Marco man moves ahead with lawsuit against EPA

Mario Sanchez continues to battle the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency alleging the agency violated the Freedom of Information Act for not releasing documents related to suspected environmental cr

Mario Sanchez

Submitted

Mario Sanchez

— A local environmental activist took his federal lawsuit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency a step further this week by submitting a motion for default judgment, a move he hopes will finally compel the agency to release the entire record of its investigation into environmental violations that were allegedly committed by the City of Marco Island and its contractors during the Septic Tank Replacement Program (STRP) in 1995 and 1996.

Mario Sanchez, who is a professor of computer science and bioinformatics at Miami-Dade College, runs a blog on the issue, where he has posted what he says are photos and video with GPS and time/date stamps of illegal dumping of waste water during the de-watering portion of the STRP in its early 2005 phase.

“They pumped raw sewage into the waterways and onto peoples’ swales ... there’s no question it was toxic,” says Sanchez.

“The FDEP (Florida Department of Environmental Protection) is complicit, in my opinion. They let the city investigate [the violations] but the city had no authority to tell FDEP to stand down.”

Sanchez is also concerned that the city contractors, Quality Enterprises, which was compelled to remove and dispose of asbestos found on the site of Veteran’s Park, did so improperly. The issue was resolved in a settled lawsuit that had accused the city of violating the federal Clean Air Act.

The EPA, City of Marco Island, FDEP and the Collier County Department of Health all conducted investigations of residents’ concerns and the evidence they provided on those concerns, for both the de-watering process and the asbestos removal. All cases have been closed, and in the case of de-watering, underground water related to the sewer project is now sent to a water treatment plant.

Sanchez, however, wants the EPA to be forthcoming with the information it collected during its investigation. “I went to the EPA under FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) and they gave me nothing to do with the testing they did or a criminal investigation, just some newspaper clippings and emails; it was a slap in the face.”

The EPA’s press office did not have any comment or information to share about the case at deadline.

By filing the motion for default judgment, Sanchez will be able to force to EPA to turn over the entire file, should the judge rule in his favor.

“I’m not a lawyer. I’m just a layman doing the best I can,” he says, “The EPA will throw the case out on a technicality if it can but if not, maybe the judge will rule in my favor.”

The information, he says, is for the Marco Island residents.

“We need to know if criminal investigators were involved. We need to see the report made public so residents can decide for themselves: Was the law violated? Are there any long-term health consequences? Where did the asbestos go?”

© 2010 marconews.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Discuss
  • Print

Related Stories

Related Links

Comments » 10

marco97 writes:

I think the dates are wrong, 1995 and 1996 should be 2005 and 2006 right?

Fossil writes:

Hold em accountable. If the information is not public, make them tell you why. If they aren't there to protect us, why do we have them?

lauralbi1 writes:

I refer you to the article that uses the word "alledgedly". Let's not get worked up over this non-issue.
You know, it's funny, the same people that complain about the funds that are being used to build the bridge and to further the CRA, are the same ones that think what Mr. Sanchez is doing is a good thing. But the Federal funds he has caused the EPA to expend on this issue are just as much a waste, if not more.
It should be obvious to anyone reading this article or informed on this issue, that this has long passed, is a non-issue and is for the gratification of a couple of egos. I include Mr. Foster by default, based on LTE's in Miami as a basis, if not for any other reason.
Even if papers result, it doesn't matter what they show. The statute of limitations has long gone and this train has left the station.
Please stop wasting our Federal money !! CARES has already wasted enough of our City monies satisfying Mr. Foster's ego.
Ed Issler

Brillo writes:

According to Mr. Issler "lies are not lies" if they happened beyond the statute of limitations.
"WE" the citizens of Marco Island want to know the "TRUTH" even if he wants to hide behind another "acceptable" legal maneuver.

dc5799 writes:

Shoveler,
Just keep doing what you do, picking up after THE SEWER RATS.

ajm3s writes:

in response to lauralbi1:

I refer you to the article that uses the word "alledgedly". Let's not get worked up over this non-issue.
You know, it's funny, the same people that complain about the funds that are being used to build the bridge and to further the CRA, are the same ones that think what Mr. Sanchez is doing is a good thing. But the Federal funds he has caused the EPA to expend on this issue are just as much a waste, if not more.
It should be obvious to anyone reading this article or informed on this issue, that this has long passed, is a non-issue and is for the gratification of a couple of egos. I include Mr. Foster by default, based on LTE's in Miami as a basis, if not for any other reason.
Even if papers result, it doesn't matter what they show. The statute of limitations has long gone and this train has left the station.
Please stop wasting our Federal money !! CARES has already wasted enough of our City monies satisfying Mr. Foster's ego.
Ed Issler

Since I believe in transparent government, I have to side with Mr. Sanchez's pursuit.

I do agree with you that I am also against waste in government, but I have to ask in all fairness:

What are the actual costs for the items you listed? I cannot find any listing in the public records or internet. I'm a numbers kind of person and I am not trying to create discord.

Brillo writes:

Numbers don't lie, liars lie!

Fossil writes:

Issler, what are they hiding? I want to know if my grandchild can play in our parks and play grounds on Marco Island without being harmed. I want to know if they can play in the surf. I want to know if they can eat our local fish. They deserve to know that the dust in the air they breath is no more dangerous to them then anyplace else. There is nothing more important to any of us then a safe and healthy enviornment. This is where we live. If our health and safety is not a primary concern of our elected officials and Public Service employees, why are we spending tax dollars on Public Safety or agencies like the EPA? What was done to our community that is so sensitive that we cannot know? For the sake of those who still live here and those who come after us reveal what went on and identify who was responsible. Why? So that we may learn and protect future generations and that we may correct the damage to make our community safe to live in, that our doctors can have a baseline to protect us from possilble future illness. What can possibly be more important? As for punishing those responsible, that is secondary. That said, the longer the irresponsible or deliberate actions are covered up, the longer the crime continues. Once we know the extent of the damage and how much care our leadership gave to protecting us from harm, then we may consider correcting them too.

sailingalong writes:

Thank you Mario. It is too bad that we do not have more citizens like you.

blogsmog writes:

I can only think of one reason why people would not want Mario to find out the truth. A trial may expose that certain individuals had 'access' to certain individuals within the EPA.
Mario, you're a brave man and you have nothing but Marco's families utmost respect.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features