likely allow the Kendall Drive bridges to be repaired and may minimize or delay repairs to the Caxambas Bridge and the bridge on Hernando Drive. Remaining in this year’s budget is $2.25 million for bridge repairs and $500,000, which will be set aside for the future replacement of the two Smokehouse Bay bridges.

Other reductions from the initial $14.5 million general fund budget included a reduction in staff raises from 4 percent to 3 percent. In June, City Council approved a 4 percent raise and an additional 1 percent raise to be given at Thompson’s discretion for any city staff who implemented cost saving measures. This 1 percent cost savings incentive is no longer addressed in the budget. The change from 4 percent to 3 percent represents a $75,000 cut in the budget.

City Finance Director Bill Harrison said a process will be created to give staff who implement cost saving measures raises.

Also instead of hiring five new employees, three positions will be added to the fire department in January, saving $75,000 in over time and therefore contributing $75,000 to the 2009 budget. Fire Chief Mike Murphy said the ongoing cost of the three firemen will be about $200,000 annually after 2009.

While much was accomplished despite multiple allegations and name-calling, issues left unresolved included Kiester’s question of how $25,000 for an electric municipalization consultant is now budgeted at $75,000.

Joel said “it was never $25,000” and until the scope of the consultant’s work is determined it is unknown what the actual cost will be. He said the consultant recommended by blind votes from the municipalization committee will be announced in a matter of days, with City Council making the final decision at a November meeting.

Council voted 5-2 to lower the electric franchise fee on electric bills from 5 percent to 3.6 percent beginning January 2009. The fees will generate more than $1.5 million with $1 million to pay for debt for putting Collier Boulevard electric lines underground and an additional $500,000 not yet allocated, but possibly going toward putting lines underground in the future — as the fee was initially set to be used for in the 2005 ordinance. Councilors Forcht, Kiester and Recker have questioned the timing, given the national economic crisis, but council has yet to formally take another vote on the issue.

In other matters council voted to:

– Approve Marco Island Historical Society’s request for city-owned dirt from the Marco Shore’s facility to be used for construction of the Marco Island Historical Museum under the condition MIHS pays for testing the dirt fill for quality. (7-0)

– Approve on second reading an ordinance to establish grease damage prevention regulations for restaurants to protect the waste water utility from backing up. (7-0)

– Approve on first reading an ordinance to amend the beach management and vessel control ordinance with the condition that the 14-year-old age limit for motorized water vessel operation be reviewed before second reading. (7-0)

– Approve a 10-year water supply facilities work plan as required by the state to be worked into the city’s comprehensive plan. (7-0)

– Appoint Larry Magel of Hideaway Beach to the nine-member Coastal Advisory Committee created in 2001 to share recommendations with the Board of Collier County Commissioners and Tourist Development Council on areas affected by coastal erosion. (7-0)

– Maintain a $56,000 lien accrued from code enforcement fines and a sewer assessment against 625 Dorando Court, foreclosed by Countrywide Home Loans. (7-0)

– Approve assessment resolutions for Gulfport, East Winterberry and Southeast Winterberry sewer assessment areas. (5-2)

– Approve a resolution to reimburse up to $65 million of capital improvements, including expansion of the wastewater treatment plant to five million gallons per day, construction of the deep injection well and sewer construction projects, with proceeds of future bond issued financing. (5-2)

Comments

This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below — responsibility lies with the relevant reader alone. Read our privacy policy & user agreement.


Kiester talks about possible Sunshine violations?? That's a topic he should be an expert on since the courts found him guilty of same. I watch Monday night at the fights (council meetings)on cable and can't believe that people are complaining about our city council being unprofessional. Every letter to the editor is written by the same handful of people complaining and name calling. Just about everyone that speaks at the podium is complaining and name calling. When council defends themselves all the naysayers claim they are mistreated. Oh my Lord!!!! If you can dish it out you better be able to take it; I think our council has had it with the double standard!

#1 Posted by Richard_Gibke on October 7, 2008 at 1:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Thank You Richard !!!!! I would love to see more of us taking a more vocal, active role in our Island politics. Especially when it comes to providing facts and support to the Council. Too much of what they hear is total fabrication and incomplete stories. Just keep reminding all of us that a Landslide Majority of citizens elected the majority this Council. And they are representing us the best they can, given the current economics.
Ed Issler

#2 Posted by lauralbi1 on October 7, 2008 at 3:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)

For a bunch of people who are already as old as the hills, it's time to grow up.

#3 Posted by Eagleeye on October 7, 2008 at 5:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Ed has moved on from more than 70 percent to a landslide majority. good move Ed

#4 Posted by dc5799 on October 7, 2008 at 6:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I thought that after the election the negativity would stop but some people still countinue to attack our city. Misinformation is still the rule for some speakers. It's about time council stood up for themselves!

#5 Posted by Flowerpower on October 7, 2008 at 9:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Arceri should step out of the picture. Wow - I wish I could charge his consulting fees, and to think he gives this to our city FREE! nothing is FREE. and most of us who have lived on this island have seen enough damage done by Arceri and his puppets, sorry- I am one of the complainers, and I will continue to complain until our City Council starts acting without the FREE council and our City is ran for the Citizens. Our city does a good job at many things, we are in a down economy and we all need relief and we do not need the FREE?? advice from Arceri.. sorry Ed.. I do not support your friend. I support a democracy where we can complaint, and brainstorm, and work together, and speak our minds!, and resolve community issues and not be controlled by a few individuals. This is the Council and City that I will support, one that listens to the complaints and compliments and does what the majority of residents care about.

#6 Posted by 25yearsonmarco on October 7, 2008 at 10:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)

This fellow is some kind of volunteer is he? Seems to me he has found a way to avoid being culpable for any damage his ideas may cause. He can always say, not me. Pretty neat set up. His surrogates on the Council get to give him cover. Why doesn't the city try and be more transparent? Give him a personal services contract and pay him a token $1.00 an hour whenever he does something for us. At least that way, he can be held accountable. The Lord knows, many of our Council members have no clue as to what this fellow is actually up to. Say, one of his great ideas result in citizens losing their homes because of emminent domain. Or have to sell out and leave Marco because one of his ideas made it too costly to live here. Then the Council can at least point to this fellow and say he fooled us, we didn't know. His present deal is simply to pat for me. He has found a way to eat his cake, regurgitate it and serve a portion to each Council member. Too much sleeze to sort through. Just some thoughts.

#7 Posted by Fossil on October 8, 2008 at 8:01 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Keister, ummm, seems appropriate for his name!!

He stated City Employess do a good job, but should be glad they have a jo? Who is he to talk down to these people, good or bad??The real problem with many of these councilors is that they are clearly over their heads when it comes to an understanding of their role in the government process!!!

#8 Posted by August8 on October 8, 2008 at 10:54 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Obviously the economy is not affecting Mr. Arceri's imaginary consulting rates. He has raised them from $350 per hour to $500 per hour in the last month. Maybe the city should buy Mr. Arceri for what he is actually worth and sell him for what he thinks he is worth and all the city's financial problems would disappear.

#9 Posted by flyingsparks on October 8, 2008 at 2:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I forgot one important part....."Just some thoughts"....

#10 Posted by flyingsparks on October 8, 2008 at 2:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Flyingsparks: You really know nothing for which you speak. I know for a fact that Mr. Arceri recently testified for a utility in Court, as an expert witness, and received his hourly rate. What youi and all the other uninformed people above do not know is that City Staff asked Mr. Arceri for his assistance, in the form of Volunteerism, on the utility issues. But this will come out soon enough. If Mr. Kiester or Mr. McMullan had any interest in the truth, they would have asked Rony Joel about the e-mails in the first place.
Ed Issler

#11 Posted by lauralbi1 on October 8, 2008 at 2:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Ed I am sure if Mr. McMullan left a massage for Rony Joel about the e-mails he would still be waiting for a call back.

#12 Posted by marcoislandres on October 8, 2008 at 5:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)

If the council continues to allow past leaders to run the city, the same devisive situation will continue. The economic clock is ticking and residents have had it with the constant fighting. It is clear that neither the council nor the city manager can control the behind the scenes leaders.

#13 Posted by JohninMarco on October 8, 2008 at 5:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Congratulations goes out to Ed Issler, this years winner of the John Arceri look-alike contest. Good going ,Ed!

#14 Posted by hourigan82247 on October 9, 2008 at 11:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)

(This comment was removed by the site staff.)

#15 Posted by hourigan82247 on October 9, 2008 at 11:34 a.m.

McMullan keeps throwing punches and now council is hitting back. If he can't take the heat he should get out of the kitchen. With a history like his it's amazing he still shows his face in public!

#16 Posted by ejburger on October 11, 2008 at 4:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)

No, Hourigan, I just get involved and know what is going on at City Hall. I suggest many of you that wish to post emotional or fictional statements do the same. Our City would be better off for it.
Ed Issler

#17 Posted by lauralbi1 on October 13, 2008 at 8:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)



Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn: