Marco’s electric studies grounded

Island's subsidization of other LCEC areas to remain unknown, city takeover of LCEC 'dead horse'

Chairman Rob Popoff and Councilman Jerry Gibson exchange comments following the council decision to not go forward with any LCEC study. Popoff said the problem was the subject got off on the wrong foot with muncipalization being too aggressive. Gibson disputed Popoff's comment and was discouraged by Popoff showing the language in documentation of the original muncipalization study.
Kelly Farrell/ Staff

Photo by KELLY FARRELL, Staff // Buy this photo

Chairman Rob Popoff and Councilman Jerry Gibson exchange comments following the council decision to not go forward with any LCEC study. Popoff said the problem was the subject got off on the wrong foot with muncipalization being too aggressive. Gibson disputed Popoff's comment and was discouraged by Popoff showing the language in documentation of the original muncipalization study. Kelly Farrell/ Staff

Linda McCune, who served on the electric municipalization committee, expresses her hope that if a study of electric rates or takeover is ever considered again, that a similar committee be formed that any interested resident may join.
Kelly Farrell/ Staff

Photo by KELLY FARRELL, Staff // Buy this photo

Linda McCune, who served on the electric municipalization committee, expresses her hope that if a study of electric rates or takeover is ever considered again, that a similar committee be formed that any interested resident may join. Kelly Farrell/ Staff

Chairman Rob Popoff and Councilman Jerry Gibson exchange comments following the council decision to not go forward with any LCEC study. Popoff said the problem was the subject got off on the wrong foot with muncipalization being too aggressive. Gibson disputed Popoff's comment and was discouraged by Popoff showing the language in documentation of the original muncipalization study.
Kelly Farrell/ Staff

Photo by KELLY FARRELL, Staff // Buy this photo

Chairman Rob Popoff and Councilman Jerry Gibson exchange comments following the council decision to not go forward with any LCEC study. Popoff said the problem was the subject got off on the wrong foot with muncipalization being too aggressive. Gibson disputed Popoff's comment and was discouraged by Popoff showing the language in documentation of the original muncipalization study. Kelly Farrell/ Staff

— After more than a year of the Island being jolted by electric issues, the city’s potential studies of LCEC have been grounded by City Council.

First the city created a committee to study the viability of a possible takeover of LCEC. Then consultants were considered to do the job. Finally, another proposal to attempt to determine if Marco is paying more than other LCEC service areas was proposed.

All came to an end, at least for now, at Monday evening’s council session.

“I can’t see why we’re studying something people think they’re getting a good value for. In five to 10 years, they may not think this is a value and then they will call on their City Council,” said Councilman Ted Forcht regarding the particularly unpopular idea of municipalization, or city takeover of Lee County Electric Cooperative.

“Discussion continues to be on municipalization despite my attempt to refocus this. It’s important to focus on the subsidization not the municipalization,” said Councilman Bill Trotter as he introduced the recommendation to change the agenda item from a decision on whether to approve a consultant to study a takeover to one on whether Marco funds other LCEC service areas.

Chairman Rob Popoff said the idea didn’t have enough residents’ support.

“LCEC is providing us the third lowest rate in the state of Florida. With the exception of a handful of people, I can’t find anyone who supports this, and out of those who do, three of them are up here,” Popoff said.

Audience clapping began.

“We’ll have this discussion again,” said Councilman Jerry Gibson, who also chaired the electric municipalization committee and expressed disappointment in the committee’s recommendation to not move forward with a consultant to study the potential of a city takeover of the electric utility.

Regarding Trotter’s estimate that a subsidization study would cost half that of a municipalization study, Jose Granda who served on the electric committee, made a comment in jest.

“If it’s only $10,000, I’ll pay for it myself,” Granda said.

Although most public speakers spoke against any study, Granda’s comment received audience applause as well.

“I’m very disappointed we approved $100,000 for an audit that is nothing but a witch hunt but won’t spend this money for something that will save us money for the future,” Granda said.

Chairwoman Terri DiSciullo of the forensic audit committee expressed disappointment in the comment from Granda, who is chair of the Code Enforcement Board.

“This audit is far from a witch hunt. Our auditors and committee members have acted in a very professional manner and have been nothing but positive in moving forward,” DiSciullo wrote to council about the issue Tuesday morning.

She also clarified that the auditors’ contract is not to exceed $79,000.

Council voted 2-5 with Councilmen Wayne Waldack and Trotter supporting the motion to direct staff to renegotiate consultant William Herrington’s proposed contract for a municipalization study and change it to a new subsidization study.

Gibson appeared to change his stance on the issue, though he says it may not last.

“The people have spoken, Bill, and as my friend Mr. Petricca would say, ‘you’re beating a dead horse,’ ” Gibson said.

The comment was regarding Trotter’s push for the idea and resident Amadeo Petricca, who used the “beating a dead horse” phrase for other city issues.

Gibson said he will not hesitate to say ‘I told you so’ when the issue comes back up as electric rates go up.

“We’ll hear about this again. Jerry made that very clear and I have no doubt we may continue to be challenged when and if rates go up,” said Tricia Dorn, an LCEC account executive, present at the meeting.

Gibson’s vote in opposition of the motion to study subsidization may allow him to bring the topic back for discussion.

Former electric committee member Linda McCune said if the issue does come back she hopes the council will allow for a committee open to all residents, as the last one was, rather than a committee of seven members selected by the City Council.

While Granda disagreed with that idea, Petricca and Bob Brown, also of the committee, said they hoped to see a large committee for a large issue, should it return.

“I wonder what tidbits of information made five council members vote no? Do you think the MICA survey had anything to do with it? How did the council members find out the vast majority of the residents did not want it? I guess my point is give credit where credit is due,” wrote Lynn Bradeen in an e-mail to the Eagle later Monday evening.

Bradeen is a former Marco Island Civic Association president from several years ago who no longer resides on Marco Island.

MICA survey results released in late April indicated that 82.7 percent of more than 2,500 MICA members do not want the city to expend any further funds to investigate electric municipalization.

© 2009 marconews.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Discuss
  • Print

Related Stories

Related Links

Comments » 9

OldMarcoMan writes:

You got Wayne, dont be a Councilman Pig

dougenman writes:

The argument that rates will go up without "city" control is without merit because there is no evidence that the city would have any more control over rates than LCEC. It has always been my opinion that city controlled rates would rise higher than LCEC controled rates and we get the oversight of the Florida Public Utilities Commission.

MarcoFacts writes:

Thank Goodness that once and for all this LCEC nonsense has been put to bed.

playballonK writes:

MarcoFacts, do you really think this has been finally 'put to bed'?
I think John Aceri would cut off his right arm if he could get his hands(hand) on the elec. co.

NobodysFool57 writes:

Apparently two-and-a-half lackeys on council aren't enough, he's going to have to target all three seats that are up for re-election next year.

happy6 writes:

arceri ain't done yet...he will stir this pot again and again...he's a tired ol fart that is looking for something to do that's easy and will pay him for doing nothing.

sailingalong writes:

NobodysFool57 and shadow are both right. Arceri will control the next election with the collaboration of Resort Management.

Arceri will get the four shills he needs and will run the island for his benefit. He will reward Resort Management by protecting their reuse water and their water sewer/rates which are subsidized by the single family homeowners.The single family residents on this island are screwed.

dc5799 writes:

Where is Issler?

MrBreeze writes:

I find it hard to believe that four people that represent the people can not get elected.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features