Letter: An arms race

Mike Collins, Marco Island

An arms race

One argument made by the National Rifle Association and its supporters is that we citizens need arms to defend ourselves, not from foreign invaders, but from a closer enemy — our own government.

So these self-declared patriots are going to save us from the feds by stocking a proper arsenal of the most lethal small arms available.

But wait. The feds not only have assault rifles, but machine guns as well. I think the National Rifle Association would certainly understand the use of machine guns for citizen self-defense; but machine guns might not be sufficient.

The Army, Marines and Air Force have tanks, missiles and aircraft. Ergo, we need anti-tank weapons, some sort of missile shield and, of course, our own fighter planes.

Where does this madness end? Or more to the point, how did it begin?

Does any rational person truly believe this line of nonsense?

In the meantime, I'm planning to vote only for those politicians who refuse contributions from the NRA, if I can find any.

© 2013 marconews.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Discuss
  • Print

Comments » 0

Be the first to post a comment!

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features