MARCO ISLAND — During a marathon, six hour budget workshop on Monday, Marco Island City Council prioritized capital improvement spending needs, considered ways to cut expenses, and set a maximum millage rate for the upcoming fiscal year.
Councilors voted 5-2 to set the maximum millage rate for fiscal year 2012 at 2.0733 per $1,000 taxable property value. That’s about $.75 higher than last year’s rate. However, the millage could be lowered in September based on a number of factors, including additional spending cuts in next year’s budget and adjustments in the island’s reserve funds.
Council also approved a revenue-neutral (or rollback) rate of 2.062.
Councilmen Bill Trotter and Joe Batte opposed the higher millage rates, which also raised the ire of some residents.
“I think most citizens would find that particular rate too high,” Bill McMullen told council members, to which chairman Jerry Gibson responded that the council agreed.
The proposed 2012 city operating budget is approximately $920,000 more than fiscal year 2011. Some of the increases are due to contractual obligations, but Councilman Bill Trotter believes more budget-tightening can be done, especially since as much as $865,000 of last year’s budget has yet to be spent and city revenues are up. Trotter says rolling over those funds into the city’s unrestricted reserves could not only save money for FY 2012, but reduced proposed fees on Islanders.
“I think we need to institute a rigor (about allocation),” he said, adding that many individual departments are actually proposing increases in certain line items, such as office supplies, travel budgets, and professional organization memberships. If all of those increases were reduced, according to Trotter, the savings could equate to more than $1.16 million. That money, Trotter believes, could then be used to decrease the millage rate from the proposed 2.0733 to 1.9116. The millage rate for fiscal year 2011 was 1.8900.
A final decision on the millage rate won’t be made until September, however, council was required to vote on a maximum millage rate in order for Collier County to be able to send out TRIM (Truth in Millage) notices to homeowners.
Capital improvements
Several Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) are slated for next year including $118,000 to purchase three new police patrol cars; $758,000 to build the Smokehouse Bridge and approximately $1 million for drainage projects. Some of the money will come from approximately $655,000 in funds transferred from the island’s general fund and $609,000 of the asset replacement fund. Rollover funds from fiscal year 2011 will be used to pay for the Smokehouse Bridge project.
Although councilors were in agreement to buy three new police patrol cars next year, additional monies may need to be spent. City Manager Jim Riviere noted an independent report the city contracted which concluded that six police vehicles, or 29 percent of the fleet, should be removed immediately and that 57 percent of patrol cars should be removed between now and fiscal year 2012.
Several paving projects will get deferred for another year, although Public Works Director Tim Pinter urged council to reconsider, noting that it’s been nearly a decade since roadways have been resurfaced with the exception of those ripped up and repaired as part of the city’s STRP. Without regular resurfacing, Pinter said, streets will eventually need to be restructured, not just resurfaced. Several councilors were unmoved.
“Survival over the next few years will be critical,” said councilor Joe Batte. “There are areas where we can roll the dice and I think this is one of them.”
Council did agree to add $100,000 in the CIP budget to several create several bike paths in the next three to four years, noting that the issue is a matter of public safety. The money will be used for planning and engineering, and federal matching grants are available.
“We’ve become a destination because we’re so bike-friendly,” said chairman Jerry Gibson, who noted an increase of cyclists on the island. “It makes it worthwhile (to approve the bike paths).”
Utility fees
Council seemed hopeful that between spending cuts in the current utility budget and an assessment on vacant lot owners, which is estimated to bring in $1.1 million, the need for a 6 percent rate hike could be reduced.
“What we don’t want to do is put a 6 percent rate increase without doing due diligence,” said Trotter.
The city’s Utility Advisory Board will consider items such as reducing thousands of dollars in budgeted overtime for water plant workers and other administrative cuts to reduce its spending.
“I think there are lots of opportunities to save money,” UAB chairman Ken Honecker told council.
Councilors voted 6-1 to re-appoint David Rasmussen to fill a vacated seat on the UAB. Rasmussen served on the board until February, 2011. His selection means the UAB will finally operate with a full, five-member committee and will avoid a lack of quorum at meetings.
The UAB will meet on Aug. 10 to discuss further cost cutting measures. City Council will decide on their recommendations at the next council meeting on Aug. 15, when a decision about the utility rate must be made.







Scripps Interactive Newspapers Group
Comments » 24
happy6 writes:
"many individual departments are actually proposing increases in certain line items, such as office supplies, travel budgets, and professional organization memberships. If all of those increases were reduced, according to Trotter, the savings could equate to more than $1.16 million. That money, Trotter believes, could then be used to decrease...."
ARE YOU KIDDING ME...$1.6M for "additional" office supplies, travel, porfessional fees...?
August8 writes:
MH--is he 6'8''??
lauralbi1 writes:
TO MARCO EAGLE: YOU HAVE THE FIGURES IN YOUR OWN ARTICLE, BUT FAILED ON YOUR MATH. You stated that last years Mileage Rate was 1.89 and this years was 2.0733. That is NOT $.75 higher, as you state in your article. Rather, it is $.1833 per $1,000 of assessed value higher. And, since many homes have been appraised at lower values, some citizens of Marco may, in fact, see a reduction in City and County taxes.
That has been what has caused such a major task to the Planners.
That is not to say that additional reductions should and could be achieved. Rather, please just get the facts correct.
Ed Issler
islandgma writes:
I cannot believe the city is planning on making those that have a VACANT LOT with no improvements pay a ridiculous charge for something they have yet to use. How can anybody approve of this? I think the heat has gotten to those who have thought of this. I have family members who own vacant lots with the hopes to some day come to our beautiful, friendly (?) island and build their dream home. Now they probably think they're in a nightmare! This is totally outrageous and those that are already comfy want others to pay for their current lifestyles... sounds like we're back to the feudal system in the Middle Ages.
NobodysFool57 writes:
Ed, your property value has declined by 50% from 2007-2010.(I checked the Collier Appraiser's website.) It's going to decline again this year, and probably again next year unless the City can get a handle on controlling expenses. Why do you keep supporting the City government? I didn't know a good whiff of crushed asbestos could cause people to exhibit such bizarre behavior.
JohninMarco writes:
If you wonder why Washington doesn't get it, look no farther than our city council. A 30 plus man PD, with no crime to speak of, a fire dept. the size of a small army that is over equipped. And one wonders where the money goes!
OldMarcoMan writes:
(This comment was removed by the site staff.)
Is_It_True_Partially_True_Or_Not_True (Inactive) writes:
(This comment was removed by the site staff.)
islandgma writes:
You guys should stick to the issues - this constant back and forth makes you sound like children. Maybe that's why the council doesn't take it's citizens seriously.
seasonala writes:
If the current council members cannot cut the budget and act on behalf of all citizens we will VOTE THEM OUT.
Is_It_True_Partially_True_Or_Not_True (Inactive) writes:
(This comment was removed by the site staff.)
Is_It_True_Partially_True_Or_Not_True (Inactive) writes:
If this newspaper stuck to the policy it states above regarding defamatory, obscene, abusive polices and made an attempt to weed out violators maybe more than a handful or readers would pay any attention. Do you think they care? I do not!
OldMarcoMan writes:
And the comment they cut wasnt event the worst thing that has been written about this current Council,I was just sharing that I with the Federal Government doing away with Medicare,Social Security , and the City raising Property Taxes It wasn't feeling to good.
On a related topic didn't the Conservatives on Council propose a millage rate of 1.5999 not 1.9116. How come Marco is the last place doing Tax and Spend ?
NobodysFool57 writes:
Have you looked at the 2011 Preliminary Tax Rolls on the Collier Appraiser's website yet? They're posted. DOWN, for the 4th year in a row. Note to Mssrs. Trotter, Waldack, and Magel: Turn out the lights when you leave, the rest of us will probably be long-gone by then.
michelobultra writes:
That 6 million is just for the pleasure of having the city police. Don't forget what Marco's Swinest cost taxpayers in salaries, operating costs, general wastefulness, wrecked cars and lawsuits. Our new chief would be uniquely suited to shutting down the force and handing responsibility back to Collier County.
mahiman writes:
I don't want to get rid of the Marco Police Dept, but it can certainly be cut in half! My northern home has about 9000 low to middle income residents and a force of just 14 Full Time officers. Marco in high season does have double the population...but 34 officers???? Keep it, but cut it down!
ajm3s writes:
Excellent. And it is more than explosion of office supplies. It is an over expansion of city facilities and services with resultant increase of city expenditures. Add to the mix the lack of prioritization.
Even in this article, "Director Tim Pinter urged council to reconsider, noting that it’s been nearly a decade since roadways have been resurfaced". Is it me or is it normal practice to resurface roads every ten years? Is it the potholes from freezing and snowplows?
I guess it may be too much to ask the city to get a handle because on this path the percentage of taxes paid to Marco Island vs Collier County will continue to rise.
God help us all.
islandgma writes:
Remember the days when we thought we could come down here - retire, relax, and enjoy the beautiful surroundings? Now all I hear is lawn blowers, garbage trucks, have to dodge the road workers, put up with the trucks (not pick-ups), and wait until Sundays when hopefully there will be some peace and quiet before the busy season. Marco was a dream once, now it's becoming a nightmare. Thank you city council -
Lafarge writes:
I thought you absolutely loved Recker, Gibson and whoever said that they supported the MIA?
"Security junkies want".........in addition to your list, you forgot to mention something else. They want a High School on Marco so that their children would not have to mingle with those, what did you call them again, that were attending Lely?
Also, please note: God is spelled with a capital G, for most of us.
NobodysFool57 writes:
Public Works wants us to pay for resurfacing the roads because they are being busted-up by the tandem-axle dump trucks being operated by Quality Enterprises, Mitchell & Stark, and others working on City Public Works projects. Why do you think the "old" Jolley Bridge deck is in such bad shape? It's time to quit over-engineering our island paradise. Maybe Tim can get the Lee County D.O.T. director job. He hasn't been caught-up in any asbestos-crushing or Hydrogen-Sulfide release scandals (that we know of yet).
marconed writes:
Cut the police in half and dont let them take police vehicles home, guarantee we will not see an increase in crime
Marconian writes:
Cut the budget around the police and fire depts? oh no why would you do that? when they can scrape the bone of your PW AND Utility depts and still get those 6 new police crusiers! in other words with want a be emergency response DR.Phoney advising council those two depts will hold priority for as long as you allow him to hold the wheel.
Marconian writes:
Dont forget the influx of thousand upon thousands of visitors and vacationers maybe we should shut the whole island down to motorized vehicles all together then we would never need to resurface roads........now to answer aims question actually most cities with as much roadway abuse as ours resurface every couple years to avoid structural or base damage.
marconed writes:
What is in going to take for the council to even consider the idea of cutting the police dept budget?We dont need 35 officers
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.