Photo by KELLY FARRELL, Staff
Buy this photo »
Chief Code Enforcement Officer Eric Wardle inspects a seawall that came crumbling down after continued erosion from recent storms. The seawall at 81 Gulfport received a notice of violation and days later completely failed. The seawall is likely an original Delton Corp wall built about 30 years ago without a fully functional French drain to protect it from erosion.
Photo by KELLY FARRELL, Staff
Buy this photo »
Waterways Advisory Committee considers advising the Marco Island City Council of new permitting and inspection needs for seawalls. Original Deltona Corporation seawalls did not include French drains and as they reach or exceed their 30 year life span, they are failing more rapidly. City officials warn that although it may be expensive to replace or repair the seawalls, it may be even more costly not to.
MARCO ISLAND — The number of seawalls on Marco Island in significant disrepair continues to grow rapidly and the city is looking at how to prevent a community hazard as well as protect the community’s shrinking wallet.
The number of seawalls found in violation of code for poor maintenance or complete failure is looking to nearly double this year with more than 100 such violations in 2007 and nearly 175 so far this year, said Eric Wardle, the city’s chief code enforcement officer.
Seawall replacement costs upwards of $30,000, according to contractors — leaving inspectors and code officials checking their conscience when deciding when to require a resident to replace a seawall at risk of failure.
“We left off on this issue (of seawalls) last year acknowledging that the standards in the city ordinance require some discretion given the cost of a seawall and the fact the city just engaged in the septic tank replacement program,” said Community Development Director Steve Olmsted, at a Waterways Advisory Committee meeting Thursday.
The STRP is costing many residents upwards of $20,000 and hitting residents with a required simultaneous seawall replacement could undoubtedly cause some financial hardships.
None the less, Olmsted said he acknowledged the challenge inspectors and officers face as they strive to protect the island and residents’ properties by enforcing seawall standards.
Olmsted requested that the Waterways Advisory Committee consider more definitive guidelines for what constitutes proper seawall maintenance and what constitutes seawall failure.
“I’m left hanging the way the seawall ordinance is written right now. If the wall has moved it’s in violation, then 60 percent of the seawalls on island are no good,” said Bruce Yakola, city seawall inspector.
In addition to looking for more specifics on the amount and degree of movement that should be written in the ordinance to determine failure, Yakola said he is seeing many other tell-tale signs of future seawall failures that also are not addressed in the current ordinance.
Several seawall contractors were present at the Waterways Committee meeting to stay informed on any changes in requirements, as well as voice their concerns about non-licensed contractors working on seawalls.
One of the components of the seawall that most concerns Yakola and Bob Mahar, the city’s chief building official, is the french drain. French drains protect the property from erosion and eventual collapse of the seawall into the adjacent canal.
The french drain is the area between the backyard and the seawall which is filled with gravel held in by filter fabric, Wardle said. He added that the storm water goes through the french drain and goes out through a hole in the seawall, so that land is not washed away with the water.
The seawalls, built more than 30 years ago when Deltona Corp. developed much of the island, are reaching the end of their useful life, both Yakola and Wardle agree.
Also, those original seawalls did not have french drains, said Matt Nolton, engineer and vice president of Forge Engineering based in Naples.
He said they may appear to be french drains, but actually property owners just filled the gap between the seawall and their lawns with gravel after deciding that it would last longer than constantly filling the gap with new soil. There is no filter fabric in these “french drain looking” areas that would protect the gravel and dirt from falling into the canal, requiring continuous soil or gravel replacement, he added.
Yakola said the french drains are an integral and necessary part of the function of a seawall.
Given that integral function several people present at the Waterways Committee questioned whether only qualified contractors should be allowed to work on french drains. Yakola was concerned that landscapers could be hired to throw “boulders and gravel” into the gap never mentioning to the homeowner that the large gap was a sign of a major problem with the seawall.
The Waterways Advisory Committee will be discussing possible changes in the seawall ordinance and will make recommendations to City Council about inspections for maintaining french drains and whether the city should require permits. They will also discuss other possible clarifications in the city’s seawall ordinance in order to minimize failures that may affect a neighboring lot’s seawall as well as the direct property owner’s lot.
Committee members have recommended ways property owners may maximize the life of a seawall including: Conduct a thorough inspection; install a french drain; install pilings around the perimeter of the seawall; use idle speed when boating through canals and avoid using sprinkler systems and davits adjacent to a seawall. Continual use of davits to hoist heavy boats adjacent to the seawall can increase pressure on the wall causing it to eventually fall; maintain french drains by topping them off with rock or gravel and unclog sand and soil from the holes in the seawall where the water is meant to be able to escape.
If the gravel is repeatedly needing to be refilled in french drains and is escaping unevenly, this is a sign of bigger problem, Gilmore said.
Many local contractors, including Collier Seawall and Dock as well as the City of Marco Island, provide free seawall inspections if residents are unsure of the maintenance procedures or status of their seawall.
City officials plan to work with the Waterways Committee, contractors and residents to develop a working plan to properly maintain seawalls. The committee’s recommendations will then be addressed by City Council to determine if changes in the ordinance are needed and if residents should be required to obtain permits to do maintenance on french drains.
“It’s good for the residents. It’s better for the island. We need proper maintenance ... If we have a significant weather event it’s going to be catastrophic,” Gilmore said.
The Waterways Advisory Committee created a Seawall Owner’s Manual that is available on the City of Marco Island’s Web site cityofmarcoisland.com or from City Hall.
Everglades City Seafood Festival 2011
Key West Express' Big Cat
Mayor's office gets a facelift for…









Scripps Interactive Newspapers Group
Comments » 15
sunalsorises writes:
Other communities have created special taxing districts which serve as seawall repair and replacement insurance. Only property owners with seawalls are included in the special taxing district. As an integral part of this program is seawall maintenance through monitoring. Economies of scale can be realized in purchasing gravel and contracting ongoing seawall repair.
We have more miles of seawall than we do of streets. It is completely rational to consider handling this issue as a community rather than individually.
Seawalls were built around the island over a period of time as the island was developed. We can create a replacement program on a schedule spanning a decade or more and base the rate of taxation in the special district according to the replacement schedule or as needed or predicted to be needed. Each property owner will ultimately pay less to replace their seawall than if they did not participate in the special district.
Florida State Statutes have provisions for creating special districts and one method of reaching consensus is by referendum with a majority of those in the district voting to support it.
25yearsonmarco writes:
This is ANOTHER PROFIT AGENDA FOR OUR SPEND SPEND CITY! and the post above was for the pro-sewer candidates. Homeowners should be responsible for their own sea wall- a failed sea wall obviously gets repaired -by homeowners- It is just like a leak in your home- YOU HAVE TO FIX IT- A leak in the sea wall -The ocean in your yard-YOU HAVE TO FIX IT. Our City is unbelieveable. ANOTHER TAX!!! IN A DOWN ECONOMY!! Marco wake up and get these people out of offices and put responsible individuals in office that care about your well being, and not how can we make more money for our City to spend!! This is another "for profit" spend agenda to tax the Marco citizens for more money! The families on this island- know they live on the ocean and have sea walls. They are repaired as needed and homeowners do not need our profitable city dictating the cost and taxing every homeowner on the water!
sailingby writes:
25-that's like saying everyone should be responsible for paying their own health care bills without benefit of sharing in a pool of resources that they pay into overtime. Insurance is a concept for groups to get together and spread out the burden and risks and because of their combined size increases their ability to negotiate group deals. Homeowners purchase insurance to pool resources for the same reason. Private corporate insurance is based on the same concept. I suspect you are against these too based on your worries about someone profiting.
In fact, cities are not-for-profit cooperative agencies. They do not have shareholders and do not pay dividends. They are us. We, through the principle of democracy, make communal decisions with an eye on the greater good of the order. This does not mean everyone will always be happy. In fact, some people will never be happy except when they get to complain. They are typically very self-centered and refuse to see what the greater good could be.
A special district is designed as a method of cooperatively collecting premiums in the most efficient and cost effective method. Believe it or not, accomplishing the business of caring for the infrastructure of a community with local control is the most advanced governing method known.
But you already know that. You complain for sport.
25yearsonmarco writes:
sailingy
maybe you have an endless supply of money to give "our" city so you can sail on by in your retirement. I unfortunately have to work, have a family and do not have all of the money to pay into this never ending mess of city government, that I will tell you again is over the top and is run for profit and spend spend agenda. I complain because we are all being hoodwinked by the likes of you! and we are all paying dearly- we just had a record increase (oops I forget they didn't get the actual amount of tax so they called it a decrease!)on taxes in the a record low economy- the bottom is not here. We pay the highest water rates and bills (our profitable (oops- did I say profitable)of any community in Florida. Our city is not cost effective and efficient and I will complain till we get the "likes" of you out of city government and really truly have the community in mind- instead of what projects the city can come up with to bring more spending dollars into the community to keep forcing more tax and more dollars out of residents who can not afford it. Our city is on a spend spend agenda. People are broke get with the broken economy and help the residents! Sailingby- have fun sailing- we can not afford the fuel (oops-need money for the boat first!)
sailingby writes:
Did you read the article above? The seawalls on Marco Island are beginning to fail. They are old. People are working together to figure out a solution to dealing with this problem by being proactive.
If your aging seawall fails during a storm this year or next how are you going to pay $30,000 to repair it if you are having difficult economic times?
However,if you got together with others who also have seawalls and each contribute (I'm picking a number out of thin air admittedly) $20 per month through your water bill then when your seawall fails the seawall insurance trust fund kicks in and your seawall gets rebuilt saving you from having find $30,000. The City gains nothing from this. They are merely the program administrators.
Fossil writes:
Because of the 30 plus year life-span of our sea walls, creation of such a program would only benefit those who have 1) Never maintained or strengthened their sea walls; or 2) Those who have not replaced their sea wall during the last 20 years. Sounds like the two fellows above who are promoting this plan are about to get hit with a big sea wall expense and want help. I have maintained mine. I have my sea wall scraped, my french drains cleaned and inspected by a licensed contractor annually. I replaced a 10 foot section of cap 14 years ago. I rarely need to add stones. I have reinforced my wall with pilings and replaced my dock and lift two years ago. My sea wall was installed 30 years ago! During that time there have been several serious storms and high tides. If the city imposed this socialist scheme then I would be punished for taking care of my investment while sailinby and sunalsorises get help in replacing their now defunct sea walls. I have a better idea, if their sea walls fall into the canal, the city should fine them for letting it happen in the first place. Whatever happened to personal responsibilty?
sailingby writes:
Would you not carry auto insurance if it were not the law because you drive carefully?
Do you not have health care insurance because you take care of yourself?
If the seawall insurance program were not governmrnt run, but run as a private insurance program would you participate?
Fossil writes:
The majority of us carry auto insurance because it is the LAW. The primary purpose of mandatory auto insurance is to protect against personal liability and medical claims, not to maintain or protect property. Property protection is frequently not elected when the car one is driving has a value that is less then the cost to insure it. Will this program the City proposes protect my property, myself, my family and any guests that may be visiting my home at the time of collapse? Will it protect against my neighbor's wall caving in? Will it protect my or neighbor's boat if damaged from my or their wall collapsing? Will it protect unconditionally? That is to say collateral or liablity insurance? I carry health insurance only because I can afford to and I am too young and earn too much for government aid. If the City continues charging us for things we do not need, I may not be able to afford that any longer! Salingby, maintain and repair your seawall yourself. Don't come to me for money. Be responsible and maintain your own property.
sailingby writes:
Nice attempt to defend your point regardless of the lack of logic.
You carry health insurance only because you can afford to?
Let's go back a few frames, perhaps people who provide protective seawall maintenance like you have should receive a discount on seawall insurance?
You are a very fortunate individual to be so independently self-sufficient. Others have not been as forunate and they are served best by banding togethet. This is why we have social security and health care plans for the elderly and poor.
I wish you good health and a long {seawall) life.
Fossil writes:
Of course I carry my own health insurance. I do not have the benefit of belonging to a corporation. I am self insured and self employed. I do not believe in any social program except Social Security and medicare only because it is now almost time for me to receive benefits I paid for. I have taken care of myself and my family my entire life. I have saved for my retirement and bought my own home. I believed I had accumulated plenty of money to retire in Marco Island, until the last two City Councils started nickle and dimeing me to death. This is just another scheme to reach into my pocket. You lie if you say the city will not recive administrative fees or other such reimbursements from this plan. The city is always trying to invent new services to tax us for. Now you have found a way to get another $20 a month from me. Enough is enough, pay for your own seawall.
Marcosnook03 writes:
help,assistance,wacky programs for concrete walls,higher taxes to pay for these = Liberals. although the heart may be in the right place the brain is not.
self sufficiency,no help from government other than services you pay for (police,fire/rescue,military,representative governemt (we voted them in so we have to deal with this)= realist/conservative
Salingby,
How can you question Fossil's take on the issue? It makes perfect sense to someone who doesn't want to inherit other's problems and proactively took care of his situation so it would not happen to him.
multi_million_heir writes:
a talk with city hall permit dept. a month or so ago on this issue brought forth the following info, unless they have changed something since then, if you need gravel in seawall, was told any amount, you need to apply for a permit (quoted $85.00) someone from the city will then inspect your wall, if it needs work they will require it be repaired not topped off with rock. i was told this was required not something in the planning stage.
OldMarcoMan writes:
Are you serious? Why would you even ASK.
Just go get some Ballast and do it.Hey, if you have a little left over ask your neigbouror if they would like some too.
Geehs I bet the City has a Permit change for Light Bulbs but most people just go to Wal-Mart and take care of it.
You seriously ask if you need a permit? Come on, your joking,, Right?
multi_million_heir writes:
not joking, i heard of people in the business of replacing the rock who were stopped in action. just wanted to find out for myself. no personal interest just curious.
conchsoup writes:
fossil not withstanding- I'm ready to bet that more than 50% of the property owners with seawalls would vote for a seawall insurance program.
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.