Marco's Parks and Recreation Director Dana Souza resigns

  • Email
  • Discuss
  • Share »
  • Print
  • A
  • A
  • A
Serving as Interim City Manager through mid-May, Parks and Recreation Director Dana Souza packed to move from his office in City Hall back to his trailer in Mackle Park. Souza has since formally resigned from the position as of Thursday morning and plans to have to pack a box once again as his last day will be in one month.

Photo by KELLY FARRELL, Staff
Buy this photo »

Serving as Interim City Manager through mid-May, Parks and Recreation Director Dana Souza packed to move from his office in City Hall back to his trailer in Mackle Park. Souza has since formally resigned from the position as of Thursday morning and plans to have to pack a box once again as his last day will be in one month.

— The City of Marco Island is about to experience what many feel is a great loss.

The resignation of Parks and Recreation Director Dana Souza has Islanders talking not only about the loss of Souza, but also about what prompted him to leave.

Souza confirmed he would be departing the city he loves for a new start in Greenville, SC.

“I’ve never been welcomed into a community the way I was welcomed in Marco. I feel that same warmth I felt when I first came here,” Souza said as he began informing friends and coworkers of his decision Wednesday.

He added that he is looking forward to working for the larger Greenville parks and recreation department.

“In the short time I had to get to know Greenville’s City Manager, Jim Bourey, I gained a tremendous amount of respect for him. It will be a completely different experience than Marco Island,” Souza said.

He added that he will stay in Marco Island for one month to provide a transition plan, and added, “I don’t want to leave anything a mess for anyone … ”

City Manager Steve Thompson said: “Dana is a great guy and he did a great job, but it is his choice to move on to other opportunities.”

While it’s not on Monday’s City Council agenda, the dynamics that caused Souza to leave may become the top issue.

Chairman Bill Trotter said he did not believe Souza's decision to leave was initiated by Thompson and said it was likely just a career move.

“(Souza) will be a great loss to the city … It’s sort of between him and Steve Thompson. I certainly hoped the city could hold on to him,” Chairman Bill Trotter said.

Trotter praised Souza’s performance as interim city manager, his strong connection with the community, his work ethic and effective development and management of the city’s parks and recreation department.

The City Charter states that the city manager is responsible for all personnel issues. City Council is only empowered to dismiss one city staffer, the city manager, and it would require approval by four councilors.

Former Councilor Terri DiSciullo and Councilor Frank Recker are among those who said they believe the loss of Souza is a poor reflection of the city manager.

“My concern is Monday’s meeting is going to be ghastly for Dana ... This can taint him for future jobs ... I worry this isn’t the approach (Council) should take in approaching an evaluation,” Thompson said.

Souza was put in a “predicament” after dealing with difficult issues while serving as interim city manager, Recker said.

“(Souza) was a strong interim city manager who laid down the law and people weren’t happy with that,” DiSciullo said.

While Souza was exiting the position of interim city manager, he drafted a “transition report” for Thompson to review. Souza raised several financial and staff concerns in this transition report.

“I believe there are management and oversight issues in (the finance) department. I believe these issues could include management apathy, a practice of cleaning up project account overruns versus managing project accounts, unauthorized moving of expenditures from account to account and misleading City Council when asking for contract approvals,” Souza wrote to Thompson.

Souza provided examples, including a request made in May by Public Works Director Rony Joel for a $9 million transfer from the 2009 budget to the 2008 budget. It was for a water project council approved in April. Council had not been advised that the project was not funded in the current year’s budget.

Souza said he also learned $600,000 was transferred from the general fund to the utility fund for the North Collier Boulevard project without council approval.

Souza told Thompson in the report that he found the North Collier Boulevard project was nearly $800,000 over budget.

Subsequently, a report released Monday by Finance Director Bill Harrison and Joel states the approximate $40 million Collier Boulevard reconstruction project was under budget by about $2.5 million.

“I didn’t find any violation of city policy or intent to deceive the City Council,” Thompson said Thursday regarding the concerns Souza raised in the report.

Thompson added that the “key difference was the finance director and utilities director were following direction of a previous city manager and I have no problem with that. The only thing we could have done better was communication with council.”

When Thompson was interviewed for the city manager position, councilors asked if he would support a new assistant city manager position, which Souza may fill in the future.

DiSciulo and Recker recalled that Thompson said he agreed to such a condition, particularly as it would allow for a smooth transition in the absence of the city manager.

Thompson however said that was “absolutely not the case. I would not make a commitment but I’d be open to it in the future and we were moving down the path of doing so.”

Only the city manager can create new staff positions, according to the City Charter.

Souza said the lack of movement up to assistant city manager played no part in his decision to seek employment outside the City of Marco Island.

During the budget process it was proposed that a new position of human resources director could be added and that the position could evolve into the assistant city manager position, Thompson said, adding that the proposal was later abandoned.

“I can’t even confirm that was ever in the plans,” Souza said Wednesday evening regarding his move into an assistant position.

Thompson suggested to council in a July 23 e-mail that he would prefer “water cooler and backyard cookout types of discussions” be the only communication between City Councilors and city employees. He included the reasoning that employees may not understand council’s inability to keep promises to staff.

Of Souza, Thompson said Tuesday that the director had never been reprimanded.

“ … We discussed your interest in moving on to a role as assistant city manager and I am interested in helping you do so,” Thompson wrote in a July 21 memo to Souza.

What followed were recommendations of what Souza needed to do in order for that to possibly happen, including completing his undergraduate and graduate degrees.

Thompson also wrote that Souza inappropriately considered guidance from utilities’ employees as being equal to public input.

Do not “forget the value of other directors within the city,” Thompson told Souza.

Thompson wrote to Souza in July that both he and Souza wanted to “hold staff accountable” for mistakes, adding “this effort cannot be possible for you if there is an underlying perception that you or I have a self-serving agenda or have alliances other than with the entire organization.”

Souza responded the same day.

“I need to state clearly that I have a deep commitment to the citizens of Marco Island … That is where my alliance rests,” he wrote.

Souza said he took offense to the accusation of having a “self-serving agenda.” He also wrote that he and Thompson “had no meaningful discussions about the intent to establish an assistant city manager position.”

Souza further rebutted any lack of respect of other directors’ input and suggested, despite his efforts, he was left out of meetings between Thompson and other department heads about issues that affected parks and recreation operations.

Souza rebutted allegations that he had contact with councilors regarding city matters and that since he returned to the position of the parks and recreation director he has “not focused any attention on these conflicts,” which arose while he served as interim city manager.

DiSciullo, a member of the Island Parks and Recreation Foundation, said that she is close friends with Souza and while it may be inappropriate for Souza to discuss issues with the current City Council, he may talk to his friends.

“This city will be losing a valued director due to the inaction of the current city manager … ,” DiSciullo said.

Councilor Chuck Kiester said he desired Souza become assistant city manager.

“(Souza) did more to help heal the wounds among our residents during his short term (as interim city manager) than anyone has done, past and present,” Kiester said.

Recker said he believes the loss of Souza will require at least a review of Thompson’s management style and performance.

“(Thompson) has a big bulldozer coming at him and I don’t feel sorry for him,” Recker said.

DiSciullo recommended “council do whatever it has to do to keep Dana.”

Thompson however said Souza’s acceptance of a career move “is a clear cut issue despite the passion people have for Dana.”

Souza has been in parks and recreation 25 years. He was instrumental in creating and staffing the parks and recreation department when it was incepted.

“I’ve had a fabulous time on Marco Island. This will be the hardest move I’ve ever had to make,” Souza said.

  • Email
  • Discuss
  • Share »
  • Print

Related Stories

Comments » 22

happyonmarco writes:

Dana, you will be missed. I hope Greenville doesn't just take and never give like Marco did.

Hmmmmmm.......another 5-2 vote that screwed over the residents of the city???? Recker, you voted for Thompson to be city manager, you can't possibly be second guessing your decision, can you?

The following is from the April 15th issue of the Marco Eagle:

":After a round of votes that revealed Thompson as the favorite over Steven Malloy by a 5-2 vote, the council took a vote to approve Thompson unanimously as the first pick. Councilors Ted Forcht and Chuck Kiester cast their ballots for Malloy."

The more I follow this city's circus, the more I wish the minority was the majority.

karenglaub writes:

I've always felt that Dana Souza has done a great job for the city, and I don't want to see him leave. I think he has exhibited good knowledge of what the city manager's duties are when he was serving as interim, showed strong leadership skills, and made people accountable for their actions. By all appearances, he communicated with the council well and performed that job as well as or better than anyone else with a degree. What more could you ask for?

marcoislandres writes:

You will be greatly missed here on Marco Island Dana, good luck in SC.

7ate9 writes:

Dana, integrity will get you no where on Marco.
Good luck in S.C. You will be missed.
Terri Desciullo should be our city manager.

bomall writes:

There's a shock, another good employee of Marco Island leaving. They will soon be left with all the mutts they want, because any good employee they have ever had, gets chased out. Good Luck Dana, you did a Great job in Marco and I hope SC knows what a great guy you are.

August8 writes:

Yes, Yes!!!!!!

He has been a great employee, and he has seved the city well, and he has contributed to the community, and yes he will be missed!
But, But,

Shound'nt he have the opportunity for self improvement and enrichment?

Put away the towels and dry those eyes, this is good for Mr. souza! Without a complete formal education he is not qualified for an assistant city manager position, regardless of his work and employment history. Please don't tiun this into whose out to get who, please. Mrs. Decullo is gone and she shared in that type of mentality, so let the times role and give Mr Souza a break and a very nice send-off!!!

Flowerpower writes:

Very sorry to see Dana leave but good for him and his career development. My question of concern is if the city charter says that councilors must stay out of personel issues then why are councilors Kiester and Recker putting themselves in the middle of this? And why is Terri involved in this at all? She is no longer a councilor.

playballonK writes:

BAM!! Hows that taste Marco?
Keep on drinking the Aceri coolaid, we'll drive this paradise into ground yet

MarcoFacts writes:

All the best Dana. Employees move on to greener pastures all the time. Now playballonk is blaming Arceri? Why does this community need a scapegoat? All employees are replaceable and so are village idiots like playballonk.

lauralbi1 writes:

To The City Council: While everyone wishes Dana the best, including myself, it is incumbent upon you to evaluate the choice you made for City Manager. Someone who tells City employees not to talk to Council, and someone that is secretive and someone trying to build an Empire may not be the right choice. If it is a question of Dana or the current City Manager, I would be hard pressed to choose the latter.
Ed Issler

shadow writes:

GO ED!

playballonK writes:

Gee, has anyone not figured out yet that MARCOFACTS is the bonehead himself-John Aceri?

Fossil writes:

playballonK, I can understand why you would believe Marcofacts and Arceri are one. However, I think you are wrong on your guess. I believe Marcofacts is RB and in debt to Arceri for something.

Fossil writes:

Sorry to see such a popular and effective employee go. Dana's departure is simply another example that our City Council is blind and deaf. They should have seen this coming and made policy changes allowing them some input or public discussion. That said, I can understand why Thompson insists on such tight control of his subordinates. No professional executive wants a subordinate to be speaking to a board member without reporting directly back. That is another argument for a strong citizen Mayor assisted by an Assistant professional excutive. What I don't understand is why Thompsom tolerates private citizens giving orders and free advice to his directors. There is something inconsistant in that management type. What favors does Thompson owe to those who enjoy such extrodinary access and influence? I would also like to know why Thompson didn't order an independant review of the fianancial health of the city. Afterall, his learned and common sense experience must tell him that any young city that goes through a spending spree like Marco Island did the past eight years needs a looksee. If for no other reason then to protect himself from future charges. I suspect after this move, he will be next to go.

lovelifeorelse writes:

Hmmmmm?!? Mr. Moss resigns for a fear anti-sewer council-candidates may be voted in. Then, Mr. Shoemaker does a poor job & "has a bike accident"!?! Then, Mr. Souza does exactly what is asked of him, his job, and while serving as interim City Manager he uncovers accounting practices that would make Bernie Ebbers of Worldcom smile!?! Yet again, Marco Island finds itself in an uncomfortable situation. The people of this great city need to stand up & say enough is enough. Stop electing clowns to serve on city council. This is not about Dana Souza's resignation; rather, it is about the corrupt business practices discovered at city hall's finance department, along with Rony Joel. Dana, you have done nothing but great things for Marco! Best of luck! We'll miss your leadership & dedication. Watch out Mr. Thompson, the target is on your back. You have failed yet again at your third straight city manager gig. Council, please do your homework before you select a puppeteer to orchestrate your madness. Also, the day that this story was released to the public (via internet), Marco Cable's Internet service was out. Did Mr. Thompson pull the the plug so the City was w/o Internet; in the interest that the accounting team could scramble like Watergate?!? Marco, be a City that your community is proud of.

August8 writes:

A whole lot of parinoia here????????????

The new manager has only been in place for a few months, made some fairly good decisions it would seem. So, he puts in place some common sense organizational guidelines and he gets criticised.
Perhaps some of the Island residents would prefer a mayor form of government, that would provide for the type of in-put and control that may please them, think about it???

WoolyBully writes:

What a joke this city government is. And all Collier County does is suck all of of your tax dollars. I say dissolve the City of Marco, and make the Island a state county. This would reduce taxes and provide better services to all. Why not!! We have the schools, a police and fire/EMS department, and water utility. Continue having LCEC as our electric provider and contract out jail services to the Collier County Sheriffs Dept. who we pay millions of dollars a year to with or no service.

shadow writes:

august8...dana was only in his job a "few" months and the facts of corruption hit him square between the eyes....steve has his eyes closed apparently.
at least with a matos we would have someone accountable as opposed to the ducking and dodging we have now.

rcbauburn writes:

Van has certainly hit the issue dead on. When Dana was asked to play the old shell game "which shell is the money hid under?", he told Mr Harrison and Mr Joel no until they document and could show City Council what was going on. Well, five months later with Mr Thompson, it is all still hid and it takes losing a great employee to expose this. My neighbor Mr Issler and I actually do agree on some things and this is definately one of them! (Post #10)
Bob Brown

August8 writes:

Ok then Van, ???????????????????????

Let's here what the corruption is factually about?????, perhaps we might understand a little better!!!!!!!!!!!

Fossil writes:

August8, that is exactly the point. We have smoke. The tax payers deserve to know who or what is responsible for the smoke. A responsible council will order the City Manager to conduct a comprehensive audit of all City financial matters during the past 5 years. The entire audit, must be presented to the Council along with it's findings and recommendations. Manager recommendations and options to resolve any issues presented in the findings must also be reported to the Council. The Council requires this audit to hold the manager responsible for his performance in this matter. The city can get to the bottem of this. A 2.5 million dollar error in accounting is inexcusable. Someone or something in our City is broken. Insist on fixing it or face even more serious problems in the future.

August8 writes:

Let It Go Folks!!!

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Features