Foreign buyers see big opportunity in housing bust

The Viceroy, a swanky condominium complex in downtown Miami, gives the impression that the United States is in another real estate boom. The sales office is strangely exuberant. Buyers gush about the glam condos — designed by hipster tastemaker Kelly Wearstler — and their hotel-like amenities: poolside libations, daily housekeeping and room service food stirred up by a celebrity chef.

Since January, 262 of the Viceroy's 372 units have sold. But there's a twist: Almost 90 percent of the buyers are foreigners. And they all paid cash.

The Viceroy's story is playing out across Miami. Individual investors from as far as Argentina, Canada, Colombia, France, Israel, Italy, Norway and Venezuela are swarming the city's sales offices to get in on what they see as one of the greatest real estate fire sales in the history of the United States.

At one time, these people would have invested in the U.S. stock market. Now they see the opportunity of a lifetime in the nation's debilitated housing market. The idea is to rent out the properties and then sell them once the economy turns around.

The math is seductive: Prices at the Viceroy are roughly 52 percent off the 2007 peak. Units once sold for as much $670 a square foot. Today the average price is $319.

"I have never seen such a high concentration of foreign nationals acquiring real estate," says Peter Zalewski, who has been in real estate for 15 years and founded Condo Vultures, a consulting and brokerage firm. "Eighty percent of the sales in downtown Miami are foreign-based. This is unprecedented."

Miami is hardly the only hot spot for buyers from outside the United States. Real estate brokers say they've seen a surge in Washington, New York, Las Vegas, Los Angeles and San Francisco. In Seattle, Asians are buying property sight unseen, says Joe Brazen of Brazen Sotheby's International. In New York, 25 percent of buyers at the Armani-designed 20 Pine building, near the World Trade Center site, are from overseas.

"It's a positive in a sea of negatives," says Jonathan Miller, chief executive of Miller Samuel, a real estate consulting firm in New York.

This year in Phoenix, for the first time, there have been more buyers from Canada than from California, according to real estate data outfit Information Market. With the Canadian dollar approaching parity with its U.S. counterpart, the opportunity was simply irresistible to Jim Chuong, a 38-year-old Novartis sales manager from Toronto.

Chuong, whose house in Canada is already paid off, used to invest in U.S. stocks. Now he's investing in Phoenix condos, paying $50 a square foot for units that would cost $500 a square foot in Toronto.

"It's ridiculous is what it is," Chuong says.

For foreigners with cash, the deals can make them money from day one. Chuong buys two-bedroom condos for less than $40,000 in low-crime areas. He only picks up units that already have renters. After paying association fees and taxes, he walks away with $300 a month, pre-tax, on each. The deals are now easy to do, thanks to the cottage industry of companies that has grown up to manage virtually everything for foreign buyers, down to badgering renters for the monthly check.

For the international investor class, the United States' bloated inventory of homes, high unemployment and weak currency make for an unusually attractive buyer's market.

"Never before have all these things come together like this," says Patrick O'Neill, chief executive officer of the Hong Kong-based O'Neill Group, which helps Chinese invest in international real estate. O'Neill says Chinese buying in places like New York is on track to double this year.

"Unless you want to go to Baghdad," O'Neill says, "the United States is the best you can get."

The trend is showing up in the statistics. In a National Association of Realtors report released in July, 28 percent of brokers reported they had worked with at least one international client, up from 23 percent a year earlier. Among those, 18 percent had completed at least one sale, compared with 12 percent in the 2009 report.

"I was going invest in the stock market, but I decided to invest in real estate instead," says Diego Garcia, a Mexico City native on assignment in New York City with Pfizer Inc., where he is a regional finance director. Garcia paid $850,000 for a Manhattan one-bedroom in a gleaming new high-rise that he plans to live in for now. "I'm a conservative guy," Garcia says, "and this was more conservative."

That's not to say there aren't steep risks. An economic jolt could easily throw the whole plan into disarray. The housing market is far from a recovery. In many places, prices continue to fall. What happens if currency values reverse and a foreign owner needs a quick sale? Or a renter bolts in the middle of the night, leaving an empty unit and no cash flow?

It's not as if foreign buying can be counted on for a housing market turnaround. Overseas buyers represent a mere 7 percent or so of today's total. Yet in some cities, such as Miami and Washington, the foreign sales are helping to stabilize the markets.

In past downturns, buying a property in the U.S. was the prestigious purview of the wealthy, but today the market is within reach of the swelling ranks of the global upper-middle class.

Colombians, who often call Miami the most beautiful city in their country, have always been drawn to Florida. The difference now is the upside-down economics. It is cheaper to buy in Miami than in Bogota, and you can fly between the two cities for $59 each way.

"Muchos muchos muchos muchos opportunity," says Elsa de Blaschke, who owns a construction company with her husband in Barranquilla, Colombia, and is hunting for an investment property to buy in Miami. De Blaschke chose not to invest the capital at home because she says Florida offers a better chance of a bigger return.

"The international buyer pool is better than we have ever seen it before," says Phillip White, president of Sotheby's International, based in New York.

To match demand, U.S. brokerages are hiring agents who can speak foreign languages and are pouring more resources into marketing overseas.

In October, agents from 11 Sotheby's International branches will descend on Hong Kong's convention center to regale wealthy buyers there with slick visuals on showcase properties. In Toronto, agents from Florida Home Finders play to crowds of 800 every other Sunday at a Holiday Inn banquet hall. Jenny Huertas, Condo Vultures' international sales director, throws seminars for potential clients across South America.

"Their jaws drop. They can't believe it," Huertas says. "They think these deals are too good to be true."

  • Discuss
  • Print

Related Stories

Comments » 7

MarcoJimbo writes:

Kinda makes you long for the days when only U.S. corporations were foreign-owned. What a testament to the sellout of America brought upon us by the Republicans and the Bush-Cheney administration.

ajm3s writes:

in response to MarcoJimbo:

Kinda makes you long for the days when only U.S. corporations were foreign-owned. What a testament to the sellout of America brought upon us by the Republicans and the Bush-Cheney administration.

This is nothing new, do you recall the Japanese buying frenzy of real estate and golf courses in the 1980's because they had accumulated dollars due to trade imbalance. Although, they bought real estate during the bubble, they reinvested in America. At that time everyone thought that America was going to be controlled by the Japanese. That was in a climate in which the auto mfg. industry was losing market share to foreign auto mfgs. at an alarming rate to the Japanese.

And today, America survives, have hope that we influence foreigners more than they influence us. See, I believe capitalism and free markets are addicting, but I know it goes both ways. But to blame Cheney Bush and Republicans I believe is short sighted.

RayPray writes:

Aren't there multitude of bridges we can also quickly hustle to these gullible foreigners?

1Paradiselost writes:

in response to islandeye1#236971:

(This comment was removed by the site staff.)

Let's not forget the new bridge is being paid for by the stimulus package. Or would you rather pay a toll each time you use it?

Yankee writes:

in response to islandeye1#236971:

(This comment was removed by the site staff.)

The most important thing to do in November is to vote for the right people. Who cares what party they belong to. Members of both parties have been lying to all of us for years. Time for all of them to live up to the promises they make to their contituents.

ajm3s writes:

in response to 1Paradiselost:

Let's not forget the new bridge is being paid for by the stimulus package. Or would you rather pay a toll each time you use it?

Yeah, a new bridge adjacent to an existing bridge, for an island with a population with a mean net worth that is in the upper percentile. I would have thought there are other road projects that would be higher on the priority list in this county and nation i.e. in poorer areas or areas that typically have below standard road conditions or that need upgrading.

Should we complain? Or is this class warfare? God, isn't this the argument for Democrats against Republicans? Wow, I think we just reversed roles, or are the roles the same for both parties?

But hey, I thought the Democrats represent the under privileged and middle class. Could this serve as an example of Democrats acting in the interest of the upper class? This project was originally low on the county's priority list prior to the Stimulus Package. But in a land of "too big to fail", the largest projects with the biggest bang for spending go to the top of the list. Spending on steroids.

This may explain why Goodland cannot get repairs done to RT92A but Marco Island can, even with an arrangement with the county in which Marco Island is compensated to upgrade county roads. Another haves vs have-nots or bigger is better? I will let the residents to decide, for it is above my pay grade.

ajm3s writes:

in response to Yankee:

The most important thing to do in November is to vote for the right people. Who cares what party they belong to. Members of both parties have been lying to all of us for years. Time for all of them to live up to the promises they make to their contituents.

Absolutely, vote for those with your values. To give you an idea of party affiliation losing a grip in America.

Here is a small community in the most liberal Democrat run state of the union (Rhode Island), endorsing a candidate for the US Senate of the opposing party.

Its where I grew up, and is a poor community and I am proud to say, fiscal conservatism eventually has legs when the money runs out.

http://www.breezeobserver.com/Free/MA...

This is an example of true representation of its electorate. They get it. No Obama rhetoric, no influence of "special" interests, just represent the people.

Can Marco Island get it, even from a "yankee" from the north? Apologize, for use of your moniker in my comments.

VOTE 2010

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features