CONCORD, N.H. — Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney won the New Hampshire primary Tuesday night, adding to a first-place finish in last week's Iowa caucuses and establishing himself as the man to beat for the Republican presidential nomination.
Texas Rep. Ron Paul led former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman for second place, with Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum trailing.
Returns from the first 13 percent of the state's precincts showed Romney with 36 percent of the vote, followed by Paul with 24 percent and Huntsman with 18 percent.
Former House Speaker Gingrich and former Pennsylvania Sen. Santorum had 10 percent and 9 percent respectively.
Romney battled not only his rivals but also high expectations as the ballots were counted, particularly since his pursuers had virtually conceded New Hampshire and were already pointing to the South Carolina primary on Jan. 21 as the place to block his rise.
Seeking to undercut Romney's victory, Gingrich and others sere suggesting that anything below 40 percent or so would indicate weakness by the nomination front-runner.
They didn't mention that Sen. John McCain's winning percentage in the 2008 primary was 37 percent.
Huntsman, in particular, staked his candidacy on a strong showing in New Hampshire. Santorum said second place "would be a dream come true."
Not for Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, who swept into the state nearly a week ago after winning the Iowa caucuses by eight votes over Santorum. That result, coupled with New Hampshire's proximity to Massachusetts, caused Perry to take a pass on the state, and the other contenders also all but conceded a Romney victory on Tuesday.
About one-third of Republican voters interviewed as they left their polling places said the most important factor in choosing a candidate was finding someone who could defeat President Barack Obama in the fall — a claim that Romney made often.
About one-quarter of those interviewed cited strong moral character or experience as the most important factor in selecting someone to support, followed by a candidate's true conservatism.
As was the case last week in the Iowa caucuses, the economy was the issue that mattered most.
In tiny Dixville Notch, the village that traditionally votes at midnight. Romney and Huntsman each received two of the six votes. One went to Gingrich and the other to Paul. Huntsman said hopefully, "Dixville Notch might be a harbinger in this race."
A Romney victory would make him the first Republican to sweep the first two contests in a competitive race since Iowa gained the lead-off spot in presidential campaigns in 1976.
Yet independents are permitted to vote in either party's primary in New Hampshire, and the state has a rich history of humbling favorites, front-runners and even an occasional incumbent.
The state's Republican voters embarrassed President George H.W. Bush in 1992, when he won but was held to 53 percent of the vote against Pat Buchanan, running as an insurgent in difficult economic times. Buchanan, who never held public office, won the primary four years later over Sen. Bob Dole of Kansas, who was the nominee in the fall.
In 2000, national front-runner George W. Bush rolled into the state after a convincing first-place finish in Iowa but wound up a distant second behind Sen. John McCain. Bush later won the GOP nomination and then the presidency.
Twelve Republican National Convention delegates were at stake on Tuesday, out of 1,144 needed to win the nomination.
Obama was unopposed in the Democratic primary.
Bill Gardner, the New Hampshire secretary of state, predicted about 250,000 ballots would be cast in the GOP race. If so, that would be slightly more than double the turnout last week in Iowa's caucuses.
The state has about 232,000 registered Republicans, 223,000 Democrats and 313,000 voters who are undeclared or independent.
In his first presidential run in 2008, Romney finished second in the state to McCain. This time, he campaigned with the Arizona senator's endorsement, as well as backing from Sen. Kelly Ayotte and numerous other members of the state's Republican establishment.
As in Iowa, the economy in New Hampshire is in better shape than in much of the country. Unemployment in November was 5.2 percent, far below the national average of 8.6 percent.
Even so, the economy became the central issue here. Romney committed a pair of unforced errors in the campaign's final 48 hours, and the other contenders sought to capitalize.
On Sunday, after a pair of weekend debates only 12 hours apart, the millionaire former businessman said he understood the fear of being laid off. "There were a couple of times when I was worried I was going to get pink-slipped," he said, although neither he nor his aides offered specifics.
And on Monday, in an appearance before the Nashua Chamber of Commerce, Romney was discussing health insurance coverage when he said, "I like being able to fire people who provide services to me. If someone doesn't give me the good service I need, I'm going to go get somebody else to provide that service to me."
Huntsman, a former Utah governor, saw an opening. "Gov. Romney enjoys firing people. I enjoy creating jobs," he said.
Perry, campaigning in South Carolina, said, "I have no doubt that Mitt Romney was worried about pink slips — whether he'd have enough of them to hand out."
And Gingrich said Bain Capital, the venture capital firm Romney once headed, "apparently looted the companies, left people totally unemployed and walked off with millions of dollars."
Romney has made his business experience a cornerstone of his presidential campaign, saying that Bain on balance created 100,000 jobs, and as a result, he understands how to help boost employment.
He sought to shrug off the attacks, saying he had expected them from Obama in the fall, but Gingrich and others had decided to go first. "Things can always be taken out of context," he said.
Already the campaign was growing more heated in South Carolina.
A committee created to help Gingrich said it would spend $3.4 million to purchase television ads attacking Romney.
A group formed to help Romney — which ran ads in Iowa that knocked Gingrich off-stride — said it would be on the air as well.
___
Associated Press writers Philip Elliott, Shannon McCaffrey, Kasie Hunt, Beth Fouhy and Holly Ramer in New Hampshire, Brian Bakst in South Carolina and Connie Cass in Washington contributed to this report. Espo reported from Washington.
Bird Count in SWFL






Scripps Interactive Newspapers Group
Comments » 10
KlausStoertebeker writes:
World-champion in phraseology! America has no charismatic personalities anymore. Except President Obama. Blocked by congress. To bad.
KlausStoertebeker writes:
Quo vadis republicans?
In the last few days "some desperate Republicans" on the page have put President Obama. "This is a big mistake for our party and our nation," says Romney. "Buh", his supporters on the electoral party in Manchester, New Hampshire call.
The reference is Newt Gingrich, Jon Huntsman and Rick Perry. These three have Romney in the last 48 hours massively attacked because of his past at the investment firm Bain Capital. "Vultures" are firms such as Bain, Perry said. Huntsman noted, even in any case it makes more fun to create jobs as to destroy him. And Gingrich was among perversion of capitalism Romney ex-company. There is a class struggle among Republicans.
A position President Obama has too.
In addition: suddenly pump on anti Romney Republicans, including a casino mogul, Gingrich's campaign. A formally independent donor group called "Winning our Future" with $3.4 million is available for the battle in South Carolina, where is voted on 21 January, to attack leader Romney with TV spots and a specially produced 27-minute film about his past as allegedly with no mercy investment-shark. Strong political tobacco. Unfortunately the truth.
All of this has already damaged Romney. Without a doubt. He was until some days ago in polls still 30 percentage points before his opponent, so the lead is melted down now on half. Verily, the Republican base is not at the feet--is this Romney applying for 2008 already for the second time a presidential candidate
waterday writes:
Marconews: Good old media reporting at it's controlled finest. Ron Paul came in 2nd, yet his name does not have a link to it, anywhere in this article? for archives. Readers can not click on his name, for previous articles with your papers? Of course EVERY candidate (except Paul) does! including Obama. Every Candidate is giving a link, highlighted in blue, except Paul. So is there no stories in your bias controlled reporting, that pertain to Ron Paul?, does he not have any previous articles? Please explain, your slight.
WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot writes:
Romney can't beat Obama. Even if he did, it would be just 4 more years of communism, central planning , and anti capitalism / anti free markets.
Americans deserve what they will get. There is little difference between Obama and Romney.
I can't understand why nearly all American conservatives can't see that Ron Paul is the only true free market capitalist, small government supporter out there? He's not perfect, some things he says are different, maybe a little scary, but the current path we've been on and will continue on if things don't change are much scarier.
Mayor_McCheese writes:
Romney is just another guy wearing the empty suit the I was hoping W wore out.
KlausStoertebeker writes:
"Romney can't beat Obama."
THE BEST ANALYZE YOU EVER DID.
Did you enroll at the new Marco Island state of the art high school?
You made a great improvement.
WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot writes:
Klaus,
Romney cant win because he's no different than Obama. Another empty suit as McCheese says.
KlausStoertebeker writes:
I do not like you but unfortunately you are right.
WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot writes:
LOL!!
waterday writes:
The good citizens of America get fooled by the controlled media, like this article. There is no highlighted link for Ron Paul, they keep him out of sight or spin what he says to his detriment. The general public does not research and listens to the media, and controlled talk show hosts like Hannity and Limbaugh. The results you get, are four more years of the same.. a well paid, puppet in office that does as he is told to benefit the elite and Corporations that keep the rigged game going. I wish more people would take the time to research and demand, real change! the only real person (my definition- can not be bought or influenced and thinks for himself) is Ron Paul. He is not a puppet and is for bringing back our Liberty that has been stripped in many areas. He is 100 percent for our Constitution and for America Citizens.
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.