Letter to the Editor: Response to Mr. Honig

In Mr. Honig’s letter of Sept. 11, he writes the following in regards to the 24/7 clinic referendum: “I’m the only candidate on record as having opposed it before the vote – and on the night City Council approved it for the ballot, I urged them not to.” Mr. Honig’s statement is not supported by the official City records. On June 4, 2012 council held a special meeting to discuss the 24/7 clinic referendum.

Mr. Magel gave a presentation on the 24/7 clinic issue. After some council discussion, council opened the floor to public comment. The record shows that five people spoke: Mr. Petricca, Dr. Santiago, Mr. Sacher, Mr. Honecker, and Dr. Biles. None of the speakers supported the referendum. Mr. Magel closed public comment and made a motion to approve the referendum. The motion carried three to two with Mr. Honig’s running mates Mr. Gibson and Dr. Recker voting yes.

At the July 16, 2012 Council meeting, during community forum, I again spoke about the referendum. I had two questions: 1. The language of the referendum was unclear and because of this fact, did it violate Florida’s “single subject rule” statute? 2. Was this tax going to be a MSTU; and if so, was it inside or outside the spending CAP? Mr. Magel responded by saying that the language was written vaguely on purpose and the tax was a MSTU outside of the CAP. He continued to say that this was a rush because the city just found out one week before the June 3 council meeting, that the November ballot was closed.

The record does not support Mr. Magel’s comments as to when the city was informed of the closed November ballot. Jennifer Edwards, Collier County Supervisor of Election informed the city in a Dec. 7, 2011 letter that the November ballot was closed. She went on to say any city referendum questions must go on the August 2012 ballot.

I guess I have a higher standard of transparency than others.

Kenneth Honecker

Marco Island

© 2012 marconews.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Discuss
  • Print

Comments » 6

ajm3s writes:

Folks pay attention, Mr. Honecker is simply reviewing the record, something Mr. Magel loves to gloss over.

That referendum was the brain storm of Mr. Magel, and he confidently thought that it would pass.

That alone should of made those currently on council to ask more probing questions, but no they went along to get along. All the whilst, citizens were asking: what is going on?

Thanks, Ken for keeping the folks informed, because the Chairman is too busy sending out emails and letters misinforming selected organizations.

No_more_cyber_bullying (Inactive) writes:

Why trust Magel? Search his own way of being elected and the ways of his divide and conquer method of behavior.

There is a lot to learn and a lot to be very cautious about and in my opinion, a lot to just not trust.

2themoon writes:

Magel, i just dont trust people with beedy eyes like his...trotter has them too.

No_more_cyber_bullying (Inactive) writes:

Right again Klaus, not beady eyes but "lying" eyes!

No_more_cyber_bullying (Inactive) writes:

A old song about Klaus's Obama infatuation:

"You can't hide your lyin' eyes
And your smile is a thin disguise
I thought by now you'd realize
There ain't no way to hide your lyin' eyes".

JohninMarco writes:

Trust Magel? Why will he not tell of a settlement with a terminated employee, to be revealed after the election. How about back pay and his job reinstated!

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features