Editorial: Parties should pay for their own conventions

The two major parties' political conventions are delightful anachronisms. The candidates are generally known well in advance.

The conventions have become four-day commercials and airing of political egos for the two parties. That being true, some in Congress are questioning why the taxpayers should pay for any of this.

They pay through the Presidential Election Campaign Fund by checking a box on their tax returns to voluntarily contribute $3. But in 2008 candidate Barack Obama set a precedent by declining public funding and, given the vast amounts of unregulated campaign cash sloshing around the system, it's doubtful any other candidate will accept public funding.

The public money available for the conventions is about $18.3 million per party. Sens. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., and Mark Udall, D-Colo., have a bill that would ban future taxpayer contributions to the party conventions and ask that they return any money they've already received so it can be applied to the national debt. As of now, the two parties have declined to do so.

They have received influential support from Sens. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., and Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., the chairman and ranking minority member on the Budget Committee.

The $36.6 million goes for lodging, meals, badges, buttons, promotional films, flags, souvenirs and even teleprompters. All this is very nice but hardly essential to the functioning of our democracy.

© 2012 marconews.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Discuss
  • Print

Related Stories

Comments » 0

Be the first to post a comment!

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.