POLLS: Naples dog park with $120 yearly usage fee gets city panel's support

Would you pay membership fees to take your dog to Central Bark?

See the results »

View previous polls »

Does the Naples area need another dog park?

See the results »

View previous polls »

— A Naples advisory board said this week it supports plans to build an off-leash dog park on city property.

The city’s community services advisory board on Tuesday threw its support behind all aspects of a private group’s plans for an off-leash dog park, including a proposed user fee.

The park – dubbed Central Bark by its creators – is tentatively scheduled to be built on the city’s campus on Riverside Circle. The park will include space for small and large dogs, sidewalks, fences and water fountains.

The two-phase project comes with a projected cost of more than $205,000, and the group behind the park hopes to raise as much in private funding for the park as possible.

While the group plans to fund-raise to help construct the park, the plan includes an annual fee, which would go toward operating and maintenance costs.

The group is proposing a $120-a-year user fee, said Naples attorney Will Dempsey, one of the community members behind the park.

Central Bark would be the only park in Collier County to charge a user fee. Rover Run at Veterans Community Park in North Naples is free, while Canine Cove at Mackle Park on Marco Island accepts donations to maintain the park.

While the board supported Dempsey’s proposal, board member Rosyln Katz said she was slightly concerned about the user fee and registration process.

“There’s something to me that’s wrong about having to register to go to a dog park,” Katz said. “To me it doesn’t go with the dog park. There’s something more welcoming about a dog park than having to be registered, and licensed and signing agreements in advance.”

Dogs would receive tags – much like their county registration tags – in order to use the park. Dempsey said one of the reasons behind requiring registration would be to protect the city from liability.

The registration process would ensure all of the dogs had the necessary shots and paper work required by the group.

The board’s support means the park is one step closer to becoming a reality.

The park proposal will be discussed sometime in April by the city’s planning advisory board, and if approved will go before Naples City Council sometime late this spring.

__ Connect with Naples reporter Jenna Buzzacco-Foerster at www.naplesnews.com/staff/jenna_buzzacco

© 2010 marconews.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Discuss
  • Print

Related Stories

Related Links

Comments » 3

GBR writes:

This, to me, is just like the Marco high school.

I'm all for it as long as it's built with private funds. No tax dollars.


ajm3s writes:

I was encouraged until you got into the fee to support the registration process to address liability issues.

Cited in the article are two existing dog parks that do not require a fee to support the registration process to address liability issues.

Last time I checked the mail, the two cited partks that do not require registration do not have a problem.

Is it simply a fee to support governmental controls now or in the future. Is it lawsuit phobias to challenge litigants and or insurance policies to cover costs associated with potential challenges from litigants?

Too much complexity for a place where domesticated dogs can romp amongst a group of pet owners, who by default have a basic understanding of animal behavior.

JLC writes:

I'm from Indianapolis. We have a lot of private dog parks. I'm very glad to pay the yearly fee. Here, we use an access card to enter the park. Even though a membership may cost a lot, at least you know the dogs are vaccinated. If a dog draws blood from another dog or human, their access card is denied. These parks keep out aggressive breeds and dogs have to be neutered/spayed. The public parks get the dogs who are not immunized (even though they are suppose to be but no one polices the park to keep those dogs out), or the dogs are not neutered/spayed. In the end, it's safer for your dog to be in a private park and may save you dollars in the long run. In fact, I'm on line looking to see if I can find a private park.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.